Negative vibe: Will American TV viewers warm up to troubled Olympics in Sochi?

NBC has been covering the Olympics since 1988, but it never has faced a challenge like this one.

It’s hard to remember an Olympics with a more negative vibe: Terrorist threats; Russia’s horrid civil rights policies; an uninspiring locale for a Winter Games; disgust for Vladamir Putin, who spent $51 billion to build up Sochi while so many people in his country can’t put food on the table; and really, really bad hotel rooms, to name a few.

Reporters who couldn’t drink the terrible water over there weren’t the only ones who had bad tastes in their mouths about the prospect of these Games. I do, too, along with many other Americans.

Yet NBC has two things going for it: The brutal weather in most of the country will keep most everyone indoors and in front of their televisions; and it’s the Olympics.

NBC has an investment of nearly $1 billion in these Games. It is hoping that the spirit of the Olympics will trump all the other problems that came with the misguided decision to be in Sochi this year instead of Salzburg, Austria.

During a teleconference, I asked Jim Bell, NBC’s coordinating producer for the Olympics, if he had concerns about Americans warming up to the Games in light of all the negative talk and the security issue.

“I think the short answer is that we don’t know and that’s certainly a fair question,” Bell said. “There has to that balance between the security which everyone expects and wants to be very rigorous, but not to the degree that it stifles people’s enjoyment of the Games.

“We think the plan in place is good, but again, we’ll have to see when we get there once the Games really start off. It has definitely created awareness.”

Still, will it all be forgotten, or more accurately pushed aside, when NBC airs the opening ceremonies tonight? Americans have a remarkable ability to compartmentalize the bad stuff so they can enjoy the good stuff.

After all, these are the Olympics, which always produce great drama and the quest for gold that exists only once every four years.

Dan Patrick explained the essence of the Olympics:

“I think you look at a two-week period every four years depending and you may not follow these sports before or after. But during, you bring it to the nation’s and the world’s attention. So you’ll fall in love with the sport.

“You know, when you look at Eddie “The Eagle” Edwards with ski jumping, you may not have followed ski jumping, or if you see curling in the outfits that they’re going to be wearing. There’s a fascination there that you just can’t script.

“We’ll tell the stories but the stories tell themselves. You sort of gear up for it, and then you’re in it, and then you’re disappointed when it ends. And it happens every time we have the Olympics. You’re like, ‘Wow, it’s over already.’ It will be Opening Ceremony and then it will be Closing Ceremony. It will go by that quickly.

“And you’ll probably have five to seven, either events or people that you’ll take – you’ll extrapolate from the Games and you’ll go, ‘I remember that person or I remember that event.’ And that’s what great about the Olympics. It’s the memories. We all have those memories growing up and we’ll continue to have those. It’s our job to make sure that they are firmly implanted in your minds.”

The torch gets lit tonight.

 

 

 

 

Broadcaster for hire: Former Padres announcer on market just prior to start of season

Yes, it is a tough business.

Andy Masur recently got a tough reminder. A couple of weeks ago, the San Diego Padres informed him that they “were moving in another direction,” and that he wouldn’t be part of their broadcast plans for 2014. He spent seven years with the team.

“The timing of this move is not ideal obviously since spring training is starting next week,” Masur wrote in an email.

Masur, a Chicago native, asked if I could help him get the word out that he is available and ready to work somewhere else.

He writes: “I’m exploring all options, and I’m trying to get the word out to as many people as possible about my situation to cast a very large net over the industry in hopes it will bring my next great opportunity.  I’d love to stay in baseball, but I may have to forgo that this season and try again next.”

On his site, Masur wrote a farewell note to Padres fans. He writes:

I’m sure you’ve heard by now either via social media or somewhere else, that I am no longer with the San Diego Padres organization.  I was not offered a new contract after mine expired at the end of the 2013 season.  I was notified a couple of weeks ago, that there had been a “restructuring” of the broadcasting department and that I would not be a part of things moving forward.  It was very disappointing to hear this news, as I did not want to leave the Padres organization.  Today, I’m thinking back to all the good memories from my time with the team, to dwell on the “other” seems counterproductive. 


It’s been an emotional time for me, what with the passing of dear friend Jerry Coleman and now with the thought of saying so long to so many great people, it’s been rough.  I welcome a challenge, it’s something I’ve always done, something my parents taught me.  I will be fine. Trust me.

Masur is a solid announcer and a class guy. His phone will be ringing.

 

Q/A with Sean McManus on NFL Thursday night package: Expects strong lineup for CBS games; No. 1 priority for network

It is raining at Pebble Beach today, where Sean McManus is on hand for this week’s coverage of the AT&T Pro-Am. However, his mood couldn’t be brighter the day after CBS landed the NFL’s new eight-game package of Thursday night games.

Here’s my Q/A with the CBS Sports chairman on the deal:

What is your understanding about the quality of the eight Thursday games that will be on CBS?

I’ve been working with the NFL for 16 years, and they always figure out a way to give all the networks a number of high quality games. That’s why the ratings are increasing across the board. When the NFL (added Sunday night games on NBC), they understood the importance of getting off to a good start. They understand the importance of having good quality games to launch this schedule on Thursday nights.

Every team will play a Thursday game. Is it safe to assume CBS won’t get a game featuring a struggling team like Jacksonville?

We’ve got a good understanding we’re going to get a slate of games worthy of primetime. Other than that, it is in the hands of Howard Katz (and the NFL scheduling team).

Why was it important for the NFL to have Jim Nantz and Phil Simms call the entire package of Thursday night games?

It was clear when they started to talk to us, it was of primary importance to them to have A talent and an A production team do these games. We weren’t sure what the other networks thought, but if we wanted to be leaders in the clubhouse, we had to commit to Jim and Phil doing these games.

What will be their schedule regarding Sunday games?

Jim and Phil still will do most of the big doubleheader games. But to be honest with you, their primary focus will be Thursday night football. I don’t want to diminish our Sunday package. It’s very important to us. However, to launch Thursday nights successfully, this is our No. 1 priority.

CBS is No. 1 in primetime. Why was it important for the network to land this package?

Getting the Thursday night package is as high a priority for CBS as I can recall in recent memory. It was enormous for my boss, (CBS CBS President & CEO Les Moonves). He was involved in every meeting with the NFL and on most of the calls. If the head of the company says this is the highest priority, it sends a message to the NFL.

The NFL dominates the ratings. Even though we dominate in primetime, the thought of someone else programming the NFL (against CBS on Thursday night) was not an attractive proposition for us.

With the retirement of Dan Dierdorf, what are your thoughts on a new No. 2 team, which will be the defacto No. 1 on the weeks Nantz and Phil are off?

We haven’t crossed that bridge yet. We have some initial thoughts. The good news is that we’re stocked with terrific play-by-play men in (Ian Eagle, Greg Gumbel, Kevin Harlan and Marv Albert). In a practical sense, on most single-header weekends, there’s not a big difference in the distribution of the games. But we will have a pecking order.

This deal only is for one year with an NFL option. Did CBS push for a longer deal?

You always would like a longer contract. This is the first year. While we all assume it is going to be successful, there are no guarantees. This was their condition to sell us the property. A short-term deal is a whole lot better than no deal at all.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not just money: NFL want big-game feel of Nantz-Simms for Thursday night

In the process of working on a golf-related story on Jim Nantz, I talked to CBS Sports Chairman Sean McManus. Last night, I realized there is a McManus quote about Nantz in the piece that gets to a big part of CBS’ new deal with the NFL for the new Thursday night package.

“If you turn on the TV and hear his voice, you know it is a big event if Jim Nantz is doing it.” McManus said.

Indeed, the $250 million or so for the package is nice, but the NFL sought more. It wants a big-game feel to these Thursday night games.

Not to knock Brad Nessler, the previous voice of Thursday night football on NFL Network, and one of the best in the business, but he doesn’t do Super Bowls. Analyst Mike Mayock never was a Super Bowl MVP.

Nantz does Super Bowls. His analyst, Phil Simms, was a Super Bowl MVP.

Together, they call the biggest NFL games for CBS. The NFL believes their presence will elevate the Thursday night games to another level.

It is telling that Nantz and Simms, along with the CBS production crew, will call the entire Thursday night slate, and not just the eight games on CBS. Some of the reason, undoubtedly, has to do with continuity and the difficulty of a new broadcast team starting at mid-season. However, make no mistake, the league wants the the big-game feel of a Nantz-Simms telecast to carry over for the six Thursday night games (plus a Saturday night game) on NFL Network.

The NFL wants to make Thursday night into a showcase, putting it on the same level as Sunday and Monday night games. In order to do that, the league felt it needed an A-team crew. That’s what the NFL is getting in Nantz and Simms.

******

The new Thursday night schedule will mean an incredibly busy fall for Nantz and Simms. However, McManus said they will have several Sundays off, presumably on CBS’ single-header weeks.

So who gets CBS’ No. 1 game on those days? Following the retirement of Dan Dierdorf from the Greg Gumbel No. 2 team, don’t be surprised if Ian Eagle and Dan Fouts get those top games. They have received high critical praise for their strong work.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in NFL

Curt Schilling diagnosed with cancer; status unclear for ESPN Sunday Night Baseball

Sad news:

Curt Schilling statement:

“I’ve always believed life is about embracing the gifts and rising up to meet the challenges. We’ve been presented with another challenge, as I’ve recently been diagnosed with cancer. Shonda and I want to send a sincere thank you and our appreciation to those who have called and sent prayers, and we ask that if you are so inclined, to keep the Schilling family in your prayers.

“My father left me with a saying that I’ve carried my entire life and tried to pass on to our kids: ‘Tough times don’t last, tough people do.’ Over the years in Boston, the kids at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute have shown us what that means. With my incredibly talented medical team I’m ready to try and win another big game. I’ve been so very blessed and I feel grateful for what God has allowed my family to have and experience, and I’ll embrace this fight just like the rest of them, with resolute faith and head on.”

– Thank you,
The Schillings

******

ESPN statement:

“Our thoughts are with Curt and his family during this challenging time. His ESPN teammates wish him continued strength in his cancer fight and we look forward to welcoming him back to our baseball coverage whenever he’s ready.”

 

Podcasts with your truly: Talking Called Shot book, Super Bowl, Deadspin with Awful Announcing, Sports-Casters

Many thanks to Matt Yoder of Awful Announcing and Steve Bennett of Sports-Casters for featuring me on their podcasts this week.

Point of fact, Tommy Craggs, it was Yoder who brought up Deadspin. Here’s the rundown from my AA podcast:

-His glorious feud with Deadspin and how it all started.
-How being called every four letter word by Tommy Craggs has helped his internet profile.
-Fox’s grade for the Super Bowl broadcast and why it’s an incomplete.
-Best & Worst elements of Fox’s Super Bowl pregame coverage.
-Are we getting saturated with too much pregame?
-The firestorm surrounding Erin Andrews and all the unfair criticisms flung her way.
-No noticeable Super Bowl bump for Fox Sports 1.
-Ed’s new book on Babe Ruth’s Called Shot. Is it fact or fiction?
-Why Babe Ruth himself made the most convincing argument that his called shot was a myth.
-A quick look ahead to NBC’s Winter Olympics coverage.

*******

Meanwhile, I was part of a Sports-Casters podcast that also included Grantland’s Jonah Keri and Sports Illustrated’s Luke Winn.

From Bennett:

-Ed Sherman is making his fourth appearance on the podcast. Sherman critiques Fox’s job broadcasting the Super Bowl, explains why the result of the game didn’t have much impact on the ratings, and gives Troy Aikman a little grief for sticking up for Peyton Manning. Sherman also talks about NBC’s coverage of the Olympics, explains what events will be live, tape delayed, or both and notes that Olympic coverage is usually aimed at female viewers. Sherman notes that NBC does have a plan in place if the coverage has to view away from sports and focus on some kind of tragic news event. Lastly, Sherman tells us a bit about his new book, Babe Ruth’s Called Shot: The Myth and Mystery of Baseball’s Greatest Home Run. Sherman’s book will be our book club book of the month for February and he will be back with us later to talk more about it.

*******

Also, here’s the link to my latest sports media video for The Sporting News.

 

Will quality of Thursday night games get significant upgrade on CBS?

So what kind of games will CBS be getting with its new Thursday night package?

One thing is for sure, any Thursday night game featuring Jacksonville will be on NFL Network.

You would have to figure the A games definitely will be on CBS. It wouldn’t be a surprise if the NFL gave the network a significant upgrade over last year’s Thursday games on NFL Network. Probably not to the level of what NBC gets on Sunday night, but close to ESPN’s for Monday night.

After all, if you want to make Thursday night a big night for football, the match-ups need to be there.

The 2013 NFL Network package included possible CBS-caliber games:

San Diego Chargers at Denver Broncos (Week 15)

Kansas City Chiefs at Philadelphia Eagles (Week 3)

Cincinnati Bengals at Miami Dolphins (Week 9)

Seattle Seahawks at Arizona Cardinals (Week 7)

Games with big market appeal:

New York Giants at Chicago Bears (Week 6)

New York Jets at New England Patriots (Week 2)

Two games that looked great at beginning of season, but didn’t pan out:

New Orleans Saints at Atlanta Falcons (Week 12)

Washington Redskins at Minnesota Vikings (Week 10)

So-so games:

San Francisco 49ers at St. Louis Rams (Week 4)

Indianapolis Colts at Tennessee Titans (Week 11)

Carolina Panthers at Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Week 8)

And no way will they be on CBS:

Buffalo Bills at Cleveland Browns (Week 5)

Houston Texans at Jacksonville Jaguars (Week 14)

Posted in NFL

Breaking news: CBS lands 8 Thursday NFL games for 2014; Nantz, Simms on call

And the winner is…CBS.

*******

The National Football League will team with long-time broadcast partner CBS to produce and televise Thursday Night Football for the 2014 season, it was announced today by NFL Commissioner ROGER GOODELL and LESLIE MOONVES, president and CEO of CBS Corp., and SEAN McMANUS, Chairman, CBS Sports.

CBS will air eight early season games that also will be simulcast on NFL Network. NFL Network will also televise eight late-season games in the run-up to the playoffs. The mix of games will include 14 on Thursday nights and two late-season games on Saturday.

The full slate of 16 regular-season games will be produced by CBS with its lead broadcasters and production team, including JIM NANTZ and PHIL SIMMS, on all Thursday night games. In a new twist, NFL Network hosts and analysts will be featured in the pregame, halftime and postgame shows along with CBS Sports announcers.

The agreement is for the 2014 season with an additional year at the NFL’s option.

“NFL Network built Thursday into a night for NFL fans,” said Commissioner Goodell. “Our goal is to bring these games to more fans on broadcast television with unprecedented promotion and visibility for Thursday Night Football on CBS.”

“We are very pleased to build on our outstanding partnership with the NFL by expanding our coverage to Thursday nights,” said Moonves. “CBS is a premium content company and the NFL represents the best premium content there is. I look forward to all this new deal will do for us not only on Thursday nights, but across our entire schedule.”

“The NFL is the most powerful programming in television,” said McManus. “To add a primetime NFL package to our successful Sunday AFC package further strengthens our position in the sports marketplace.  We look forward to having Jim and Phil and our top production team showcased in prime time on Thursday nights.”

Posted in CBS

My new book, Babe Ruth’s Called Shot: Answer to ultimate question isn’t as simple as yes or no

Imagine my surprise Sunday when I saw a nearly two-page spread in the New York Post dedicated to my new book, Babe Ruth’s Called Shot: The Myth and Mystery of Baseball’s Greatest Home Run. What, it was a slow sports news day in New York Sunday?

Many thanks to Larry Getlen for doing the write-up. Much appreciate him taking the time to give a thorough examination to the book. The book currently is available via Amazon and will be in bookstores later this month.

However, I feel I need to clarify a key point in Getlen’s story that I “debunked” Ruth’s grand gesture in  during Game 3 of the 1932 World Series. The perception stems mainly from the headline: “Journalist debunks Babe Ruth’s legendary Called Shot.”

Getlen writes:

In a new investigation, veteran Chicago Tribune journalist Ed Sherman spells out the relevant events of the day, interviews people who were there and pores over other eyewitness accounts to determine whether Ruth’s called shot was one of baseball’s greatest achievements or simply the most loved and lasting of the sport’s outsized myths.

Indeed, my goal for the book is present all sides of the story, not to mention the many twists and turns that helped produce the legend. In Getlen’s piece, he focuses on the items from my research that suggest Ruth didn’t call his shot. They include naysayers among eyewitnesses and even Ruth’s own quotes in which he wavered on whether he had the audacity to point to centerfield during his at bat with Charlie Root.

However, the book also presents evidence from other eyewitnesses who insist it happened. There was a decided split among people who attended the game. Pat Pieper, the Cubs’ legendary PA announcer, had a perfect perch to take in the scene, sitting in the first row behind home plate. He once told the Chicago Tribune’s David Condon:

“Don’t let anyone tell you that Ruth didn’t call that shot. I was in a perfect position to see and hear everything.

“With two strikes, Ruth lifted his bat, pointed toward the center field flag pole, and dug in for Charlie Root’s next pitch. That was the most terrific home run I’ve ever seen. It went out of the park at almost precisely the same spot that Ruth had indicated. As far as I’m concerned, that ball is still traveling. ‘You bet your life Babe Ruth called it.'”

Much of whether The Called Shot is true is left up to interpretation. When people ask me, I always reply it isn’t as simple as a yes-no, black-white answer. There is much gray area in there. Obviously, I have my own views. You’ll have to read the book.

One thing is for sure: Something of considerable magnitude occurred during the fifth inning of Game 3. There is a tendency by people who dismiss the the Called Shot to make it sound as if this was a normal at bat with Ruth merely facing Cubs pitcher Charlie Root.

Far from it. Ruth was being taunted by Cubs players who actually were standing on the field. The crowd was in a frenzy, as the Cubs finally seized momentum to tie the game at 4-4. Ruth responded vehemently with not one but several dramatic gestures, suggesting he was going to do something bad to the Cubs. Then he hit one of the longest homers in Wrigley Field history, which effectively sealed the World Series for the Yankees.

Quite simply, this was the most unique at bat in baseball history. A seminal moment by the greatest player and showman ever to play the game. There’s good reason why we’re still discussing it more than 81 years later.

Coming soon: More on the book, including some excerpts.

 

 

 

 

How to make a bad impression: Many media hotels in Sochi are beyond horrible

Psst…Putin, over here.

Heard the media are complaining about the horrid hotels you’ve built for them in Sochi. Seems like you have an issue with some of them not being finished.

Don’t worry, I have a solution for you. Just give those angry media folks three weeks of double Marriott points. They’d stay in a racoon hole for that.

******

OK, it looks like ol’ Vladamir and Mother Russia are off to a bad start with the media. He invited the world to his country only to house many of them in housing just short of a gulag.

Maybe it was part of the plan, writes Dan Wetzel in Yahoo! Sports.

Right now everyone is laughing at Russia. From the photos going viral around the world to the snickering about an overambitious construction project falling short to the likelihood that posing in double toilet stalls will become the Sochi version of planking or Tebowing.

The only bright side for Putin is no one is talking about gay rights anymore. Or terrorism. Yet.

Of the accomodations, Wetzel writes:

To start, the word hotel means something different here apparently.

On the list of say, hot water, a door capable of closing, a television, light bulbs, clean sheets, a properly hooked up toilet and one pillow per bed, any guest should make like the NBA Finals: take four of seven and gladly move on. And bring light bulbs, they are so valuable on the black market you can trade one for a date with a Russian tennis player.

Caitlin Dewey of the Washington Post compiled a list of tweets from the media about the situation.

Not a good start for CNN.

Stacy St. Clair writes about her hotel nightmare in the Chicago Tribune.

When the water eventually came back on at my hotel — my temporary housing for a night until my scheduled room could be finished — the water that poured through the faucet was dark yellow. It was the color of apple juice or a performance enhancing drug test specimen. The shower left what looked like fish food flakes coating the tub.

I took a picture of the water and tweeted it out.

“On the bright side,” I wrote, “I now know what dangerous face water looks like.”

Better make that triple Marriott points, Putin.