Mariotti to fill in for Jay Mohr on Fox Sports Radio today and Friday

The Jay Mariotti comeback tour moves to Fox Sports Radio.

Mariotti will sit in for Jay Mohr on his noon-3 p.m. ET show today and Friday. In an email, he said he was contacted by Clear Channel about handling the fill-in duties.

“I like the brand and what they’re doing with it,” Mariotti said.

After being mostly on the sidelines since 2010 following a highly publicized legal incident, Mariotti jumped back in this summer with his own site, Mariottishow.com. The site features a daily web-based radio show, videos and Mariotti columns on everything and anything.

Fox Sports Radio gives the polarizing Mariotti, a former panelist on ESPN’s Around the Horn, his biggest platform in recent years. Will it be a one-time test drive, or will it lead more of Mariotti on Fox Sports Radio?

As they say, stay tuned.

 

Super Thursday: With Oregon-Stanford, Baylor-Oklahoma, who needs Washington-Vikings?

As Thursday nights go, this is a most excellent pre-Thanksgiving feast. Maybe the best ever for college football.

ESPN has No. 3 Oregon traveling to No. 5 Stanford tonight. Meanwhile, Fox Sports 1 will show No. 6 Baylor hosting No. 10 Oklahoma.

Two games with four top 10 teams and plenty of BCS implications on a Thursday night. I mean, who needs Washington at Minnesota on NFL Network? That’s Mediocre vs. Terrible.

How did this bounty happen? According to ESPN, Stanford was slated to host a Thursday night game this year, and the network requested the one against Oregon. Voila, ESPN now gets one of the best match-ups of the year on any day.

Fox Sports 1 also has a strong game. The staggered starting times will allow college football fans to watch the end of both games: Baylor-Oklahoma starts at 7:30 ET and Oregon-Stanford is at 9 p.m. ET.

How unusual are these Thursday night powerhouse games? Bill Connelly of SB Nation writes that since 2009, there only have been two match-ups on Thursday nights featuring ranked teams: Sept. 15, 2011: No. 3 LSU 19, No. 25 Mississippi State 6; Nov. 10, 2011: No. 10 Virginia Tech 37, No. 21 Georgia Tech 26.

Connelly:

We rarely expect to see elite teams playing on Thursday nights. These games are usually reserved for programs that are happy to risk iffy weeknight attendance for a spot on national television. We’ve seen a lot of Georgia Tech on Thursday nights over the years, for instance. But the big teams and huge games are typically saved for Saturdays.

Alabama-LSU is slated for Saturday night on CBS. That should be more than enough to fill your plate. ABC is showing Notre Dame at Pittsburgh in primetime. When in doubt, always go with the Irish, right ABC?

However, for quality and quantity, it will be hard to top Thursday night. Both ESPN and Fox Sports 1 should do strong ratings. Whether they beat the NFL monster remains to be seen, but the pros will lose many viewers to the college games.

Enjoy the feast, college football fans.

 

Cubs news: Moreland departs as analyst: Why team exercised contract option with WGN-Ch. 9

Keith Moreland isn’t returning to the Cubs radio booth. In a note to WGN-AM 720, he said, “After spending three years doing it, I’ve simply decided that I want to spend more time at home in Texas.”

Hard to blame him, considering the Cubs averaged 96 defeats per year during his three seasons in the booth.

However, even though the Cubs are in the dumps, there will be plenty of suitors to be their next radio analyst. It’ll be interesting to see if they go with a former Cub as they did with Moreland or with someone who doesn’t have ties to the team.

Prior to the Cubs deciding on Moreland to replace Ron Santo, who died after the 2010 season, the speculation list included Doug Glanville, Eric Karros, Todd Hollinsworth, Gary Matthews and Mitch Williams. All had a Cubs connection.

Former Cub favorite Mark Grace also was on the list back then. However, his personal issues now make him an unlikely candidate.

If I were to bet, I think the Cubs will make a run at Glanville. The former Cub does a good job at ESPN.

******

Earlier today, the Chicago Tribune’s Robert Channick reported the Cubs exercised their option to end their deal with WGN-Ch. 9 after 2014.

Channick wrote:

The Chicago Cubs have exercised an option to get out of their broadcast contract with WGN-TV after the 2014 season, sources close to the situation said Wednesday.

On Tuesday, the team notified the Tribune Co.-owned station it had 30 days to meet a higher assessed fair market value for the broadcast rights, or they would be opened up for negotiation with other media. A third-party consultant hired by the Cubs and WGN-TV determined  the increased valuation, according to sources.

After 30 days, the team would be free to explore other broadcast options for about 70 games televised each season by WGN, opening the door to a potentially more lucrative contract or perhaps its own cable sports network.

The move wasn’t surprise and doesn’t mean the Cubs are ending their association with WGN. Channick writes:

The Cubs get about $20 million to air 70 games each year on WGN. If the team didn’t give notice to opt out at this point in the contract, the deal would run through 2022 at the current rate, and the Cubs would lose any leverage for renegotiating the broadcast rights, according to sources.

In July, I wrote that the Cubs are looking to cash in on the big money that is being spent elsewhere for local TV rights. However, unlike the Los Angeles Dodgers, who will receive a big haul, the Cubs options could be limited.

 

Posted in MLB

He’s back: Bob Knight returns as ESPN analyst for SEC games

There had been speculation that Bob Knight was done at ESPN after last season.

Well, it turns out the former coach is back. Knight is slated to work Thursday night SEC games with Rece Davis.

Whether by his choice or the network’s, Knight’s role has been greatly reduced since he arrived at ESPN in 2008. He once had a major presence as a studio analyst and on multiple games. Now he is doing one SEC game per week.

Perhaps at age 73, Knight wants to keep his hand in the game while limiting the travel and other broadcast duties. Understandable.

Then again, maybe the demand for the old coach isn’t what it used to be.

 

 

Author Q/A with Rich Cohen on ’85 Bears: Believes ‘big book’ on fabled team hadn’t been written

Mike Ditka had the same question for Rich Cohen that I had: Why write another book on the ’85 Bears?

When Cohen met with Ditka, the coach, as only he can, gruffly said, “Do you know how many people have written about this team?”

Cohen was up to the challenge. “I told him, ‘Why did you run the same offense all those years? Because you believed you could win with it and do it better than anyone else.”

“Good answer,” Ditka said.

I covered the ’85 Bears as a young, somewhat naive reporter for the Chicago Tribune. I always say if I could go back to one year in my life, it probably would be 1985. It was a 24/7 thrill ride from the first day of training camp through the Super Bowl.

Yet even I had some ’85 Bears overdose in recent years. When I heard there was another book coming out on the team, I can’t say I was overly excited.

Well, Cohen’s Monsters: The 1985 Chicago Bears and The Wild Heart of Football isn’t just another book on the fabled team. It is a skillfully written portrait of not only that group of highly compelling and wacky players and coaches, but also of the Bears as a franchise and the impact that team had and still has on Chicago. Cohen devotes many pages on George Halas, who laid the foundation for ’85 by hiring Ditka as his last act.

Cohen, who grew up in the Chicago suburbs, weaves in his perspective as a 17-year old fan who somehow managed to snag a ticket to the big game in New Orleans. Then more than 25 years later, he connects with the players he worshiped, including a memorable encounter with his hero, Jim McMahon.

I recently met with Cohen. Not sure it was my best interview, as I tended to dominate the conversation with my stories about that year. Guess being around the ’85 Bears will do that to you. Thankfully, Cohen didn’t seem to mind.

Here’s my Q/A:

How did this book come about?

It happened in a roundabout way. I owed Harper’s a story about my father. I realized I can’t write about my father. The editor said, ‘Why don’t you write about the Knicks?’ I hate the Knicks. She said, ‘Has there ever been a team you really loved?’ I said, ‘The ’85 Bears.’

I talked to Doug Plank, who wasn’t even on that team but was the spirit for 46 defense. He had been coaching with the Jets. We talked for four hours. He was so smart and funny. I thought maybe enough time had gone by, where they might be reflective and tell you what really went on.

Were you concerned that the ’85 Bears already had been covered extensively in books and documentaries?

I spent a lot of my life trying to find stories nobody had written about. I realized it was a mistake. You should write about stories you care about. There’s a reason why these stories keep getting written.

I’m a different kind of writer. I would give it a different kind of treatment. If you do it well, it wouldn’t matter how many books had been written, because this would be unlike any other book.

What was your approach?

I just don’t think the big book of the ’85 Bears had been written. It almost took someone a little younger from a different generation who was a little bit removed. I didn’t have experiences with McMahon or Ditka. I came in clean.

It’s a coming of age story about me, but it’s really not about me. It’s about the role a great team plays in your life as you get older. These guys get older too.

I love writing sports. I love all the Shakespearean stuff. The patriarch angle in this story. Halas and Ditka. Halas and his grandsons. Ditka and McMahon. I mean that stuff is out of The Godfather.

My father’s favorite book was The Boys of Summer. I thought maybe I could do the same kind of book where you try to capture the team and the era.

What stood out for you?

It’s an intellectual history of the game, and the Bears were at the center of it. You see this big arc of the 46 defense. Halas was Bill Walsh. He created the modern NFL offense. With the T-Formation, Halas made the quarterback the coach on the field. Then Buddy Ryan, a defensive coach, realizes the importance of the quarterback. He believes, rather than cover 10 guys, let’s just kill one. Plank said, ‘Our game plan was, we’re going to get to know your second-string quarterback today.’

It’s ideological look at Bears history. I didn’t know anything about that as a kid.

What was it like meeting McMahon? Was meeting him your reason for writing the book?

He was my favorite athlete. It was unreal to meet him.

Brian McCaskey helped me get an interview. McMahon emailed me and said, ‘Sure, c’mon out (to Arizona).’ He wrote me a lot of funny emails.

I spent a bunch of time with him. I heard what kind of a mess he was. When I saw him, he was all there. He recalled things from specific games. We sat in his office. He chewed tobacco, spit in a cup and answered questions. It was great.

What was it like meeting Ditka?

The day before I met him, I had lunch with (former Bears linebacker Jim Morrissey). He said, ‘Ditka is going to give you a hard time.’

I said, ‘Yeah, he’s tough guy, but with a heart of gold.’

Morrissey said, ‘No heart of gold.’

He’s intimidating, intentionally intimidating.

I talked to him a lot about the ’63 team. He wanted to talk about ’63. He said, ‘Why does everyone always want to talk about the ’85 Bears?’

What about the rest of the Bears?

Plank was a great guy. I kept going back to him to check stuff. He drew me the 46 defense. I’ve got the 46 defense drawn by 46.

Brian Baschnagel was great. Emery Moorehead was terrific. Otis Wilson was very forthcoming. Kurt Becker. There were a lot of great guys to talk to.

I also talked to guys on other teams: Danny White, Joe Theismann, Cris Collinsworth. They all said the ’85 defense was the best they’ve ever seen.

Was there anybody you wanted who you didn’t get?

I couldn’t get Dan Hampton. Jeff Pearlman’s (biography on Walter Payton) made it hard for me. Hampton was upset with the way it came out.

Steve McMichael also was upset about the (Payton) book. He wouldn’t sit down with me, but I talked to him a lot.

What is the legacy of that team?

Think about the league now and there’s no defense anymore. You used to want the defense to come on first. The defense scored. The defense did crazy things. Every play, you didn’t know what was going to happen.

That excitement when you saw Joe Theismann look up and it seemed like the Bears had 40 guys in his face.

They transcended the sport. I tried to capture that in the book, but even still I don’t understand it exactly…There are great teams, but they don’t exactly go with the city. That team somehow expressed something about Chicago. The way people think about themselves in Chicago.The music, the people, and the comedy. It doesn’t happen very often.

Also, it always seemed like they were having so much fun.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Awesome Sports Illustrated cover: Pays tribute to Boston first responders in Red Sox victory

Really a nice touch by Sports Illustrated. In fact, it is inspired and inspiring. This is the kind of cover that has an impact.

From SI:

*******

In this week’s SPORTS ILLUSTRATED (11/11/13)—on newsstands Wednesday— senior writer Tom Verducci writes about how 2013 World Series MVP David Ortiz, one of the greatest postseason sluggers ever, used leadership and resilience to carry the Red Sox and the city of Boston to their third Series title since 2004. Ortiz, who had a .688 BA with 11 hits and two home runs in the six- game Series against the Cardinals, shares this week’s cover with Boston police officers Javier Pagan and Rachel McGuire and detective Kevin McGill –all three appeared on SI’s April 22, 2013 cover as the issue reported on the Marathon bombings.

Writes Verducci, “If any one person were to lead the Red Sox and—given the team’s cultural importance in New England—by extension Bostonians through a terrible time, it was a man with an outsized capacity for resilience. The grind of a 162-game season played in a 182-day window, followed by the wilds of postseason play, would test even Lewis and Clark. But among baseball’s 109 world champions there has never been a story of resilience quite like this one. No team—not the 1969 Mets, not the ’91 Twins—has won the World Series in the year after being as bad as the Red Sox were in 2012 (.426 winning percentage). And only six months before the Series—just a half mile east on the same street where Ortiz was applauded—two pressure-cooker bombs exploded near the finish line of the Boston Marathon, killing three people, wounding 264 others and terrorizing hundreds of thousands. Four days later the citizenry was ordered to “shelter in place” during a daylong citywide lockdown, while a manhunt for the bombers proceeded. The pleasant routines of life, including baseball, were put on hold.”

Reactions to Incognito: Gannon recalls culture in Oakland locker room ‘made me sick’

Somehow, I suspect that when next year’s Hard Knocks goes to air, there won’t be a funny, ha-ha clip of an innocent rookie being taped to his locker.

And what of the annual rookie ritual of getting up in front of the entire team to sing the old college fight song? Perhaps that stays in, but you can be sure there also will be footage of the head coach telling the players that he expects a certain code of conduct in the locker room. In other words, no Richie Incognitos.

There was plenty of reaction to the story yesterday. As you would expect, Keith Olbermann came down hard on Incognito.

The discussion on NFL Monday QB on CBS Sports Network was extremely telling. It confirms my suspicions that there have been many Richie Incognitos through the years.

Read what Rich Gannon had to say:

I have absolutely no tolerance for this type of behavior. I’ve seen firsthand how this can divide and really destroy a locker room, a team and quite frankly, an entire organization… Early in my career at Minnesota, I remember the older players, there was a culture that existed where they were worried about their jobs. They didn’t reach out and help younger players. I also went to places like Kansas City where Marty Schottenheimer created a culture and environment where none of this existed. Older players reached out to younger players and welcomed them to the organization and were very supportive.

Then I went to an organization in Oakland, which quite frankly made me sick. This culture and environment existed out there with older players bullying younger players. At one point, I remember coming into the locker room my very first year there, and I saw a group of defensive lineman had our young tight end tied up with tape. They were punching him. They were putting icy-hot and baby powder with water on this guy. They were trying to demoralize the player.

I freaked out. I said, ‘I need this guy on Sunday.’ I really thought that I helped to change the culture and the environment in that building… If this exists in your locker room, you have no chance of being successful. Unfortunately, it still exists in certain locker rooms.

Phil Simms: You have to have a pulse on your football team. (When I played for the Giants), I’m not going to say our atmosphere was the best in the NFL. But our head coach Bill Parcells, he had guys in the locker room – that was kind of their job. To watch and see what was going on and if there was a problem, to let him know. They weren’t snitches. We know who those guys were on the football team. In fact, we looked up to them because we knew their job was really important for the whole culture of the team. So when you hear what went on with the Dolphins, I just can’t believe other players and coaches and people didn’t do something about it. You have to put the blame, no matter what comes out of this, on everybody. It’s a rough situation.

********

Meanwhile, ESPN’s Tom Jackson didn’t mince words about Incognito.

I think Richie Incognito is a racist. I think he bigoted. I think he’s a bully. I think it’s wrapped all into one package. I don’t want people to be under the perception that conduct in an NFL locker room, that somehow we are not aware of what is . . . OK and not OK. I’ve heard a lot of that today, well the locker room is a place where people are very different. They’re not this different.

 

 

 

Posted in NFL

Heated debate: Does Angell deserve baseball writer’s top honor at Cooperstown over Bisher, Durslag?

My latest column for the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana is on an interesting debate occurring in the sports writing fraternity.

From the column:

********

The National Baseball Hall of Fame has been awarding the J.G. Taylor Spink Award annually since 1962, recognizing career excellence as a baseball writer. Spink, the long-time publisher of the Sporting News, was the first winner, followed by giants like Grantland Rice, Ring Lardner, Damon Runyan, Red Smith, Jim Murray, to name a few.

The honor doesn’t mean there’s a bust of the writer wearing a team cap at Cooperstown. However, there is a nifty plaque with the roll call of winners. All in all, it’s pretty nice to have your name on that plaque.

Usually, voting for the award flies way below the radar. But not this year in the sports fraternity.

The finalists for the Spink are: Roger Angell, Furman Bisher, and Melvin Durslag.

At issue is whether either of the two long-time newspaper columnists (Bisher in Atlanta and Durslag in Los Angeles) who wrote on tight daily deadlines should get the nod over Angell, whose brilliant, if not iconic, prose appears only occasionally in the New Yorker and book collections of his essays.

Interestingly, the debate is taking place on Twitter and Facebook, light years away from when the three candidates began their careers lugging typewriters up to the press box decades ago.

As much as anybody, Dave Kindred is responsible for launching the conversation. In a Facebook post, he said that he voted for Angell over the late Bisher, his long-time friend.

Kindred wrote:

I’d be thrilled if Furman won. I’d go to Cooperstown for the ceremony. Hell, I’d make the speech for him if asked. Both Angell and Furman are Hall of Fame-worthy, but one’s a magazine/book guy, one’s a newspaper columnist — so their work is judged by different standards.

It just seems to me that Angell should have won this thing 25 years ago; few journalists ever wrote baseball with greater understanding for a wider audience.

Naturally, sportswriters being sportswriters, weighed in with their diverse opinions in the comments section of Kindred’s post.

Here’s some samples:

Mark Purdy: That’s one magnificent trio of nominees. But I have to go with Furman on my ballot. I suppose it’s partially because as a daily newspaper hack, I’m inclined to side with those facing multiple weekly deadlines rather than one every two or three months. And it’s not as if Angell, a wonderful writer, has been ignored in the awards department. He’s been honored by organizations that would never salute the likes of Bisher or Durslag. Angell was elected a Fellow to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, for crissake (other fellows include Thomas Jefferson, Jonas Salk and Duke Ellington). Props to him. Spink to Bisher.

Philip Hersh: I went with Roger. At his best, pure genius on a page. But Mark’s argument is solid.

Claire Smith: I honestly do not think I would have recognized the magical connection between beautifully crafted prose and the sport that was made for writers if it were not for Roger Angell. Good choice, Dave. Will follow your lead.

Orange County Register column Mark Whicker engaged in a spirited Twitter debate with Kindred. Whicker is pro-Bisher. One of his tweets said: “My view is the Spink is not a Pulitzer. It should go to those who regularly wrote about the game, on mundane and profound days alike.”

Indeed, a big issue is the exact criteria. Is the Spink supposed to be limited to beat reporters or columnists? Or can it include someone like Angell?

On his blog, Joe Posnanski notes there are no instructions on the ballot.

Posnanski writes:

Everyone is just supposed to know what it is all about. But I’m not 100% sure so I looked it up. The award is given for “meritorious contributions to baseball writing.” What does that mean? As you know, we in the BBWAA love to parse words so that “most valuable” doesn’t necessarily mean “best” so let’s take a look at the words here.

Meritorious means “deserving reward or praise.” That’s pretty simple.

But “contributions to baseball writing” is trickier. What the heck does that mean?

Actually, the “contributions to baseball writing” makes the task quite simple here, in my view. It has to be Angell. As Kindred says, it is stunning that his name wasn’t engraved on that plaque a long time ago.

Sure, Angell doesn’t write on deadline and has months to polish his essays “into glistening jewels,” as Posnanski writes. That shouldn’t matter. To suggest that you could come close to writing like Angell with the extra time is like saying with a lot of practice, you could get a hit off of Sandy Koufax.

Indeed, perhaps there’s your comparison. Angell is the baseball writing equivalent of Koufax, a one-of-a-kind artist on the game. Fortunately, unlike Koufax, Angell’s career has spanned generations. At age 93, he still is writing about baseball as only he could for the New Yorker.

Here’s a passage from Angell on one of Mariano Rivera’s final games at Yankee Stadium:

Mariano came on with one out in the eighth, and surrendered a single but no runs, and along the way gave us still again his eloquent entering run from deep center field; the leaning stare-in with upcocked mitt over his heart; the reposeful pre-pitch pause, with his hands at waist level; and then the burning, bending, famed-in-song-and-story cutter. All these, seen once again, have been as familiar to us as our dad’s light cough from the next room, or the dimples on the back of our once-three-year-old daughter’s hands, but, like those, must now only be recalled.

Angell’s writing blows me away now the same way it did more than 35 years ago when I discovered his work as a young kid who aspired to be a sportswriter. I still have memories of being held captive by his first book, “The Summer Game.” Angell’s writing on baseball truly inspired me, and as Claire Smith says, I’m sure many others too.

This isn’t a vote against Bisher, one of my all-time favorites on a professional and personal level, or Durslag, who had a distinguished career. And memo to the Hall: Time to get Dave Anderson of the New York Times on the ballot sooner than later. He’s certainly worthy.

Rather, more than anything else, it really is time to give Angell overdue recognition at the game’s most revered address. When you talk about someone who contributed to baseball literature, how many people rank higher than him?

Angell deserves to have his name on that Spink plaque, along with Rice, Smith, Runyan, Lardner, Murray and the others.

 

 

Dino Costa: I will make my next employer look brilliant for placing faith in me

Richard Deitsch of SI.com received an email from Dino Costa. I received one from Costa that was a bit more colorful. Let’s just leave it that.

Costa has been upset with me for not letting him tell his side of why he was dismissed from Sirius/XM.

So in the interest of being fair, here is what he wrote Deitsch:

“I enjoyed my time with SXM for the five years I was with them,” Costa said, in an email. “We had philosophical differences in regard to the my placement in terms of being a featured personality, as I believed I had earned by my work the opportunity for advancement with the appropriate promotional vehicles enjoyed by others on the air at the company. After five years of needle-moving radio, accruing consistent critical acclaim, I chafed at the idea of them placing my show on an irrelevant channel [SiriusXM Sports Zone] during a time that basically wiped out half the audience I had built the previous five years, and then not going about the transfer in a way that would allow my listener base to know where I was…The show was a core asset that I felt was never fully polished by SXM brass, which would have allowed the show to become an even larger asset for SXM.”

Costa said he is anxiously awaiting the opportunity to get back on the air. “I will make my next employer look brilliant for placing the faith in me, and then allowing me to go out and to justify that faith,” he said. “I’d like to be involved with a set of creative and innovative people moving forward — individuals who like to think outside the box — people who recognize the need for sports radio that isn’t the same old same old.”

OK, who wants to look brilliant? More to come, I’m sure.