Sunday read: The great Pat Jordan writes about returning to spring training

Any time Pat Jordan writes, you must read.

This time, he writes about his memories of spring training as a young prospect for SB Nation Longform. Jordan was a bonus baby pitcher for the Milwaukee Braves. However, it never worked out for him, leading to his classic book, A False Spring, and a sensational career as a sportswriter.

Baseball’s loss, journalism’s gain.

Now 72, Jordan writes of spring training:

Its hope was always false, but still, for 54 years, the first three as a pitcher in the Milwaukee Braves’ organization, and the last 51 as a sportswriter, I still returned to spring training each year, more out of habit than expectation, for as I grew older I no longer believed in miracles. Spring training for me became just a pleasant two weeks in the sun, or maybe not so pleasant as I chased some obnoxious multi-millionaire baseball player across practice fields, waving my notebook, shouting, “JUST ONE MORE QUESTION!” until I caught him, or at my age, didn’t.

This is well worth your time.

 

 

Posted in MLB

Ladies Days: Patrick, Rousey will be the focus for Fox this weekend

I don’t know much about auto racing, but I know of Danica Patrick. I know even less about UFC, but I know of Ronda Rousey.

Fox Sports is counting on both women to help deliver big ratings this weekend. Saturday night, Rousey will make her UFC debut. Sunday, Patrick, sitting in the pole position, will be the feature attraction for the Daytona 500.

Writes Tom Hoffarth of the Los Angeles Daily News:

Eric Shanks, the Fox Sports co-president and executive producer, gets the best of both worlds. He’s in Florida with his network’s coverage of what’s become an unprecedented moment in NASCAR history. But he’ll also be monitoring the events of the UFC landmark moment from his laptop (computer, that is), knowing Fox could darn well have Rousey show up someday soon on one of its mixed-martial arts cards.

“Two of the greatest female athletes in a male-dominated event on center stage – the only thing better would be to have Ronda fighting on Fox Saturday before Danica on Sunday,” Shanks said Thursday afternoon.

Rousey figures to attract an audience Saturday night. Patrick is a bit more of a wildcard because she still has to perform in the race. If she says in contention throughout, big number for Fox.

Said Shanks:

“I’m not sure on Monday morning whether we’ll be able to pinpoint any one particular thing that that will attract viewers to this – Danica’s part of it, but there’s also some other NASCAR rookies to bring new blood, the new car designs … there’s a ton of things converging here.

“At the end of the day, you just hope that it’s kind of an eye-opener – here’s two women at the top of their perspective sports, in sports considered hands down very male-dominated. It’s a cliché, but the idea that sports can brings stories to life that no one could ever write keeps bearing itself out time and time again. It’s fantastic.”

Was moving to NBC right move for Posnanski? Writes debut column on A-Rod

You have to assume Joe Posnanski is making a ton of money.

Why else would he have left Sports Illustrated, where he was arguably the magazine’s highest profile writer, for the new Sports on Earth, where he was that site’s highest profile writer, only to depart a few months later for NBCSports.com, where he will be that site’s highest profile writer?

Follow the money, right?

NBC made it official today, announcing that Posnanski will be its national columnist for NBCSports.com. In addition, he will also contribute to GolfChannel.com, NBCOlympics.com, NBCSports.com’s SportTalk blogs, including HardballTalk, as well as to the websites of the NBC Sports Regional Networks.

NBC has branded his weekly Friday column as “The Big Read.” His debut entry is on Alex Rodriguez.

Clearly, NBC hopes Posnanski’s name recognition, not to mention talent, will helps its site gain more of a foothold in the crowded digital sports arena. I’ve heard some people complain that his luster has been diminished by the backlash from his book, Paterno, which met with some harsh reviews, including one from this corner. There might be some truth to that, but I think time has a way of smoothing over the edges.

If you’re Posnanski, the bigger question is: Will people still read my stuff? He had a huge platform at Sports Illustrated. Not so much at Sports on Earth, and NBCSports.com faces stiff competition from the other network entries from ESPN, CBS, and Fox, not to mention Yahoo! Sports and The Sporting News. People have to find him first before they can read him. It will be incumbent for NBC to pump up the volume for its newest addition.

All writers have an ego. Posnanski didn’t do a piece on Rodriguez, which meanders over three Internet pages, just to have it drift in cyberspace. He wants readers to consume that story.

Financially, I’m sure Posnanski has done very well for himself. As for whether his voice will remain as powerful at NBCSports.com, well, that remains to be seen.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in NBC

NBC Sports Network shut out again? ESPN likely to retain Big East

Remember the scene when the Grinch snares the last crumb from the fireplace, leaving the poor people of Whoville with nothing?

That’s the image I have of ESPN with NBC Sports Network.

It appears as if NBC Sports Network won’t be getting the Big East. Reports are that ESPN is finalizing a deal with the conference.

From ESPN’s Brett McMurphy:

The Big East and ESPN are finalizing a seven-year media rights deal worth $130 million through the 2019-20 school year, league sources told ESPN’s Brett McMurphy on Thursday.

Last week, the Big East received an official offer from NBC Sports Network, but since ESPN is currently the primary rights holder it had one week to match NBC’s offer to retain the Big East’s rights.

ESPN matched the financial aspect, sources said. However, Big East commissioner Mike Aresco must be satisfied ESPN’s deal matches NBC Sports Network’s offer in all facets. Once that is concluded, the Big East presidents must approve the new deal. They could vote on accepting the deal as early as this weekend, sources said.

To compound matters for NBC Sports Network, John Ourand of Street & Smith’s Sports Business Daily reports ESPN ” is likely to sublicense a significant amount of games to other networks, such as Fox Sports, which is launching Fox Sports 1 this summer.”

Fox Sports 1 also is likely to land a TV with the new Catholic 7 schools which are breaking away from the Big East to form its own conference.

Losing the Big East is another blow for NBC Sports Network in its bid to add more high-profile sports programming. Not that the gutted Big East is high profile anymore.

I still think the revised conference might be better on NBC Sports Network, where it would get the No. 1 treatment. It has worked well for the NHL. At ESPN, the Big East will be at the back of the line.

Perhaps the Big East presidents, what’s left of them, will see it that way. However, it doesn’t seem likely.

It appears as if the big bad Grinch, ESPN, has left NBC Sports Network with nothing again.

 

 

 

 

It’s no longer Chicago Tribune Live: Comcast SportsNet talk show move on with new look

The Chicago Tribune had been the title sponsor since 2004. Not anymore.

Yesterday, Comcast Sports Net Chicago announced changes for its daily sports talk show. The biggest is that it won’t have the Chicago Tribune label on it anymore.

From CSN Chicago:

Comcast SportsNet, the television home for the most games and most comprehensive coverage of the Chicago Blackhawks, Bulls, Cubs and White Sox, has announced it will launch SportsTalk Live presented by Smirnoff, a one-hour weeknight sports roundtable discussion show featuring lively debate on the hottest local and national sports topics of the day hosted by David Kaplan.  SportsTalk Live will make its debut on Monday, February 25 at 5:30 PM CT

Airing Monday-Friday at 5:30 PM (with occasional 5:00 PM start times due to live pro event programming), SportsTalk Live will feature a fast-paced, topical format drawing on Kaplan’s always-entertaining and opinionated sports mind, along with some sure-fire spirited debate from a wider range of guests in the local media, national media and entertainment industry.  In addition, a parade of Chicago sports athletes, coaches, and front office execs will also be showcased regularly on SportsTalk Live.

In addition, SportsTalk Live will be making the “viewer” a part of the panel each and every night through a dedicated and enhanced social media fan engagement process through both Twitter and Facebook.  Viewers will be able to interact directly with Kaplan and the show’s guests by posting their thoughts and comments on the network’s Facebook page (Facebook.com/CSNChicago) and via Twitter by sending their messages to @CSNChicago.  Also, fans are urged to utilize the hashtag #ChicagoSportsTalk in their Twitter posts.  Select viewer comments and questions for the panel will be read on the air on every show.

“Our goal for SportsTalk Live is to provide Chicago sports fans with a voice on this show, making them a part of the panel discussion each and every night,” said Phil Bedella, Vice President/General Manager of Comcast SportsNet Chicago.  “Through a wider range of guests, topics and high-energy debates, not to mention our host David Kaplan leading the charge, we’re looking forward to SportsTalk Live being a very entertaining and informative experience for our viewers.”

Added Kaplan: “I look forward to bringing the greatest sports fans in the world an engaging and lively sports debate show that will include the biggest guests and the hottest topics on a nightly basis.”

Indy columnist shoots down Cowherd’s comments about town’s race issues with Pacers

My old New Trier West classmate, Bob Kravitz (at least one of us made good), came out swinging today at Colin Cowherd.

The ESPN radio host, who is prone to making blanket generalizations (see: hockey writers, New Orleans), said the Indiana Pacers don’t sell out their games because Indianapolis has race issues.

“You’re holding an organization to a standard that happens because of race,” Cowherd said. “There’s no other explanation why people don’t go to Pacers games.”

Kravitz, writing for the Indianapolis Star, took offense to the suggestion. He wrote:

This was in 1999-2000, back before Indianapolis became a racist town. The Indiana Pacers, playing their first season at Conseco Fieldhouse, sold out every game.

This was in 2004-05, the season of The Brawl, but still well before Indy turned virulently racist. The Pacers averaged 16,994 fans per game and had more than 13,000 full season ticket holders or season-ticket-holder equivalents.

This was in 2008, before Indy’s latent, simmering racism reared its ugly head. The city, and the state, helped elect Barack Obama to the presidency of the United States, the first time Indiana had gone for a Democratic presidential nominee in decades.

Kravitz pegged the attendance decline on the fallout from that ugly Detroit-Indiana brawl in 2004 followed by several years of bad basketball.

Here’s the big one: The NBA season-ticket-buying culture in Indianapolis is dead, at least for now. That has nothing to do with race. That has everything to do with six years of really bad basketball.

Here’s what Colin doesn’t quite get as he watches from afar in Bristol, Conn. After that 2004-05 season, pro basketball died here in Indianapolis. Ron Artest went crazy. Stephen Jackson, Jamaal Tinsley and others got in trouble. The team made the playoffs, but it was an unlikable team, and the Pacers were forced to trade off all those players in order to change the culture.

The result was five or six years of nice guys who couldn’t play a lick of basketball.

Then Kravitz posed this question:

Atlanta, another city with a pretty good team, doesn’t draw for the Hawks. And that is a much more populated city with a huge black population. Is it race there, too? Do they hate Zaza Pachulia?

Watch out, Atlanta. You could be next.

 

Posted in NBA

Dear Mark Emmert: Why won’t NCAA meet with sports editors, news organizations?

As if Mark Emmert and the NCAA didn’t have enough bad PR problems on its plate, here’s another one: Now the president and the association appear to be ducking the nation’s sports editors.

The Associated Press Sports Editors, joined by other news organizations, wrote a letter last week to Emmert expressing profound frustration over recent NCAA decisions regarding the media. Specifically, they cite the NCAA moving 30 percent of its media seating for the Final Four “away from the court and into locations which make our
coverage of these games more difficult and ultimately less informative to the public.”

There also are issues regarding social media, credentials and access for coverage of football and basketball at various schools and conferences.

The letter says that the APSE and other news organizations have been trying to meet with NCAA officials since last October. Much to their frustration, a meeting has yet to take place.

From the letter:

Unfortunately, our attempts to schedule a meeting – for which representatives of all the undersigned groups are willing to travel to your offices in Indianapolis – have been met with vague promises to schedule something in the future. In fact, we have pursued this meeting on many fronts. Gerry Ahern, the Director of News Content for the USA Today Sports Media Group and president of the Associated Sports Editors, spoke or corresponded with your office on at least three occasions during the same time frame without success.

The letter notes that “our members’ frustrations are rising.” And with good reason. It shouldn’t be that hard to schedule a meeting, especially when the editors and other association leaders are willing to go to the NCAA’s headquarters in Indianapolis to make it happen.

Ahern posted the letter on the APSE website this week. He told his fellow editors: “It’s important that we as APSE members remain diligent in protecting our access and ensuring our ability to provide our audiences with authoritative coverage.”

I followed up with Ahern to see if he had further comment. He preferred to let the letter speak for itself.

I am in the process of contacting the NCAA. However, I can’t imagine a reason other than “We’ve been busy.”

Obviously, that reason isn’t flying with the people who signed the letter.

Here it is:

***********

February 13, 2013

Dr. Mark A. Emmert
President
National Collegiate Athletic Association
P.O. Box 6222
Indianapolis, IN 46206

Dear Dr. Emmert,

The undersigned organizations are writing to express our profound disappointment with
the NCAA’s recent actions affecting journalists’ ability to cover your member
institutions’ activities. We hope to prevent further diminishment of our ability to report
collegiate sports news in cities and towns across the United States. The public’s interest
deserves that we work together to ensure that such coverage is thorough, timely and
benefits schools, students, student-athletes, fans, citizens and news organizations
representing the public.

Recognizing that our mutual interests are best served when we act cooperatively, the
nation’s largest media organizations have repeatedly attempted to explore common
ground on a variety of coverage issues. Our requests over the past three months for a
meeting with you and senior communications officials have been met with delay. During
that time, the NCAA has made significant changes to coverage of the upcoming NCAA
men’s basketball tournament without seeking our input. Additionally, our members are
reporting unduly restrictive credentialing conditions on their use of social media that
inhibit their publishing rights and detrimentally affect the public’s interest in access to
timely information.

In short, our concerns and frustrations are mounting, with a long period of unproductive
interaction leading to this follow up letter. After several relatively minor issues were
resolved on temporary basis, there is a distinct need for a larger discussion.
Tim Franklin, managing editor at Bloomberg News in Washington, who serves as the
American Society of News Editors’ Freedom of Information Co-Chairman, contacted
your office in October on behalf of 10 media groups in order to foster a frank and
positive discussion. We sincerely wanted to create an understanding of each side’s needs
and concerns to avoid further conflict and ensure we are both serving the public interest.
We were excited when your office responded with what appeared to be a similar desire.
Unfortunately, our attempts to schedule a meeting – for which representatives of all the
undersigned groups are willing to travel to your offices in Indianapolis – have been met
with vague promises to schedule something in the future. In fact, we have pursued this
meeting on many fronts. Gerry Ahern, the Director of News Content for the USA Today
Sports Media Group and president of the Associated Sports Editors, spoke or
corresponded with your office on at least three occasions during the same time frame
without success.

We hope you share our interest in working together, and that you’ll set a firm time to do
so in the next few weeks, not months. We recognize the demands on your time are
considerable. But, this is an urgent priority for publishers, editors and journalists, and we
believe that it should be for you, too.

We recently learned that the media seating arrangements for the upcoming NCAA
Tournament have been revised, with as many as 30 percent of the seats previously
available to our members moved away from the court and into locations which make our
coverage of these games more difficult and ultimately less informative to the public.
In addition, conflicts that arose during football season regarding access, credentialing,
and social media are recurring in the basketball season. Rather than providing a
substantive response to these issues, the NCAA has attempted to shift responsibility to
individual schools; while the individual universities, in turn, cite NCAA guidelines as the
rationale for their actions. The result: There is no accountability for policies that infringe
on our work and our publication rights.

While we remain hopeful that these issues can be resolved, our patience is not without
limits, and our members’ frustrations are rising.

We respectfully request that you contact Susan Goldberg or Gerry Ahern
to schedule a meeting.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Susan Goldberg: President, American Society of News Editors

Gerry Ahern: President, Associated Press Sports Editors

Tiffany Shackelford: Executive Director, Association of Alternative Newsmedia

Brad Dennison: President, Associated Press Media Editors

Mike Borland: President, National Press Photographers Association

Caroline Little: President/CEO, Newspaper Association of America

James Brady: President, Online News Association

Bruce Brown: Executive Director, Committee for Freedom of the Press

Sonny Albarado: President, Society of Professional Journalists

Frank LoMonte: Executive Director, Student Press Law Center

Cc:
John Swofford: Commissioner, Atlantic Coast Conference
Bob Bowlsby: Commissioner, Big 12 Conference
Mike Aresco: Commissioner, Big East Conference
James E. Delany: Commissioner, Big Ten Conference
Larry Scott: Commissioner, Pac-12 Conference
Mike Slive: Commissioner, Southeastern Conference

Did you know he still was working? Garagiola retires after 58 years in the booth

Unless you live in Arizona, you probably thought Joe Garagiola retired during the 1980s. So imagine my surprise when after purchasing the Major League Baseball Extra Innings package a few years ago, I heard a familiar voice when I tuned into a Diamondbacks game.

“Is that Joe Garagiola?” I thought.

Sure enough, it was, and he sounded pretty good. It turns out Garagiola has been working on select Arizona games since 1998. Now 87, he decided to call it a career Wednesday.

It’s been quite a run, dating back to 1955 when he started out working on Cardinals games in St. Louis. His partners were Harry Caray and Jack Buck. Now there’s an all-time booth.

Talk about being on hand for baseball history. The clip above features Garagiola doing the open for Game 5 of the 1961 World Series between the Yankees and Reds.

 

 

Posted in MLB

Sara Ganim getting harassed by ‘Paterno Truthers’

Joel Mathis of the Philly Post reports that some of Joe Paterno’s supporters have crossed way over the line. They have targeted Sara Ganim.

Apparently, the “Paterno Truthers” have forgotten that without Ganim’s Pulitzer Prize winning reporting, Jerry Sandusky might be free and capable of doing his unthinkable acts.

At one point, Ganim, now with CNN, tweeted last week about quitting Twitter:

There are really some scary people out there. Absolute nutjobs. Thinking about ditching twitter. Not sure of its value anymore.

Writes Mathis:

Let’s put aside how incredibly tedious, tiresome and unavoidable the “Paterno truther” brigade has become for anyone who dares write (or even tweet) credulously about the downfall of Saint JoePa. What even the truthers should understand is this: Fighting back against Paterno’s critics by using sexually demeaning and degrading language is really not the best way to demonstrate that you have your priorities in the right place when a sex abuse scandal—and the ease with which it was overlooked—is at the heart of the whole neverending mess in the first place.

You don’t have a ton of credibility, truthers, except with each other. You reduce it further every time you call Ganim a “bitch” or suggest she’s been sleeping around. And you reduce it when you keep your silence in the face of such misogyny, just because you don’t like Ganim and her work. All of which will actively short-circuit a renaissance for Paterno’s memory, or Penn State itself.

Yet another reason to be sickened by the entire situation.