This could be bad news for me. I love listening to John Feinstein on Mad Dog Radio via SiriusXM.
Will I be able hear him in Chicago on the new CBS Sports Radio Network? I don’t see Chicago listed among the affliliates. Hopefully soon.
Feinstein is a good catch for CBS, as he joins a lineup that includes Jim Rome, Doug Gottlieb and Scott Ferrall.
From CBS:
CBS Sports Radio today announced it has named John Feinstein as one of the hosts of the network’s weekday programming. Broadcast live from 9:00AM-12:00PM, ET, “The John Feinstein Show” will feature commentary on the world of sports from the man who has covered most of the major–and many of the not-so-major–events in the world of sports during his more than 30 years as a sportswriter. The show will be heard on over 50 stations nation-wide, including many in major markets. In addition to his role as host, Feinstein will continue to contribute his personalized musings on the world of sports to the hourly “CBS Sports Minute” feature heard on CBS Sports Radio stations.
CBS Sports Radio will make its 24/7 debut on Wednesday, January 2, 2013. It was previously announced that The Jim Rome Show will be broadcast weekdays from 12:00Noon-3:00PM ET, Doug Gottlieb will serve as host of afternoons 3:00-6:00PM, while Scott Ferrall will lead the evening’s “Ferrall on the Bench” from 10:00PM-2:00AM on CBS Sports Radio.
“John is known for his encyclopedic knowledge of and passion for all aspects of sports,” said Eric Spitz, Director of Programming, CBS Sports Radio. “As a best-selling sports author and journalist, he has relationships with, and an open line to, some of the most fascinating names in sports. John has a way with words, a trademark sense of humor and is never is shy to offer an opinion, which will engage listeners and translate on the radio.”
Last night, my bedtime reading was the latest edition of Sports Illustrated. Not on my Ipad, but the actual magazine.
With the news that Newsweek is ceasing to publish in a magazine format, it made me wonder how long that also would be the case for SI?
I think we’re still years away from SI becoming completely digital. Then again, this week’s edition felt thin and the magazine recently made some cuts in staff. Also, new initiatives seem to be geared toward the online experience.
SI seemed to say as much by appointing Paul Fichtenbaum, who for eight years ran Sports Illustrated’s Web site, as the new editor of the Time Inc. Sports Group. He replaces Terry McDonell.
Fichtenbaum told Richard Sandomir of the New York Times:
“Everything going forward has to have a digital overlay to it because that’s where the industry is going,” Mr. Fichtenbaum said in a telephone interview. “We have a really strong print product, a lot of subscribers — more than three million who love the magazine — and what we need to do is make sure they love SI in whatever form the world takes us. Our magazine is rock solid.”
Later, Sandomir wrote:
Mr. Fichtenbaum said that the print magazine would further extend its efforts in enterprise journalism, while letting SI.com handle daily sports news. “That’s one of the things we can do to differentiate ourselves from our competitors,” he said. “The magazine can do those interesting, unique stories that are hard to come by.”
I hope the magazine remains viable. Call me old-school, but the pictures look better in print. And I like the feel of a magazine in my hands.
Yes, it is hard to imagine SI disappearing as a magazine. Then again, 10 years ago, who would have thought Newsweek as a magazine would be on its way out in 2012?
Doug Gottlieb is ready to roll on his new gig with CBS. Monday, he will debut a new show, Lead Off, on CBS Sports Network. Airing at Midnight ET, the nightly program will focus on the next day’s conversation in sports (Details below).
Also, Gottlieb soon will have an afternoon show on the new CBS Sports Radio Network and he will be part of CBS’ NCAA tournament coverage.
Now that he has reached the top, it seems to be a good time to reflect on how he got started. Gottlieb has come a long way since his days as a guard at Oklahoma State. Even back then, he was thinking about a career in broadcasting.
In the latest edition of My First Job, Gottlieb recalls his first jobs in the business and how he was just slightly off on his first prediction about a back up quarterback named Tom Brady.
*******
When I was in school, I did some guest-hosting with Jim Traber in Oklahoma City. Then when I got out, I filled him for him. I got $100 per show, and $200 for a remote.
Also, I went on Jim Rome’s show as his college basketball analyst. Todd Wright at ESPN always had me on his all-night show.
My first show for ESPN Radio was filling in for Todd. They wanted him to go to Bristol the first week after 9/11. He wouldn’t go on a plane, so they asked me.
I watched all the (NFL) games on that Sunday. Drew Bledsoe got hurt that day. I said, ‘That’s it. The Patriots are finished. They can’t win with a quarterback who never played before.’ I had never heard of Tom Brady. So much for that prediction.
After I was done playing, ESPN called and asked if I wanted to do an audition. My first game was with Dave Revsine. It was Colorado-UNC Charlotte. We thought we killed it. We emptied our notebooks and gave everything we had.
When we got back, (a top executive) said, “You guys were horrible. You talked too much. You talked over each other.”
OK, that’s a nice start.
I eventually got on TV at ESPNNews. Then I did some stuff at ESPNU. I did a month of shows I believe nobody ever saw. Literally, there was one show where the lights went out on camera. But we kept going with the lights off. It was a memorable night, to say the least.
******
Here are the details of Gottlieb’s new show from CBS:
CBS Sports Network’s new live, late night show, LEAD OFF, which will air weekdays from 12:00-1:00 AM, ET, debuts Monday, Oct. 22. The show has added Allie LaForce as co-host, teaming with Doug Gottlieb. LEAD OFF will feature commentary and debate on the top stories and news with a focus on the next day’s conversation.
Gottlieb and LaForce will lead off together this week as contributors on ROME, which airs on CBS Sports Network from 6:00-6:30 PM, ET.
LaForce previously worked for Fox 8 News inCleveland,Ohioas a sports anchor, as well as a color analyst and sideline reporter for the regional sports network SportsTimeOhio. She also has been a studio host covering the Mid-American Conference and various high school championships.
LaForce graduated magna cum laude from Ohio University’s Honors Tutorial College with a degree in Broadcast Journalism. She was a member of theOhioUniversitywomen’s basketball team for two years, before leaving to start her broadcasting career. In 2005, LaForce was named Miss Teen USA, the first winner from the state of Ohio.
LEAD OFF will provide perspective on the sports news of the day, advancing the storylines fans will be discussing in the morning. The show will serve as the first opportunity for sports fans to discuss and debate, ‘What’s next?’, while featuring a mix of live guests, highlights, energetic debate and commentary from Gottlieb, LaForce and others, reacting tothe biggest stories and events of the day, with a targeted focus on the hot topics and tomorrow’s headlines.
LEAD OFF will be produced by dick clark productions, and originate from CBS Sports Network’s Orange County, California-based studio.
Bill Simmons’ dream continues to get better. The NBA junkie now will be talking hoops with Magic Johnson as part of ESPN’s revamped NBA Countdown.
In are Simmons and Jalen Rose. Out are Jon Barry and Chris Broussard. Remaining are Johnson and Michael Wilbon.
ESPN felt like the show needed some tweaks. Simmons, who has his hands on pretty much everything at ESPN, obviously is seen as an upgrade with his unique perspective.
Thanks to the magic of video, here are Simmons and Rose talking about being “teammates.”
For those who prefer reading, here are some quotes:
“I think the four of us will be able to have good conversations,” Simmons said. “We’re all going to say what we’re thinking. I’m better playing off other people and I think Jalen is the same way and I know Magic is the same way — all four of us can do that. At the same time we want the show to have a level of sophistication.”
Mark Gross, ESPN senior vice-president and executive producer for content said:
“The unique, diverse perspectives of our new commentator team fit perfectly with the show’s free-flowing format. Bill brings a deep knowledge of the league past and present, an entertaining style and an ability to articulate his inventive thoughts from a fan’s point of view. Jalen’s lengthy playing experience and his strong, informed opinions will give fans great insight into how and why things happen on the court. They join a team that includes one of the greatest players of all time and one of our most versatile and engaging commentators.”
Skip Bayless has a tremendous story about Joe Namath’s retirement. When we worked at the Chicago Tribune, I was like a kid, asking him to retell it like some favorite old tale.
Well, it just so happens that Namath played his last game 35 years ago this week. As this classic Monday Night Football video below shows, he was dreadful, throwing four interceptions in the Rams’ loss to the Bears.
To mark the occasion, I thought it was a good time to share Bayless’ story. Here’s Skip:
*******
I did sidebars (for the Los Angeles Times) on their game-days. We had a mutual friend. He put in a good word for me with Namath.
Namath hated the media. He was at war with the New York media and soon was at war with the LA media. He wouldn’t talk with anybody. He’d do a brief post-game. He’d hang his head, barely speak.
After the first exhibition game, I went to him. I said, “Joe, Skip Bayless.” He immediately lit up. “Joel told me,” he said.
So I hit it off with him. During the year, I’d get little scoops nobody else could get.
It ended very badly for him. Both of his knees were shot. He played only four games and lost his job to Pat Haden and Ron Jaworski. Their season ended very badly with a home playoff loss in the rain to Minnesota.
On Monday, I was sent to the Rams facility just to do a wrap-up. I walked in the lockerroom and it was mostly empty except for Namath. He was cleaning out his locker. I walked over, and I said, “You look like you’re leaving.”
He said, “I’m retiring. I’m done, man.”
I said, “Can I write it?”
He said, “Sure. You can have it.”
I said, “Can you talk about it now?”
He said, “I’m busy. Let’s meet in a couple hours. We’re having a little party (at some bar).” It was a California fern bar.
I run to the phone. I called my boss. I was like a son to him. He said, “This is huge. They are holding Page 1 for you.”
I show up and they’re already rolling. He’s got a bunch of friends I’ve never seen before. They were really close. They weren’t football people. They were already into their cups.
He had saved me a seat right next to him. He said, “What are you drinking?”
Quick back story: I came from a double alcoholic background. Both of my parents were wrecks. My grandparents were wrecks. My mother’s brother died of cirrhosis of the liver. My whole family was riddled with alcohol.
I had been told I had a genetic predisposition to alcohol. I’m obsessive compulsive. So I always avoid alcohol.
I just got married to my high school sweetheart. I was in a business fueled by alcohol. She always said, “If you have to, just order a red wine. Take a couple of sips and you’ll be OK.”
I start to nervously sip the red wine and try to take notes. I sipped through a whole glass of wine. The waitress immediately put down a second glass. I had no conscious thought of any danger.
Finally, I said, ‘Joe, I’ve got to run.’ As we stood up to shake hands–and I am not exaggerating one bit–I fell backwards into a man seated next to me. And then I fell on the floor.
Joe Namath stood over me and looked me right in the eye, and said, “Son, you’re drunk.”
I said, “No, I’m not.”
He said, “What do you plan to do?
I said, “I plan to go write my story.”
He said, “Are you going to drive?”
I said, ‘Yes.”
He said, “No, you can’t drive.”
He helped me to my feet. I felt my way out of the bar and called my boss. He knew I had issues with alcohol. I said, “Bill, you won’t believe this, but I’m drunk.”
I quickly told him the story. He did not chuckle.
OK, what are we going to do? I was in no condition to write anything. He asked, “What are the odds the Los Angeles Herald-Examiner has this story?”
I said, “I had no hint at all, but Joe despises everyone but me.”
“What if we hold the story?” he said.
I said, “I’ll give you 99.9 percent chance it’ll survive.”
He said, “OK, let’s hold it for a day.”
Sure enough, Joe didn’t say anything. And the next day, we had our story.
A new sports programming initiative is trying to target kids where they live. And it isn’t necessarily television.
The Whistle recently was launched as a multi-platform vehicle hoping to snare the large portion of the 70 million kids in the U.S. (ages 6 to 16) who like sports. Programming will be geared towards them.
As co-founder Jeff Urban says, The Whistle hopes to be the bridge between ESPN and Nickelodeon.
“Our partners and I were watching media through the eyes of our kids,” Urban said. “The news cycle is so loud and in your face. When all the Brett Favre stuff was breaking a few years ago, my 9-year-old turned to me and said, ‘Daddy, what’s sexting?’
“We thought we could come up with a way to deliver good sports content to kids in an age-appropriate manner.”
The Whistle recently made its TV debut with a Friday afternoon show (4 p.m. ET) on the NBC Sports Network. The first shows featured Aaron Rodgers, Eli Manning, Ray Rice, and Henrik Lindqvist. The Whistle has content agreements with NFL Films, U.S. Soccer, U.S. Olympic Committee, among others.
However, television isn’t going to be the main vehicle for this enterprise. Rather, the drivers for now are a website, a youtube channel (featuring the clip above from the Harlem Globetrotters) and a distribution deal for the channel to be seen through X-Box Live.
The Whistle has hit on something. My 15-year-old lives on X-Box. My 17-year-old burns a hole through his computer while the TV is playing in the background.
“Our aim isn’t to develop a linear channel,” Urban said. “It is one point of distribution. However, these kids are creating their own channels. Those channels aren’t defined the same way you and I are used to defining them. They are using their aps, going to websites.
“We think this is a way to have the content live and breath in ways in which all your kids are engaged.”
The concept sounds interesting. However, I told Urban that kids are very sophisticated these days. They want to hear what Tony Kornheiser and Mike Wilbon have to say on PTI after school. My son’s friend goes crazy for Stephen A. Smith. By 11 or 12, they know what “sexting” is, and much, much more.
I asked Urban, what kind of content are you going to produce to lure those kids away from ESPN?
“ESPN has a 35-year head start,” Urban said. “We’re not looking to compete with ESPN. What we have to do is entertain and engage kids with good authentic sports content. What we’ve seen thus far is that the leagues and partners are willing to play ball with us. They understand the need to develop a youth market and content that is engaging and age appropriate.
“We’re not going to swing every 10-year-old to come over from ESPN to us. But if we can get some of them to try us, then we can grow and build with the next generation of sports fans.”
No surprise. Bob Brenly informed the Cubs today he won’t return to their TV booth in 2013. He is expected to become the new analyst for the Arizona. Brenly lives in the Phoenix area and guided the Diamondbacks to the 2001 World Series title.
So who’s in line to replace Brenly?
Rick Sutcliffe: I think he’d be No. 1 on the Cubs’ wish list. The big righthander would be ideal. However, he has a great national gig with ESPN, and I’d be surprised if he wanted to do a full slate of games. Still, it doesn’t hurt to ask.
Dan Plesac: After Sutcliffe, I’d expect the Cubs to take a long look at Plesac. He’s from the Chicago area; pitched for the Cubs; and did studio work for them at Comcast SportsNet Chicago. He’s excellent as an analyst for MLB Network. If he’s interested, he would be a terrific fit for the Cubs.
Kerry Wood: In my haste to do this last night, I didn’t include the recently retired pitcher. Judging from Twitter, he would be a popular choice in Cubs nation. However, a couple of things factor against him. According to Bruce Levine of ESPNChicago.com, Wood wants to spend time with his family and likely won’t be interested in a 150-plus game grind.
And here’s the key point: Does he have enough personality to help carry a telecast? He was a valiant warrior, to be sure. But colorful? Not exactly. I think he’s still a longshot.
Mitch Williams: Another former Cub who has shined on MLB Network.
Doug Glanville: Former Cub, who is bright, insightful on ESPN.
Todd Hollandsworth: Could the Comcast SportsNet studio analyst for the Cubs move up to the broadcast booth? Perhaps.
Steve Stone: Nope. He said he is returning to the Sox for 2013. Also, I don’t think the Cubs want to go down that road again.
Mark Grace: His personal problems are the reason why there’s an opening in Arizona. Too much baggage for the Cubs to take him on now.
Dennis Eckersley: The Hall of Famer has the former Cubs connection. Does studio work for Red Sox and TBS. Just throwing his name out there.
An analyst from another team: I don’t think it is a must for the team to hire a former Cub. Aside from a short radio stint in the early 90s, Brenly wasn’t a Cubs guy. And he worked out terrific.
An inexperienced analyst: Besides Wood, don’t think the Cubs will go with a first-timer unless they are really, really sure it will work. I reference the name below.
Joe Carter: How about a second chance? Right. Don’t think so.
Update: A judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by former UCLA basketball player Reeves Nelson against SI. Details below.
**********
Tyrann Mathieu is on cover of this week’s Sports Illustrated. However, it is not exactly the way he envisioned.
A piece written by Thayer Evans and Pete Thamel focuses on the personal problems that have the LSU star on the sidelines this year. It contains some allegations that Mathieu might have broken some NCAA rules. It could derail a return to LSU next year.
The most interesting part of the piece is that it includes quotes from his father, who is serving a life sentence in prison for murder.
Mathieu declined to be interviewed in the story and claims SI harrassed him. From Fox 8 in New Orleans:
Sheila Mathieu calls the article “unfortunate” and says she can’t understand why Sports Illustrated would respond so viciously to a family’s decision to keep private matters private.
“They twisted things and cobbled together details from past articles because we wouldn’t sit down with them,” she told FOX 8 Sports. “We have always believed in being a tight-knit family. God first, family second, work and school third. That’s what Tyrann is doing now, and he’s on an avenue to success, making good grades and putting his life in order.”
A Mathieu family lawyer wrote SI, asking the magazine to leave him alone.
Demand is made that you cease and desist from any attempts at making contact with Mr. Mathieu or any member of his family.
There also are allegations that Sports Illustrated tried to bribe a promoter to get damaging material about Mathieu. Knowing SI, I have to say that notion is ridiculous.
Here’s Sports Illustrated’s response:
Sports Illustrated stands behind the reporting and the facts of the story. These absurd allegations are completely fabricated and with obvious motive.
Thamel did a podcast with SI’s Richard Deitsch. Thamel said that even though Mathieu isn’t playing, he still is “the most interesting player in college football.”
“People are fascinated by Tyrann Mathieu,” Thamel said.
Thamel didn’t discuss the allegations by Mathieu in the podcast. He said he and Evans covered the story through interviews and by using their sources at LSU.
*******
Meanwhile, in other legal news involving the magazine, Nelson won’t get his day in court against SI. From the San Marino Tribune:
A judge today tossed a defamation lawsuit brought by former UCLA basketball player Reeves Nelson against Time Inc., the parent company of Sports Illustrated, and a reporter concerning an article critical of the player and the Bruin program.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Murphy agreed with attorneys for the media conglomerate and reporter George Dohrmann that the complaint concerning the Sports Illustrated story “Not the UCLA Way” infringed on their clients’ right to free speech. She also found that Dohrmann had numerous sources to back up the facts in his article.
“This man spent a lot of time and talked to a lot of people,” Murphy said.
Nelson’s attorney, Olaf Muller, declined to comment outside the courtroom. He argued during the hearing that Murphy was incorrect in her finding that Nelson, although a college athlete at the time, was nonetheless a limited public figure who had to demonstrate that Sports Illustrated and Dohrmann acted with malice toward him.
Muller said Nelson was an amateur who did not even have a publicist.
Defense attorney Daniel Petrocelli also declined to comment.
GQ has jumped on the Jeremy Lin train. He is on the cover of the November issue.
There’s hardly any guarantee that Lin, now with Houston, will continue to be the sensation that he was last year. So why wait? Let’s slap him on the cover while he still has some steam.
For now, everyone still wants a piece of Lin. I loved the headline that ran on Boston.com: “Harvard’s Lin covers GQ.”
Yes, Harvard. Isn’t that everyone’s first association when they think of Lin? I suppose that’s the case in Boston.
Even Lin questions how long this will last.
“People are always saying, ‘He’s only started twenty-five games, there’s so many uncertainties.’ And I agree. I totally agree. I don’t know how my next season’s going to turn out. The things that I struggled with before last year, I’m going to struggle with next year — there’s that learning process. . . . I’m not like the next Michael Jordan, but I’m also not what everyone saw me as before I started playing in the NBA, either.”
You’re missing out if you’re not watching the A Football Life series on NFL Network. These documentaries, which air every Wednesday night this fall, are among the best ever produced by NFL Films, and you know that’s saying something.
The next A Football Life focuses on the complicated life of Steve McNair (Wednesday, 8 p.m. ET). The former Tennessee Titans quarterback was a valiant warrior on the field, and was considered a role model off the field.
Yet the tragic end of his life–murdered by his mistress–muddied the portrait of a man who died too young.
NFL Films producer Chip Swain does a nice job of showing the strong ties McNair had with his family and friends and their emotions about his shocking death. You see it all through the eyes of his mother, brothers, and former teammates. At the end, there’s even a passage with his children, who requested to be included after the initial production was nearly complete.
The film left me with a feeling of “Yeah, but…” As in, yeah, McNair had many wonderful attributes, but….
I had a chance to talk with Swain yesterday. Here’s my Q/A.
What was your approach to this documentary?
When you’re given an assignment for A Football Life, they say you’re doing a story on Steve McNair, go. You have to figure out his story, how were going to handle his death, who can we get to talk about him. We decided early on this show wasn’t going to be on the details of his death. Ultimately, we found the impact of his life and death and how it affected people was more interesting.
Why did you go in that direction?
Dateline did an hour about the murder and the relationship McNair had with the woman. To try to get where he was psychologically (at the time of his death) would be pure speculation. Nobody knew the truth. That wasn’t what this show was going to be about.
We were going to try to define his impact as a football player. After all, we are NFL Films. We knew (the murder) would have to be put out there, but it wasn’t going to be the basis for the show.
Part of it was we wanted the cooperation of his family, the blessing of his wife, and the people who were closest to him, to help tell the story. If we were going to go at it from a scandalous way, I don’t know if those people would have come on board with that.
How do you expect people will react to the film?
When you look at Steve, he had a model NFL career, and yet the way he died was not consistent with who everyone thought he was.
In the back half of the story, you see people reacting to the news (his death) almost in real time. The way it unfolds in the show, they’re almost processing the thoughts the same way the viewer is processing them. ‘This is not right; this isn’t consistent with the guy we knew.’
One of his friends said, ‘The substance of a man is so important.’ But Steve’s substance didn’t mesh with how he passed away. Exploring that as best we could was an interesting challenge for us.
We’re not trying to pass any judgement, one way or another. We want viewers to take out of it what they want.
McNair’s mother and brothers appeared on the show. However, his wife, Mechelle didn’t.
We contacted her early on, but didn’t hear from her. Eventually, I sat down with her for an hour in mid-August. I told her what we were doing and how it came from a place of respect. She listened, but let me know she wouldn’t do an interview.
How did it come about that McNair’s children appeared in the film?
Just before the film was completed, I sent (Mechelle) a copy. I wanted her to know what was in it. She watched it with her kids. She called us and said, ‘They want to be in the film.’ I said, ‘We can make that happen.’
Mechelle was there when we did the interviews. I asked her, ‘Are you OK with them being interviewed?’ She said she was very appreciative. It meant a lot to me to get her blessing.