Bold talk from Fox: Buck says network will “push” golf coverage

If you thought Fox would tread gingerly into this golf thing, well, you don’t know Fox.

During a teleconference to officially unveil Joe Buck and Greg Norman as its 18th hole announcers, the Fox gang was typically bold in discussing their plans for golf. The network takes over the U.S. Open and other USGA events in 2015.

“I think I’ve been here long enough to know that today is a big day for Fox Sports,” Buck said. “It says a lot about the USGA that they are willing to take this leap with us. Like I told [USGA President] Tom O’Toole, who I’ve known pretty much my whole life, he is going to be blown away, as will the golf world, with the effort and the ability that we’re going to throw at this. We’ll push golf coverage like Fox Sports pushed NFL coverage, MLB coverage and NASCAR coverage. It’s a good partnership both ways.”

Mark Loomis, Fox’s new coordinating producer for golf, also showed he is quick to learn how Fox operates.

“Fox Sports has proven over the years that we can always push technology to the next step, so I think there will be some real interesting opportunities for us to look at before we go on air,” Loomis said. “The other aspect is taking a fresh approach to golf coverage with a fresh group of people. Any time you put together a group that hasn’t been together before, you don’t have a ‘this is how we do it’ mentality; you have a ‘what’s the best way to do it’ mentality. That starts with the booth and goes all the way down to production and engineering, so I’m really excited for the next year to see how it grows. Our philosophy is to cover the event and to find new ways to tell the story.”

The “new ways” are exactly what have golf fans apprehensive about Fox landing the U.S. Open. New doesn’t always equate to better. Golf, in particular, is a sport that doesn’t welcome much deviation from the way it has been traditionally presented on television.

Fox Sports president Eric Shanks did try to assure everyone that the network won’t utilize a glowing golf ball.

“First and foremost, you respect the sport,” Shanks said. “If you remember when we first got the NFL, a lot of people were thinking that we were going to come in and do something completely different. There was talk about having Bart Simpson in the booth calling the games, and we went out and got John Madden and Pat Summerall…First and foremost it’s about the event, and there is no way that FOX Sports’ brand or FOX Sports’ attitude is going to be put above the USGA and the US Open brand.”

Fox has more than a year to determine its exact coverage. And it still has a long way to go. Unlike the other sports, golf requires multiple announcers and analysts. The network still has many, many hires to fill out the rest of team. They will be vitally important if this enterprise is going to be a success.

 

 

NFL on ESPN: Quality up from previous years; Still several potential clunkers

ESPN can’t help but be envious of NBC. The quality of the Sunday games always are better than Monday night; Seattle and Denver are scheduled for only one ESPN game compared to three on NBC

The lack of the flex option also leaves ESPN in the danger zone. Last year, it got stuck with 0-8 Tampa Bay vs. Miami in November, and 4-11 Atlanta at San Francisco for its season finale.

Still, ESPN has to be pleased with its 2014 schedule. The quality seems to be better than in recent years.

Best games: Philadelphia at Indianapolis in week 2; New England visits Kansas City in week 4. Seattle travels to Washington in week 5 when the Redskins still should be relevant. Carolina at Philadelphia in week 10 could be intriguing.

The NFL also will subject Mike Tirico and Jon Gruden to our lovely December weather in the upper Midwest: Atlanta at Green Bay in week 14 and New Orleans at Chicago in week 15. I’m cold already.

Potential clunkers: ESPN has only one shot at Peyton Manning; its season finale when Denver travels to Cincinnati in week 16. You never know what you’re going to get with the Bengals. Miami at Jets on Dec. 1 has potential roadkill written all over it. Houston at Steelers on Oct. 20 could be decidedly underwhelming.

 

 

 

 

NFL on CBS: Expected better for Thursday night debut on network

With the NFL schedule coming out, everyone was interested to see what kind of games CBS got with its new early-season Thursday night package.

Frankly, I expected better, considering CBS busted up its Thursday night primetime package to air these games. I thought the NFL would give the network a blockbuster-type match-up to launch the series in week 2.

Instead, CBS will air Pittsburgh at Baltimore. Yes, it is an intense rivalry game, but both teams missed the playoffs last year and could be on the slide. It hardly is a “wow” game.

******

Here’s a breakdown of CBS’ Thursday night package:

Best games: Not really much that is overwhelming. Probably the best is San Diego at Denver in week 8. It has a couple other traditional rivalry games in Giants at Washington in week 4 and Minnesota at Green Bay in week 5. However, of those four teams, only Green Bay made the playoffs in 2014.

Potential Clunkers: I know every team has to play a Thursday game, but Tampa Bay at Atlanta in week 3 doesn’t seem to worthy of primetime so early in the season. Indianapolis is at Houston in week 6, meaning CBS is rooting for the Texans to draft Johnny Manziel.

The Jets at New England probably will do a decent rating, but the Rex Ryan’s dysfunctional team doesn’t do much for me.

Here is a breakdown of CBS’ regular-season package.

Best games: Naturally, CBS will ride the Peyton Manning train with its first two doubleheader weekends: KC at Denver in week 2 and then a Super Bowl rematch with Denver at Seattle in week 3.

In week 9, it has another installment of Brady vs. Manning with Denver at New England. Also like Patriots at Green Bay in week 13.

Potential clunkers: Indy-Pittsburgh is slated for the doubleheader window in week 8. Never know how those teams will fare. In week 16, Indianapolis at Dallas is the showcase game for now. Obviously, that could change.

Note: Interesting to note that there is a new “cross flex” option this year, giving the NFL the flexibility to put a NFC game on CBS and visa versa for AFC and Fox. The idea is to better balance the distribution of quality games between CBS and Fox.

As a result, on Thanksgiving, CBS will air Chicago-Detroit. Philadelphia at Dallas will be on Fox.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in CBS

NFL on Fox: Banking on Dallas to be good; 5 doubleheader games for Cowboys

If you thought NBC did the highest ratings for the NFL on Sunday, you’re wrong. Fox Sports’ NFC doubleheader package, which it markets as “America’s Game of the Week,” is No. 1; last year, it averaged 27.2 million viewers per telecast.

Fox is ready to cash in again.

Best games: Fox will go all-in with Seattle and San Francisco.  Fox opens with a San Francisco at Dallas doubleheader game in week 1. Cowboys at Seattle on Oct. 12. Seahawks at Philadelphia on Dec. 7. Obviously, Seattle at San Francisco on Dec. 14 could be huge.

Potential clunkers: Fox also is going all-in on the Cowboys. Dallas is slated to appear in five doubleheader games. If the Cowboys are underwhelming, a definite possibility, Fox will have to adjust.

Fox also has the Giants featured in several doubleheader games, including a trip to Seattle on Nov. 9. By then, New York could be done, forcing Fox to audible.

Bottom line: Fox could use good years from both Dallas and the Giants.

 

NFL on NBC: The winner and still champ; Great games and can start to flex in week 5

Today, I will be breaking down who got what gifts (and potential clunkers) from the NFL.

NBC

The winner always is NBC. The traditionally strong Sunday night package will be even stronger this year. The network now will have the option of beginning to flex in week 5, giving Al Michaels and Cris Collinsworth an even better chance to call bigger games.

Best games: On paper, they all are pretty good, and some are excellent, starting with Green Bay at Seattle to kick off the season on Thursday night, Sept. 4.

Then NBC quickly jumps on the Peyton Manning train, with his former Indianapolis Colts team visiting Denver for the opening Sunday night game.

The following week, NBC will open San Francisco’s new Levi Stadium with Chicago at 49ers. Local knowledge: Beware of a blowout, because the Bears never play well in San Fran.

NBC definitely won’t be flexing in week 7 with San Francisco at Denver. And it has a huge Thanksgiving night game with San Francisco at Seattle.

And for good measure, NBC has the Bears-Packers game in Lambeau in week 10. The traditional rivalry game always does well in prime time.

And there’s much more. Here is link to their schedule.

Potential clunkers: Actually, this category should be renamed, potential flex candidates. The most likely to be flexed appears to be Seattle at Arizona in week 16. You never know what you’re going to get with the Cardinals.

Maybe Dallas at Giants in week 12 if both teams are in the dumps, which is possible. However, even both teams are winless, NBC still might show the game because the networks loves the Cowboys and all things New York.

With flex scheduling, though, NBC never will get a clunker on Sunday night.

Next: CBS

 

 

NFL on NFL Network: Not so attractive helping of Jags, Bills, Browns, Raiders in second half

The NFL Network is along for the ride this year. CBS will air the first seven Thursday night games with a simulcast on NFL Network.

Then NFL Network will air the remaining Thursday night games exclusively in the second half of the season. However, CBS still will handle the production with Jim Nantz and Phil Simms on the call.

NFL rules mandate all teams play a Thursday game. As a result, the NFL Network slate has several potholes.

Best games: Not much. New Orleans at Carolina on Oct. 30 looks good. Dallas at Chicago on Dec. 4 has some potential.

Potential clunkers: Where to begin? Cleveland at Cincinnati on Nov. 6; Buffalo at Miami on Nov. 13; Kansas City at Oakland on Nov. 20.

And the best thing that can be said about the Tennessee at Jacksonville game on Dec. 18 is that the weather should be nice in Florida.

 

Women at work: Burke shines as ESPN analyst in NBA playoffs; only female announcer in pro baseball looks to make mark

A couple observations about women getting their shots in sports media:

******

Saturday, I tuned into the Atlanta-Indiana playoff game on ESPN. Mark Jones called the game with Doris Burke serving as his analyst.

As usual, Burke was spot on with her analysis. She knows the game and is terrific in breaking it down.

Nothing new here, which is just the point. A female analyst  for a NBA playoff game doesn’t qualify as news anymore. Oh, I’m sure there were detractors on Twitter, likely the same people who still are upset that women got the vote.

But thankfully, there’s a been-there-done-that element to this story. That’s a good thing.

Burke’s next game as an analyst will be Thunder-Grizzles on Saturday night.

*******

Shortly after listening to Burke, I read Manny Randhawa’s story at the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana on the only woman announcer in pro baseball. Randhawa writes:

She’s the only female play-by-play broadcaster of any affiliated professional baseball team in the country. And take note of her name, because you could be hearing a lot more of it in the years to come.

Kirsten Karbach is the play-by-play voice of the Clearwater Threshers, the Class-A affiliate of the Philadelphia Phillies. She graduated with a mass communications degree in 2013 from the University of South Florida, where she gained experience in production and broadcasting.

Later he writes:

Karbach has her sights set high, and hopes to continue breaking barriers in the world of play-by-play broadcasting along her path. A job calling major league baseball is her ultimate goal.

“That would be the ultimate goal, definitely,” Karbach said of reaching the big league booth. “I’m really happy where I am now, but if I was looking into the future, I’d just hopefully progress in minor league baseball and get to the big leagues, because baseball is definitely what I’d like to be doing. I like broadcasting in general, but baseball is where my knowledge is and where my experience is, and definitely where I want to be.”

For all the aspiring female broadcasters out there, Karbach has a word of advice.

“For female aspiring broadcasters in particular, I would just say, don’t think it’s something that you can’t do,” she said. “Because when I was a broadcaster at my student station, a lot of the girls that came in wanted to do sideline reporting. Not a lot of them wanted to attempt to do color and play-by-play. I personally think that sideline reporting is where the standard is set and that’s why a lot of them aspire to that, but if they like doing play-by-play, they shouldn’t think they can’t.

“Because they can. And it’s awesome.”

During the winter, I taught a graduate level sports journalism class at DePaul. I had five aspiring women sports journalists in the class.

I thought of them as I watched Burke and read the story about the young woman baseball announcer. Throughout the class, I kept telling my students the opportunities are there if you want it bad enough.

Burke and Karbach prove my point.

 

No Magic interview, no problem: Pearlman’s ‘Showtime’ shows access isn’t essential to telling complete story

My latest column for the National Sports Journalism Center is on Jeff Pearlman and his approach to writing his new book on the ’80s Lakers, Showtime.

********

Today’s journalism lesson comes from Jeff Pearlman.

Subject: How to write a 482-page book without ever getting access to the three main characters in the story.

Pearlman’s latest, “Showtime,” is a detailed and entertaining account of the great Lakers teams during the ‘80s. He chronicles the wild ride as Magic Johnson, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar and the crew piled up victories on the court and in the bedroom. The Lakers were at the center of ‘80s flash and excess.

Pearlman conducted nearly 300 interviews for the book, but he never was able to land a one-on-one with Johnson and coach Pat Riley. He also didn’t have a sit-down with

Abdul-Jabbar, although he was able to ask some questions of him through a third party.

Writing a book without gaining access to the main sources happens all the time. However, Pearlman’s process in getting around that obstacle is illuminating. If anything, he says, it almost played to his advantage that the stars and coach didn’t talk.

Here is my Q/A with Pearlman:

What is your approach?

Pearlman: I’ve probably read 700 sports books beginning when I was a kid. I just think what separates the good ones from the great ones ‑‑ I’m not saying I’m great– but as a reader what separates the good ones from the great one, is the details. You flip through some books where it’s just obvious after obvious after obvious. The first thing I do when I read books now is I go to the acknowledgment section. Whenever I see an author’s list of people he talked to and it’s less than 200 people, I usually think, ‘Oh, I have that beat.’ I just think you have to call everyone, absolutely everyone. I’m not going to get everyone to talk, but I did try.

Does Earl Jones fall in that category? You devoted several amusing pages to this terrible No. 1 pick who played only two games for the Lakers.

Pearlman: Earl Jones was my gold medal for this book. He went to University of District of Columbia, and the media relations guy had no idea where he was; none of his teammates knew where he was. Eventually someone tipped me off and I found him in West Virginia. I think he was unemployed. When I got him on the cell, I said, ‘Are you Earl Jones? He said, ‘Yeah.’ I went, ‘My God, I’m so happy to be talking to you.’ I’m sure he thought he was talking to the craziest guy in the world. But to me, it’s this euphoria. I love tracking people down and finding them. Funny, when I started my career, I was the worst reporter. I didn’t even care about reporting, and now it’s my favorite part of the whole gig.

Why wouldn’t Johnson and Riley talk to you?

Pearlman: According to Magic’s guy, he and Riley are doing a book together.

What was the situation with Abdul-Jabbar?

Pearlman: I got Kareem in a very weird way. Kareem has a publicist who is very difficult, and I didn’t get him. Then I have a friend who’s an editor of Slam magazine, and Slam was actually doing a sit‑down with Kareem. My friend said, ‘Give me the questions you want me to ask Kareem and I’ll ask him for you.’ I was able to get my questions asked, but I was unable to get him one-on-one.

Were you concerned about going forward with a book without talking to these key characters?

Pearlman: The thing is I have to say: Magic has written four books. Kareem wrote two books. Riley has written multiple books. They weren’t under any obligation to talk to me. You would prefer to speak to these people, but I would take (Lakers reserve guard) Wes Matthews two hours in a diner over Magic Johnson two hours in a diner. I feel like the stories are fresh and they haven’t been told.

Everyone told me I had to talk to Wanda Cooper (Michael Cooper’s ex-wife). She was incredibly blunt and candid.

Is it about context? Do the other people give you that insight that maybe the big stars wouldn’t give you?

Pearlman: Yeah. It kind of showed itself (in “Sweetness,” his biography on Walter Payton). I called every draftee the Chicago Bears had from Walter Payton’s lifetime and was able to get these great stories. I kept thinking if Walter Payton were alive, he probably wouldn’t remember the free agent running back from nowhere now, right? But the free agent running back is going to remember his interaction with Walter Payton. It’s the same thing with the Lakers. I talked to so many guys who never even made the team; they just were there as free agents, and they all had memories of things that happened, the interactions, the way guys interacted with each other. To me, it’s like the secret weapon of writing books.

Your portrait of Abdul-Jabbar was hardly flattering. What were your impressions of him?

Pearlman: Enigmatic I think is the best word and kind of tortured. I’ve said this a million times. He and Magic basically had the same basketball career. They were both winners on multiple levels, and superstars and iconic figures. One guy owns the Los Angeles Dodgers, coached the Lakers, held a position in the front office of the Lakers, has been an announcer, had his own talk show, and the other guy can’t get a coaching job in the NBA. To me it comes down to one real thing, which is how you treat people, and Kareem treated people badly all the time. He just was not a nice guy to the fans, to the press. He was very dismissive, very callous. I think it’s a very good lesson, I really do. When you treat people that way repeatedly, it catches up with you and people lose interest.

The other star of the book is the late Lakers owner Jerry Buss. He almost had a James Bond-like aura. The women wanted to be with him and the men want to be like him.

Pearlman: James Bond is a great comparison. He’s just this cool guy, whatever the image of cool is, smoking a cigarette and drinking his brandy in the Forum Club. Two Playboy caliber women by his side, owning the Lakers, filthy rich. People always said, ‘What’s he doing with women half his age?’ But the more I learned about him, he was really compassionate and really decent and really elegant. He had something really suave about him, clearly. I don’t know any guy that doesn’t want a little Jerry Buss in him.

What was the legacy of those Lakers teams?

Pearlman: There’s one thing I keep saying, and I wonder if it sounds weird or not, but I really think Magic ultimately was more important than Bird. (When Johnson was a rookie in 1979), the NBA back then was finals on tape delay, had a reputation of being in quotes, ‘too black.’ Here comes this guy, and he’s engaging and he’s smart and he’s funny and he’s handsome and he’ll hug anyone and he has a huge smile and he’s a brilliant basketball player. He’s like an artist. To me the importance of that, like I would say him and Sugar Ray Leonard were the guys in the early ’80s, black athletes who made their sports accessible to the white sports fan in Kansas who was saying, ‘This league is too black for me.’ I just think Magic’s impact, almost like because of the whole Magic‑Bird, Bird‑Magic thing, it’s a little under-rated how important he was as a figure in the development of the NBA.

As a writer, you’re already thinking of your next book. Do you have one in mind?

Pearlman: Yeah, I’m not allowed to say because I haven’t signed the contract yet. But I’ve already started.

What attracts you to writing books?

Pearlman: My first book came out in 2004 and I’ve written six books. It’s kind of a ridiculous pace. That’s a pretty hard case for writing books. If you want to do this stuff, you have to be prolific. I just love it. I love you sign a book deal, and they leave you alone for two years, and you just report and write. It’s my favorite job I’ve ever had.

Ryan Dempster joins MLB Network in time to celebrate Wrigley’s 100

Good timing.

From MLB Network:

*******

MLB Network today announced that veteran MLB pitcher Ryan Dempster has joined its roster of on-air talent as an analyst. A frequent guest on MLB Tonight and Intentional Talk with Chris Rose and Kevin Millar, Dempster will appear across MLB Network’s studio programming and make his debut tomorrow, April 23 live from Wrigley Field’s 100th anniversary celebration during High Heat with Christopher Russo at 1:00 p.m. ET and Intentional Talk at 5:00 p.m. ET.

MLB Network’s coverage of Wrigley Field’s 100th anniversary on Wednesday will also include the national telecast of the Arizona Diamondbacks at Chicago Cubs game at 2:00 p.m. ET (game subject to local blackouts).

A two-time National League All-Star, Dempster won 132 games and saved 87 games during 16 seasons as a starter and a reliever. He pitched 200 innings or more in seven seasons, including two seasons with over 200 strikeouts. Dempster began his career with the Florida Marlins (1998-2002) and Cincinnati Reds (2002-2003), and after undergoing Tommy John surgery in 2003, Dempster spent nine seasons with the Chicago Cubs (2004-2012) before joining the Texas Rangers (2012). After starting 29 games in 2013 for the Boston Red Sox, Dempster closed out Game One of the World Series against the St. Louis Cardinals, on the way to the Red Sox’s third championship in ten years. In 2000, Dempster received the James “Tip” O’Neill Award from the Canadian Baseball Hall of Fame, and he was the Chicago Cubs’ nominee for the Roberto Clemente Award for community service in 2006 and 2008.

First for NFL in postseason: Significance of ESPN landing a wildcard game

The NFL had been the last major pro sports league to resist placing part of its postseason on cable. Until today.

It was announced this morning that ESPN will air one of the wildcard games during the opening weekend of the playoffs this year. NBC, which had aired both wildcard games, now will get a divisional playoff game.

The ESPN release included this passage:

“The NFL and ESPN reached a new eight-year extension in 2011 for Monday Night Football and broad studio, multimedia and international rights. The agreement – which began this spring and extends through the 2021 NFL season – provides the NFL with an option to air a postseason Wild Card playoff game on ESPN, which the NFL has opted to exercise this season.”

According to John Ourand and Austin Karp of Sports Business Daily, ESPN will pay $100 million season to air the game. Also, in the speculation department, could this move be a prelude to the NFL eventually expanding its postseason to include more games?

ESPN always has been a good partner and seemed worthy of airing a postseason game. Previously, the NFL had wanted to keep its big January games on the traditional broadcast networks.

The migration of big sporting events to cable is accelerating. It only was a matter of time before the NFL joined the party.

One playoff game may not seem like much, but this is yet another sign that when the current NFL TV deal expires after the 2021 season, all bets are off for what could happen regarding how we’ll watch pro football in the next decade.

I’m looking forward to watching the 2023 Super Bowl via the Microsoft chip that gets inserted in my brain.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in NFL