Woman element magnifies ESPN’s move to drop Ward off college football

ESPN shifts announcers all the time, and the moves usually don’t produce headlines. Especially for a play-by-play voice for college football games on ESPNU.

However, news that ESPN dropped Pam Ward off its roster of announcers for college football Monday blazed through the Internet Monday. The story was among the most popular at USA Today’s site and elsewhere.

Why? Why do you think?

Ward is a woman. In fact, she and Beth Mowins were the only two women calling college football games for ESPN last year. When ESPN cuts the field of female play-by-play voices in half, that’s news.

And furthermore, Ward was the first woman play-by-play voice on college football, beginning her run in 2000. Ward even was labeled as “a trailblazer” in a statement by ESPN.

So her reassignment in that regard also is news. According to ESPN, she will  “continue to be a big part of our coverage plans across multiple sports including college basketball, softball, the WNBA and more.”

Just not college football on ESPNU.

ESPN gave her 11 years. It’s not as if Ward was moved out simply because she is a woman.

Yet there will be people who assume that’s the case. Let a woman call the WNBA or college softball. But by golly, don’t let her near a football game.

Ward had her fair share of critics, most notably Awfulannouncing.com. Her face is prominent at the top of AA’s site in its Mt. Rushmore of least favorite announcers, joining Dick Vitale, Tim McCarver and Craig James.

Tuesday, AA’s Matt Yoder did an installment of “The Pam Ward Chronicles,” detailing her mistakes on college football play-by-play dating back to 2007. It’s fairly brutal stuff. It has to be devastating for Ward to be the brunt of such an assault on her work.

I made an attempt to talk to Ward Tuesday, but an ESPN spokesman said she isn’t doing any interviews.

According to an ESPN insider I talked to, Ward “didn’t make more mistakes than (any male) play-by-play announcer.” It happens if you’re on the air long enough.

The insider praised Ward and said: “Voice aside, she wouldn’t be getting the same kind of criticism if she was a man.”

Perhaps, but we’ll never know for sure because Ward is a woman. A woman who made news because she no longer will be doing college football for ESPN.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beadle on over-coverage of her: It’s ridiculous

Hopefully, we’re about to enter a Michelle Beadle-free zone for a while. But first, one last word from the women herself.

Even Beadle was embarrassed about the excessive amount of attention that has been focused on her in recent weeks. In an interview with USA Today, she said:

I find it ridiculous. It’s a little stupid. I’ve changed jobs a couple dozen times since I started in an amusement park at 16. … I got a little sick of myself. It’s been an odd situation. Hopefully, it will come and go and everybody will get back to their business. Very weird. Who knew?

Of her decision to move to NBC, where she will be involved in sports and entertainment programming, she said:

I’m 36 and I knew whatever I signed next would be a threeish-year deal. If I was 25, you’d have time to play with. You know, with high-def TV, women get the short end of the stick.

Anything else? OK, that should be enough Michelle Beadle for a while.

 

Real Sports preview: Lolo Jones explains why she’s still a virgin

Nothing sells more than a 29-year old American virgin running for the gold medal, right?

In an HBO Real Sports interview (Tuesday, 10 p.m.), Lolo Jones tells Mary Carillo why she is saving herself for her future husband.

Speaking of sacrifices, here’s Jones talking about training for the London Olympics.


Yep, that’s what I call good marketing. You’ll be hearing plenty about Lolo Jones in a couple of months.

 

Breaking: Beadle to get show on NBC Sports Network

NBC officially announced the addition of Michelle Beadle to the roster Monday, and it included this surprise: She will have a new show on the NBC Sports Network.

The release says:

As part of the agreement, NBC Sports Group will develop new programming for NBC Sports Network featuring Beadle.

In an interview with 1070 The Fan in Indianapolis, Beadle said:

A new sports show probably around the end of the summer. I’m not leaving sports.

It makes sense for the NBC Sports Network to develop programming for Beadle. People definitely are interested in her as evidenced by the vast speculation about whether she would leave ESPN. You can bet her new show will generate plenty of advance publicity.

NBC showcased her personality with this quote from Beadle in the release:

This gig is the perfect blend of the two things I am most passionate about – sports and pop culture. I look forward to getting back to New York City and immersing myself into a myriad of NBCUniversal platforms, while trying to kick ass and have some fun along the way.

Take that, ESPN.

The release outlines her new gig across NBC’s platforms.

Beadle, who will be based in New York, will serve as a correspondent for the nationally syndicated entertainment news program, “Access Hollywood,” which is anchored by Billy Bush. Beadle will cover all major red carpet events, including movie premieres and fashion week, plus report on all breaking Hollywood news. Beadle will also serve as a correspondent for NBC Sports Group’s big-event properties including this summer’s London Olympic Games, which she will also be covering for “Access Hollywood.” Beadle will also have a role in the 2012 NFL Kickoff and Horse Racing’s Triple Crown, as well as other NBC Sports Network programs. As part of the agreement, NBC Sports Group will develop new programming for NBC Sports Network featuring Beadle.

One thing is for sure: You definitely haven’t heard the last from Michelle Beadle.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Feherty on Donald Trump: Self-effacing pompous windbag

David Feherty is on quite a run.

Last week, he interviewed former president Bill Clinton. This week, his Feherty show features at Donald Trump (Monday, Golf Channel, 10 p.m.).

Here’s Feherty on his impressions of The Donald:

David’s view: The Donald is one of those people you have an opinion one way or another. He’s an extraordinary mixture of pompous windbag and self-effacing…I don’t know how to describe it. He’s not beyond making fun of himself, and then in the next sentence, he’ll tell you how wonderful he is. I wanted to see if there was somewhere in between.

I genuinely like him. Having said that, I can find something to like in everybody I meet. I don’t recall ever bumping into anybody where I thought, “God, what a miserable asshole,” with the definite exception of my first wife.

Hair: The cold opening to the show was about his hair, which he took in good humor.

My hair was very long. All over the place. I think, what the hell am I going to do with this? A comb appears from off-camera. I said, “Man that’s one helluva comb.” We widen out the shot and it’s Don Trump. He’s standing there and he says, “Yes, it is.”

He’s into the whole thing, willing to do whatever we wanted. Obviously, he’s a fan of the game, and a lot of fun to be around.

Golf: His course in Bedminster (Trump National in New Jersey). I thought, my God, this place is magnificent. The way Donald Trump puts things on, they could play a Ryder Cup there. Or a PGA Championship. They’ve played it on worse courses.

His public persona works against him in terms of getting an event like that. I would love to see Trump having an involvement in one of those events. If he’s going to do it, he’s going to do it right. You could see by the quality of what he’s done. And just the way he is.

The experience: The view from the penthouse, my God. The first thing he says is, “We’ve got to dress you.”  I was wearing jeans and a nice shirt, vest, sports coat and tie. Sort of homeless chic. He orders a suit from three floors down. And it comes up and it fits me perfectly.

Punchline: I told him I bought an inflatable Rosie O’Donnell as a gift. But we had been inflating it for two days and it still was a little floppy so he’s going to have to wait.

 

 

 

 

Sherman Q/A with Jim Rome: Doing nothing would be greater risk

If Jim Rome talks smack in the forest, but nobody hears it, does it count as smack?

Rome is well into his second month hosting his new show Rome on CBS Sports Network. Thus far, the latest version of Rome has evolved into a fast-moving show that continues to attract big-time guests: David Stern, Aaron Rogers, Matt Kemp, Justin Verlander, Charles Barkley among others.

“It’s early on, but I am as proud of this show as any show I’ve ever done,” said Rome in his distinctive tone during a phone interview with me.

Yet having said that, Rome is well aware of the reality of his new situation. CBS Sports Network doesn’t have any ratings data for Rome’s new show, but you don’t have to be a Nielsen expert to know it is a fraction of what it was at his former home on ESPN.

I tell Rome my boys, ages 16 and 14, used to watch his show all the time. They came home from school, turned on ESPN and took in the late afternoon block of programming. So much for homework.

They haven’t altered their routine to accommodate Rome’s switch. Television viewing is habitual, I tell Rome, and at 5 p.m. (Central), they are watching SportsCenter instead of flipping to CBS Sports Network for Rome’s show.

“I get it,” Rome said. “I need a buy-in from those kids.”

Then Rome said, “If you want, I’ll tell them myself.”

Unfortunately, the boys weren’t home on this day, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they eventually get a call from Rome. He is so passionate about his new endeavor, he would go door-to-door to attract viewers.

Rome actually is counting on the conventional methods (word-of-mouth and promotion) to build an audience. He knows it will take time and that he may be playing to a mostly empty room for a while.

Rome, though, remains confident he made the right decision, and he continues to stress there is more involved to this move than just the CBS Sports Network show.

Here’s my Q/A with Rome.

What’s your assessment of the show thus far?

I was ready for a new challenge, ready for a new show. We’re hitting it hard. It’s early on, but I am as proud of this show as any show I’ve ever done.

We’re putting so much more into it. I always liked the last show that I did, but it became kind of static. Four burns off the top of the show. Then you’d get an interview. Then you’d get a panelist. Then you’d get one burn at the back end of the show.

This is much more labor intensive. We’re trying to get 7-8 burns at the top. Then we’ll do an interview. If there’s not a good interview, then we’ll double up on the panel. A lot more content. It feels like it moves faster. It feels like the 2.0 version of what I was doing.

Could you have done the same thing for ESPN? Could you have said I want to change the format of the show?

It’s a real interesting question. We just thought we were doing as much as we could do. Everyone was happy with the show. It never came up. At one point they came to me and said, instead of having two people on your panel,. go ahead and have one person. We always thought we were giving as much as we possibly could. It wasn’t until I left where we all said, ‘Look, you can’t do the same show you’ve always done. You’ve got to do more and be better.’

For the millionth time, what were your motivations for the move?

I felt like I had done same show for so long. At this point in my career, I said I could keep doing the same thing. I thought there is risk inherent in not trying to stretch and try something new. On top of that, let’s be honest. If it was just a straight swap, simply moving show to CBS Sports Network,  maybe that’s something I wouldn’t have done. They’ve offered me so many other things. They put me on Letterman. I was on the set of the Final Four; I was on the pregame show for the AFC Championship game, and there are more opportunities, including a show on Showtime. When CBS calls and offers you that, you don’t say no.

Do you consider yourself a person who likes to take risks?

Am I a risk guy?  Doing nothing would have been a greater risk. But I’m pretty calculating. Sometimes, you have to push yourself.

I’m trying to get in and hopefully make a difference. It’s a big swing. Guys like us who have done this a long time, you’ve got to take a shot.

You mention a Showtime program. What will that be?

It’s going to come out in the Fall. I’m not trying to hide anything, but there’s really not anything new at this point.

What was it like to see all the billboards and ads promoting the new show?

They had this unbelievable roll out when they made the announcement. In my entire career, I never had that kind of promotion in radio or TV. That in of itself was an incredible thing for my career, for my brand.

When I got to New York to do Letterman, I saw a billboard of myself. Somebody took a picture of me standing next to it. I emailed it to my wife. She literally cried. She couldn’t believe it. It was an amazing feeling, and a surreal feeling. It made me want to do well for these folks because they put it out there for me.

You’ve had great guests thus far.

Maybe, it’s the relationships I have with these guys that they want to come on with Rome, whatever that show might be. They’ll get a fair interview and hopefully a smart interview. But it feels good.

How do you reach the viewers who turn on ESPN and leave it on?

You’re exactly right. It’s the De facto channel. You don’t have to find anything. You just turn your TV on. My feeling is, I only can do what I can do. I’m constantly trying to say this is where we are, this is what we’re doing. I try and use Twitter and my radio show to get the word out.

Look, they’ve got a 40-year head start on us and everyone else. ESPN is ESPN. It’s a monster. I understand it isn’t going to change overnight. I’m determined to keep grinding it out every day and do everything I can to get your kids to tune into that network.

There aren’t any ratings for your show. How do you know if people are watching?

I hear from the radio listeners. I get the feedback through Twitter and the radio show. That’s how I know people are seeing the show. We have to tell people where to find it. That’s the challenge. Exactly where are you and when are you on? That’s the challenge thus far.

Do people still say to you, ‘You’re crazy, why did you leave ESPN?

Yeah, little bit. Once in a while. It’s not just the one show. It’s the whole platform. It’s been great. They were very good to me at ESPN. I had a great run there. CBS has been awesome. It’s a great company to work for. They give me a lot of support. I’ve never once looked back.

It’s a big picture thing. I’m not so locked in that it’s just the TV show. I’m reaching so many different places across the platforms. Once I made the decision, once I’m in, I’m all in. It might sound trite, but I’m trying to do the best TV show I can do every single day. That’s what I’m focused on. It’s going to take some time. As long as I can do a TV show I’m proud of, that’s the only thing that matters.

So no buyer’s remorse?

I’m not like that. I thought about this for a long, long time. Once I decided to do it, I was all in. No buyer’s remorse at all.

I know what I signed up for. I understand where I am right now. I know I’m supposed to help drive the eyeballs to this network.

 

 

 

 

Stephen A enjoys Jay Pharoah’s impression on SNL

You know you’ve reached a new level of celebrity when Saturday Night Live starts to goof on you. SNL locked in on ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith Saturday.

Stephen A. had a favorable impression of Jay P’s impression. On his Twitter feed, he said:

Saturday Night Live spoofed me last night. And I got to admit: it was damn HILARIOUS! Loved it! Hysterical!!!

Then on SportsCenter, he said:

“It was hysterical…but I would never wear that shirt w/that tie.”

And one more from this morning:

“Loved it! It was Hilarious. Comical. Especially the looks/facial expressions. I’m still laughing!”

The skit didn’t appear on the actual show. It ran as a bonus on SNL’s site.

I think the bit killed. I wouldn’t be surprised if Pharoah’s Stephen A becomes a regular character on Weekend Update.

Next, I’m looking forward to SNL’s take on Skip Bayless.

 

Sunday bookshelf: Fantography features vintage baseball photos shot by fans

About once or twice a year, I’ll reach into my collection and pull out the “When It Was a Game” video. It is the classic HBO documentary (narrated by my old friend Peter Kessler) featuring home movies of baseball’s beautiful past. You can see so much detail in these vintage old films, shot in color no less. It brings a distant era of the game back to life.

Now there’s a book version of the documentary: Baseball Fantography: A Celebration in Snapshots and Stories from the Fans. Written by Andy Strasberg, the book features vintage photos of players and other baseball images shot by regular baseball fans.

There are pictures of an intense Roberto Clemente; Babe Ruth leaving a baseball with his daughter; a young Howard Cosell during batting practice at Yankee Stadium; and even Hall of Famer Eddie Matthews toweling off in a shower. That one was submitted by Mrs. Matthews.

Strasberg, a former executive with the San Diego Padres, grew up in New York idolizing Roger Maris. He contributes a photo (above) of with him of his hero in 1966. He has his arm around Maris as if they were best friends.

Indeed, later in life Strasberg did become friends with Maris. He remains so close to the late slugger’s family that he is the Godfather to one of his grandchildren.

If you love baseball history, I highly recommend this book. Here’s a Q/A I did with Strasberg.

What makes these fan pictures so special compared to those taken by professional photographers?

Professional photographers are paid to “focus” on what happens on the field during the game, and I felt that they were missing a big part of the baseball experience for fans.

These are personal and poignant photos from, by and for the fans.  It is the photographic memory of what was/is important to the fan as seen through the lens of their camera.

How did you get the pictures?

I first got the word out through family and friends and then through the media (electronic and print) around the country.  I explained that I was not looking for photos NOT taken by professionals and none of game action.

I received pictures from decades ago and the variety of captured moments amazed me!

Were you really best friends with Roger Maris and what did that picture mean to you?

I was Roger Maris’ number one fan growing up in the 1960s.  Once I started working in baseball (1975) for the Padres marketing department, our player/fan relationship matured into a friendship which fortunately for me continues to this day with his family.

The photos I have of Maris and me are incredibly important. In each one you can tell how excited I am to be with him.  But perhaps the most insightful photo is the one of me when I was 12 and I went into a photo booth (4 photos for 25₵) with a magazine that had a picture of Maris swinging a bat to see what I’d look like if I was ever lucky enough to have my photo taken with him.

Besides the Maris picture, what are your other favorite pictures in the book?

In no order some of my favorite photos are: the Roberto Clemente photo, Dizzy Dean having a catch on Doubleday Field, The Duke Snider Lanes sign, the Albert Schoensleben grave site, Lombardi fishing, Babe Ruth leaving Yankee Stadium, Eddie Mathews stepping out of a shower, Max West with his foot on the car bumper and the fan holding the batting average sign of Gwynn and Clark to name just a few.

Did you get enough pictures to do another book?

Yes, and I get more photos every day.  There are treasured keepsake photos out there that I can’t wait to see.  They may be from the 1930’s, 70’s or a photo taken this August.

I am hoping that the fans respond to the Baseball Fantography book in a positive way so that I can publish additional books with never been seen unpublished and significant photos for the next 20 years!

Anything else?

No one has been able to shine the light on the fans consistently and provide them a forum to express what about baseball is important.  Baseball Fantography does that in both text and photos

For the last few years I have had over 20 Baseball Fantography exhibits around the country – Cooperstown, Pasadena, San Diego, Tucson, and currently at the Yogi Berra Museum in New Jersey.

I would like to find an appropriate venue in the Midwest to host a Baseball Fantography display.

The dedicated web site of Baseball Fantography is http://www.fantography.com/

 

 

 

Rodman pays price for decadent lifestyle: ESPN OTL interview

Do you feel sorry for Dennis Rodman? Mark Schwarz interviewed him for Outside the Lines Sunday at 9 a.m.

Rodman breaks down in this clip talking about his 24-year old daughter, who he’s seen only five times in his life.

Here’s the preview from ESPN

In March, headlines described former NBA star Dennis Rodman as “broke” and “extremely sick.” At 51, and now a dozen years removed from his last NBA rebound, he often boasts he hasn’t had a steady job since being waived by the Dallas Mavericks in 2000. For Rodman, who has had issues with alcohol, life has never come as easily as professional basketball. Sunday, the flamboyant Hall of Famer speaks candidly about life after basketball, and about allegations that he’s an alcoholic. Mark Schwarz reports.

Sunday’s guests will include Kurt Rambis, who coached Rodman on the Lakers in 1999, and Tim Keown who co-wrote “Bad As I Wanna Be,” the 1997 best-selling autobiography.

“I been hearing that for years — I’ve been hearing that   I’m a cokehead, I’m a drug head.  Everyone knows that I like to have a good time. If you see me drinking, ok great. I drink! If you see me having sex every day, oh, I’m an addict. I’ve looked death in the eyes. And I say one day I could probably drink to a point where it’s like I won’t wake up.” — Dennis Rodman

“I started to go out to dinner for free. I started to get cars and stuff like that for free. I started to get a lot of things around the country. All of a sudden I land the big one, Madonna, so it’s like, ‘Hello!!’ I started to get stuff like that.” — Dennis Rodman