ESPN’s Darren Rovell posted this compilation photo on his Twitter feed. Seems to say it all.
Say what you want about LeBron James, people tune in to watch him to do his thing the same way they did for Michael Jordan.
Jordan’s numbers during the Finals actually are higher, but that is due in part to the TV landscape being much different in the 90s. Fewer choices back then. Also, Michael was Michael.
But you can be sure ABC and NBA is very happy to have LeBron playing 7-game series in 2013. The guy puts on quite a show.
Also in the comparison department, James at 28 now has the same amount of NBA titles Jordan had at 28. He has a long way to go before his final legacy is written.
Here are the overnight ratings from last night:
********
NBA Finals Game 7 on ABC – the Miami Heat defeated the San Antonio Spurs in a thriller to repeat as NBA Champions – delivered a 17.7 overnight rating, according to Nielsen. This is the second highest-rated NBA game in ABC history. The telecast peaked at a 22.6 from 11:30 p.m. – 11:45 p.m. ET.
Game 7 is also expected to mark the 37th consecutive time an NBA Finals telecast has won the night for all of television and is the 25th straight time it has delivered double-digit overnight ratings.
The game generated a 44.2 metered market rating in Miami, making it the highest-rated NBA game ever in the market. Additionally, Game 7 scored big in San Antonio with a 46.4.
The 2013 NBA Finals averaged a 12.4 metered market rating, up five percent from an 11.8 for the 2012 NBA Finals.
In addition, the Kia NBA Countdown pre-game show scored a strong 5.4 overnight rating.
The question needs to be asked: Should the entire Stanley Cup Final air on NBC?
The difference was striking between Games 3 and 4. On Monday, Game 3 pulled in 4.04 million viewers on NBC Sports Network. The network is in 80 million homes.
Wednesday, NBC, which is in 115 million homes, took over for Game 4. Number of viewers: 6.49 million.
That’s a 61 percent increase. Why?
Quality of games: Boston dominated Game 3, winning 2-0. Meanwhile, Game 4 was a wild affair, with the Blackhawks finally taking a 6-5 victory in overtime. The rating peaked at 8.192 million viewers during the extra session, a huge number for hockey.
So some of the increase obviously has to be attributed to the quality of games. However, Game 2 also went to overtime. The game attracted 3.94 million viewers on NBC Sports Network.
OK, it can be argued that ratings build as you get deeper into a series. Well then, what about Game 1, which pulled in 6.4 million viewers for the triple overtime? The network: NBC.
Clearly, the fact that NBC is in 35 million more homes than NBC Sports Network means that many more people will have access to the biggest hockey games of the season. And that includes the casual viewer who doesn’t have much interest in hockey but might just tune in while channel surfing. Who knows? That person might have been intrigued by the terrific end to Game 4 and decide to watch Game 5.
That’s how hockey fans are born.
As I wrote Wednesday, airing Stanley Cup Final games on NBC Sports Network is a way to drive viewers to that network.
NBC Sports Network wants to grow its subscriber base from 80 million homes to nearly 100 million homes, or comparable to the distribution for ESPN. It wants potential viewers to call their cable operators and demand that the network either be added to their systems or put on a basic tier.
NBC knows it takes missing out on Stanley Cup Final games for people to make that call.
The NHL also has a vested interest in growing NBC Sports Network. The network is the main home for hockey, airing more than 100 regular season and playoff games. More subscribers means more potential hockey viewers.
But can the NHL afford to be missing out on a potential 1.5-2.5 million viewers and possibly future fans by airing Final games on NBC Sports Network?
It is a question that should be asked within Gary Bettman’s office and then addressed with NBC.
Neil Hayes is living the dream of nearly every author. His book is being made into a movie.
In 2002, Hayes wrote, When the Game Stands Tall: The Story of the De La Salle Spartans and Football’s Longest Winning Streak. The high school in Concord, Calif. had an epic 151-game winning streak that stretched over 13 years.
It took almost as long for the book to be made into a movie. But after many twists, turns, and seemingly roadblocks, the film actually just completed shooting in New Orleans. The cast includes Jim Caviezel as coach Bob Ladouceur, Laura Dern as his wife, and Michael Chiklis as De La Salle’s defensive coordinator.
Thomas Carter (Coach Carter) is the director, and Scott Marshall Smith adapted the screenplay from Hayes’ book. The film is slated for release in fall, 2014.
Hayes left his job at the Chicago Sun-Times so he could be a consultant during the filming of the movie. Here’s my Q/A with him about the entire experience.
You wrote this book in 2002. Did you ever dream it would be a movie?
I never dreamed this big. I just wanted to write something that fully explained the most unique football program and coach I have ever encountered. Big publishers wouldn’t touch it. They said it was too regional of a subject so I went with a local publisher. I was convinced this story would resonate. It’s very gratifying to know my instincts were correct.
As far as the movie goes, it has taken 10 years and two different producers to get to this point. I never allowed myself to believe it would happen until it actually did.
How much input did you have on the script?
Although I didn’t write the script, I was included from the very beginning and felt my voice was heard and that I impacted the script throughout the process.
What has it been like to be in New Orleans to watch the film get made? What have you learned about making a movie?
Surreal. That’s the only way to describe watching actors such as Jim Caviezel, Laura Dern and Michael Chiklis play characters I know so well.
As far as the actual making of the movie, it’s as grueling as it is rewarding. We are working a minimum of 12 hours a day while switching back and forth from day shoots to all-nighters. You film all these short scenes, from three or four different angles, and not even in chronological order. Then it all gets pieced together in post-production. It’s an amazing creative process to watch unfold.
How much interaction have you had with the actors?
Tons. I spent a lot of time with Jim early in the process to help him understand his character. Chiklis is from Boston and is a huge Bruins fan, which has made the Stanley Cup Finals interesting. Laura’s one of the most approachable people you could meet and is a bright light whenever she walks on set. The young actors playing football players are terrific guys and terrific actors who have been a blast to be around.
Why did you decide to leave the Sun-Times?
Being on set during the making of a movie based on my book is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity I couldn’t pass up.
Short version: What made the DeLaSalle story so special? Why has this story resonated through the years?
Here’s the quote from Bob Ladouceur that convinced me this story had to be told.
“Kids respect true humility and that you stand for something more than winning. They’ll fight for you and your program if you stand for more than that. It boils down to what you believe in as a person, and I’m talking about how life should be lived and how people should be treated. Kids see all that. It’s a whole package of things that has nothing to do with standing in front of a team with a piece of chalk. You can know who to block and what play to call, but it has no meaning unless the kids know who you are. Our kids aren’t fighting for wins. They’re fighting for a belief in what we stand for.”
A little something to get you in the mood for tonight’s Game 7.
On June 20, 1993, John Paxson, not Michael Jordan, hit the clutch three-pointer during Game 6 of the Bulls-Phoenix final.
Couple interesting points. The Suns opened the door for the Bulls, missing 6 of 7shots down the stretch.
The Bulls, though, also were shaky. Prior to that final possession, they only had 9 points in the fourth quarter, all scored by Jordan.
Here’s the shot we’ll never forget in Chicago.
Phil Mushnick in the New York Post wrote a nice tribute to Dave Jennings, the former New York Giants punter, who went on to become a radio analyst for the Jets and Giants. Jennings, 61, died Wednesday due to Parkinson’s Disease.
Mushnick writes:
Jennings was beyond remarkable; he was extraordinary, as brave and as stoical as any innocent condemned to the gallows. And Jennings suffered — quietly, increasingly — from Parkinson’s for nearly 20 years.
“He never complained, not a word,” said ESPN broadcaster Bob Picozzi, tight with Jennings since 1977, when Jennings, the Giants’ fourth-year punter, began to seriously pursue a sportscasting career, co-hosting Picozzi’s Connecticut radio show.
“He just didn’t like talking about it. It was his problem, and no one else’s. He’d just say he’s doing fine, then politely change the subject. He’d make it easy on you.”
Mushnick thought Jennings should have been on the network stage:
Jennings was the most prepared NFL analyst I ever heard on TV or radio. He not only dutifully attended practices to find out what was up with the Jets (1988-2001) and then the Giants (2002-08), he went deep — he knew the NFL rulebook far better, I’m sure, than any radio or TV analyst — not that many bothered or today bother to learn then apply the rules to the games they work.
Jennings was my go-to guy for any and all rules. We’d talk rules for hours, especially those that made little sense or were most butchered by big-ticket network experts. He was so far ahead of the rest that it seemed insane that no national NFL TV network would hire him to work its games.
“It’s not my call,” said Jennings, who never — not even once — campaigned for a national TV gig through this column. On and off the air, he was a straight-talker, not a self-promoter.
Of course, no matter how well he might have served a network’s TV audiences, Jennings was a former punter, not a former quarterback. Quarterbacks get the girls, the endorsements and the TV gigs. Whether they’ll be any good at it doesn’t much matter because there’s no shortage of freshly retired QBs.
Indeed, it has been a treat to listen to a pair of Mikes, Emrick and Breen, calling the respective finals in their leagues. And it is fitting that the NBA series is going a full seven tonight, and that Stanley Cup Final likely will follow suit.
Both play-by-play men deserve to go the distance.
As I’ve said before, Mike “Doc” Emrick has become the Vin Scully of hockey. He paints pictures with his own unique descriptions even though we’re watching the game on TV. More importantly, Emrick knows how to elevate the drama when everyone’s heart is beating a bit faster during crucial moments.
During the wild third period last night, Emrick summed it up for the viewers: “This is marvelous… It’s all a matter of getting your name on the Stanley Cup and getting a ring that’s so large to wear.”
Meanwhile, Breen’s style is to fit in seamlessly with the game he is calling. He complements the telecast, knowing exactly how to set up his quirky partner, Jeff Van Gundy. Yet when the big moment comes, as it did several times during Game 6, Breen rises to the occasion and delivers.
So a tip of the cap to Emrick and Breen. Thanks for making June so much fun.
********
To hear both men discuss their approaches and profession, check out Matt Yoder’s interviews with them for the Awful Announcing podcast series.
Here is the link for Emrick.
Here is the link for Breen.