Johnny Miller ticked off about Open moving to Fox; Will shift lead to him retiring?

Typically, Johnny Miller didn’t hold back when he learned NBC lost the U.S. Open to Fox Sports, beginning in 2015.

Miller told Doug Ferguson of the Associated Press:

”It was a big bummer,” Miller told The Associated Press from his home in Utah. ”For some reason, I told Dan Hicks at the U.S. Open this year, ‘I don’t think we’re going to keep the U.S. Open.’ I just had a hunch it would be ESPN or Fox that stepped in and made a high bid. I know we tried.

”I feel bad for the USGA in a way that money was more important than basically a good golf crew.”

Later Miller added:

”I don’t know what they’re going to do,” Miller said about Fox. ”You can’t just fall out of a tree and do the U.S. Open. I guess the money was more important than the performance. No way they can step in and do the job we were doing. It’s impossible. There’s just no way. I wish Fox the very best.”

Miller could go a long way in helping the telecasts by jumping to Fox. His contract with NBC runs through 2015.

If Miller is interested, NBC would have to let him out of his contract a year early so he could do the 2015 U.S. Open for Fox. It is possible given all that Miller has meant to NBC’s golf coverage.

Miller told Ferguson that it is unlikely he would go to Fox if given the chance. However, he could change his mind. Miller’s famous 63 at Oakmont has him forever linked with the U.S. Open. The chance to do more Opens would be enticing.

Miller, though, is 66 and has talked of cutting back in recent years. He also is fiercely loyal to the NBC golf crew, headed by producer Tommy Roy. He likely wouldn’t be thrilled about learning to work with a new team at Fox at the age of 68.

Don’t be surprised if Miller works NBC’s final U.S. Open at Pinehurst in 2014 and then walks off into the sunset.

 

 

 

Posted in NBC

NBC wins Nancy battle over ESPN: Kerrigan will talk only to NBC for documentary

Last week, ESPN announced its lineup for a new slate of 30 for 30 movies in the fall. They included Tonya and Nancy, a look back at what happened 20 years ago. The release said:

Now two decades later, Tonya and Nancy takes a fresh look through revealing new interviews with the Harding and Kerrigan camps at a unique worldwide spectacle.

Well, one of those interviews won’t be with Nancy Kerrigan.

NBC has won the Nancy battle. Saturday, the network announced that Kerrigan will speak exclusively to Mary Carillo for an NBC documentary on the sorted affair.

Here’s a possible reason for the exclusive. Richard Deitsch at SI.com reports Kerrigan could be part of NBC’s Olympic coverage from Sochi.

Deitsch writes:

An NBC Sports spokesperson told SI.com on Saturday that Kerrigan is not being paid for her interview with Carillo. But when asked if Kerrigan was being considered for an on-air gig for the Sochi Games, the spokesperson said, “Nancy is among many former Winter Olympic athletes under consideration for an on-air role in Sochi.”

As for ESPN, the network says it is proceeding with its documentary with or without an interview from Kerrigan.

 

 

 

What’s another billion dollars? NBC spends big money to land NASCAR; analysis of new deal

At some point, you would think the cartoonish spending for sports on TV will end. The money has to run out eventually, right?

Well, that wasn’t the case Tuesday. According to Sports Business Daily, NBC shelled out $4.4 billion for a new 10-year contract to air NASCAR on NBC and NBC Sports Network, beginning in 2015.

From Tripp Mickle and John Ourand:

That represents a significant media rights increase for NASCAR over the more than $2.28B paid by ESPN and Turner Sports combined for the same number of Sprint Cup and Nationwide races in their current 8-year agreements. This comes after NASCAR received a more than 30% increase in its earlier deal with Fox that covers the first half of its season.

Why was NBC so motivated? Of the 20 races in this package, 13 will be shown on NBC Sports Network. That’s prime live programming for a sports network that saw itself get left on the sidelines for MLB and some of the major college rights deals. Now NASCAR gives NBC SN a valuable property in the summer and fall.

NBC Sports chairman Mark Lazarus called the deal “a game changer.” Whether it leaves NBC without any change in its pocket remains to be seen, but Tuesday wasn’t a day for crunching numbers.

“Over the past two and a half years, we have set forth, since Comcast bought NBC, to renew and acquire properties,” Lazarus said. “We’ve done a significant amount of deals in that time period, but this is one that we’ve really been focused on. The fact that we are going to be working with all of those NASCAR constituencies to build content for NBC, NBC Sports Network, our regional sports networks, the quantity of content that this deal provides and the quality of content that this provides is really a game changer for us for our entire group, and we can’t wait to get started.”

As for NASCAR, why leave ESPN, which is seen in 20 million more homes than NBC SN? Well, it is following the NHL’s lead here.

At ESPN, NASCAR often trailed in the fumes from the network’s coverage of football, college and pro, the NBA, and MLB. At NBC and NBC SN, NASCAR will be the main game in town during its coverage season. The scenario has worked out well for the NHL.

Indeed, when you think about it, how weird was it to hear NASCAR president Brian France invoke hockey when discussing the new deal?

France said: “I can tell you from our discussions as we negotiated this, the integration, and I know that word is used a lot and over used probably sometimes, but the reality is that you can see what they’ve done with the NHL and other properties. They’re in a mode where they’re pulling together all their properties.  They still have a bigger emphasis on big events on network television.”

Lazarus added: “What I think we’ve demonstrated over the past several years is that when we’re able to have a property like the Olympics, the NHL,  the Premier League,  NASCAR, Formula 1, we’re able to bring an audience and surround it with content. (We do it) both on broadcast, on cable, in digital by promoting and marketing using our RSNs. We’re able to bring a level of awareness to a sport, to a property that is frankly unparalleled in the industry, and that’s what we intend to do with NASCAR.”

Starting in 2015, there will be 10 years to see if this deal works for both parties. And for NASCAR fans.

*******

For those who want more, here is the entire transcript to the call:

BRIAN FRANCE:  Good afternoon, everyone.  Obviously a very exciting and huge day for the sport of NASCAR, the industry of NASCAR and all of our stakeholders, and before I talk just a moment for how excited we are about the future, and I certainly want to make mention of two partners who are not going to be renewing their rights, that being TNT and Turner and ESPN.  We’ve been together one way or the other for 30 plus years, and they’ve done an outstanding job of presenting the NASCAR story week in and week out, and we’ll certainly miss them in many ways.

But this isn’t about the present, it’s about the future, and the future for us, with all of the assets of NBC and Universal and Comcast, made a very compelling point to us that we’re better together going forward with their family of networks and assets, and not to mention the fact that we’ve had a long standing and long confidence in Mark Lazarus, who spearheaded the deal on their part.  So we had a high degree of confidence that Mark brought to the table, and we’ve outlined what we think is just a terrific agreement, one that’s going to present the sport    we think it’s going to be very, very compelling on how that’s going to get done, and there’s a lot of work to be done on the NBC side, and they’re excited about just that.

But what we know is the integration of the assets that they are marshaling together, because this is going to be such an important franchise sport for them, made it to be so compelling that it was just the right choice.  So I know I speak for everybody at NASCAR, including our stakeholders, our drivers, teams, tracks and sponsors, and I’ve talked to an awful lot of them here in the last 24 hours, and there’s a real excitement about partnering with NBC and what I’ve told them, and we’re thrilled to be part of the NBC Sports family.

With that I will turn it back over to you, Greg.

GREG HUGHES:  Thank you, Brian.  Now the chairman of the NBC Sports Group, Mark Lazarus.

MARK LAZARUS:  Thanks.  I’ll simply start by saying we are back.  We are thrilled to be back.  When NBC was involved with NASCAR from 2001 to 2006, it was a very good experience for NBC, the rich history of NASCAR.  We think that the stakeholders at NASCAR, led by Brian as well as the teams, the owners, the tracks, the drivers, will all welcome us back with open arms based on previous history and experience with us, and we couldn’t be happier to have NASCAR back as a tent pole property for NBC and NBC Sports Network, as well as integrating, as Brian said, other assets into the deal.

Over the past two and a half years, we have set forth, since Comcast bought NBC, to renew and acquire properties.  We’ve done a significant amount of deals in that time period, but this is one that we’ve really been focused on, one that we have wanted to have the opportunity to be able to sit at the table when contractual opportunities came due, and the fact that we are going to be working with all of those NASCAR constituencies to build content for NBC, NBC Sports Network, our regional sports networks, the quantity of content that this deal provides and the quality of content that this provides is really a game changer for us for our entire group, and we can’t wait to get started.

GREG HUGHES:  Now let’s go to Steve Herbst, NASCAR vice president of broadcasting and production.

STEVE HERBST:  Thanks.  I just wanted to echo what Brian said earlier, just that NBC brings so much to the table for NASCAR, outstanding production quality, great promotional opportunities with all their other properties.  Some of the best championship programming you’ll see out there lives on NBC, and I think it’s the start of something really special, a very special partnership.

With today’s announcement and the FOX agreement we came to in the fall, our TV picture, our puzzle is almost complete.  We have one more package out there.  It’s a first half Nationwide package with 14 Nationwide races, along with three Cup races.  That package is being discussed.  We have ongoing negotiations, and we plan to place that very soon, and that will all move very quickly.

Finally from me I just want to say for ESPN and Turner, they are our partners through 2014.  High class organizations with great leadership with John Skipper and David Levy and others.  We’ll work closely with them through the balance of this season and next season to deliver great product to the fans.

Q.  Steve and Brian, can you give me a sense, you don’t always see a property leaving ESPN.  What is it about the NBC Universal Comcast asset that you find at least or more compelling than ESPN’s assets, which are always talked about, their many, many, many platforms?

BRIAN FRANCE:  Well, I’ll take that.  First of all, I think it’s the commitment that they’ve made in terms of how important NASCAR is going to be within the already robust properties that they have, and start with that.  And I can tell you from our discussions as we negotiated this, the integration, and I know that word is used a lot and over used probably sometimes, but the reality is that you can see what they’ve done with the NHL and other properties; they’re in a mode where they’re pulling together all their properties, and non sports properties, as well, and plus the network.  They still have a bigger emphasis on big events on network television.

So a combination of all of that, and then the trust that we have in Mark, because we’ve done business with him for many, many years, it brought it to a point where this is the right place for us to be.

Q.  My question is for Brian, following up on that.  The last time ESPN didn’t have a deal with you guys from 2001 to 2006, it seemed to affect their coverage of the races.  I know you guys weren’t as big a presence on SportsCenter.  They’re such a Goliath on the sporting landscape.  Are you worried about how you might be affected in terms of being presented on ESPN?

BRIAN FRANCE:  You know, we’re actually not, and the reason is it’s a different time now.  They have different thinking about how they want to cover sports.  John Skipper is as good as it gets in his organization, and we’ve had conversations.  Obviously you think about all those things, but the reality is they have to cover the big events that people watch every weekend, and I don’t    you never can predict the future, but we didn’t think that was something that would hold us back from making this deal, that’s for sure.

Q.  So they’ll still be invited or credentialed for races if they choose to do that in 2015 and beyond?

BRIAN FRANCE:  Well, yes, but obviously there are exclusive rights and some things we’ll have to all work through, but that’s not anything different than what naturally occurs.  So we’ll be working through that.  I have no problem that this is a different time than way back when, and I’m certain that we’ll all figure that out together.

Q.  Brian, can you talk about the balance between having races on network versus races on cable, specifically NBC Sports Network?  I don’t know if you can give us any final figure of how many races per season will be on network total and cable with the combined deals.

STEVE HERBST:  Are you asking about the NBC package or the overall package?

Q.  I know the NBC package.  I was curious if you could give us any sort of figure for the entire package, at least for 33 of the 36.

STEVE HERBST:  So the first half package obviously with FOX, we’re still discussing the mix there, so I don’t have an overall number for you.  You see the split for the second half Cup on NBC of 13 and 7, but we are not ready to talk about    13 and 7 for NBC.  But we’ll have information in due time on what the total season will look like.

MARK LAZARUS:  Let me just talk a little bit about having a balance and having both the broadcast and NBC Sports Network.  What we have found and what we have learned and what I think we’ve demonstrated over the past several years is that when we’re able to have a property, whether it’s a part of a season or an entire season or complete ownership of a property like the Olympics, like the national hockey league, like premier league, like NASCAR, like Formula 1, and we’re able to bring an audience and surround it with content, both on broadcast, on cable, in digital by promoting and marketing using our RSNs, that we’re able to bring a level of awareness to a sport, to a property that is frankly unparalleled    equal to or unparalleled in the industry, and that’s what we intend to do with NASCAR.  By having this mix, what we always do is make big events bigger, and that’s what we’ll do each Saturday and Sunday from July on starting in 2015.

Q.  Let me ask Brian, do you consider it a risk at all to go from what I would say is the more    obviously an older, more established cable network to one that’s kind of still in its infancy?

BRIAN FRANCE:  No, because if you look at what they’re doing right now, and Mark just outlined it, he’s not just talking conceptually.  They’re doing that right now with record ratings with the NHL and the integration of the Olympics, Sunday Night Football.  I mean, don’t forget, they have a robust lineup obviously without us, and we’re going to add to that in a significant way.

I can assure you from hearing from leadership throughout the Comcast system, they didn’t just want to own sports properties, they wanted to integrate within all their assets, and they’re doing it right now.  We don’t have to guess about it.  We’re looking forward to it.

Q.  I just wonder if you could talk about, it’s probably too early for this since it’s a couple years ago, but will you be bringing over some of the TNT or ESPN or NASCAR on air talent to NBC or NBC Sports, and also, how does this affect the future of the IndyCar Series on NBC and NBC Sports?

MARK LAZARUS:  Well, two questions there.  Let me start with the talent question:  First of all, all those folks are under contract to TNT and ESPN, and we’re respectful of those contracts.  It is too early.  Frankly this deal began and ended in very short order and expeditiously, so our production team is learning about it in sort of real time here, so they haven’t even spent any energy thinking about talent, though my guess is their heads are spinning and they’re thinking very hard now.  We have a couple of years on that.

But what I do promise is that when we hire talent, we do it with the thought of being relevant to the core fan but also being welcoming and open to the casual or new fan, and I think when you look around our Mount Rushmore of broadcasters, whether it’s Al Michaels, Cris Collinsworth, Johnny Miller, Bob Costas and others that I’m sure that I know I’m leaving off, Dan Patrick, that we are second to none both in play by play and analysts, and we will continue that with NASCAR as we move towards the beginning of our contract.

How does it relate to IndyCar?  We think that this gives us    listen, we have IndyCar rights for NBC Sports Network.  We do not own the rights for broadcast.  Those are held by ABC and ESPN, by ABC, so we are only the cable partner there, so we are not able to do what we do with other sports by wrapping around it fully.

This will have no impact there, other than that I believe with us now being the home to the second half of the NASCAR season, the home for cable for Indy and the home to Formula 1, that we are one of the    probably the most dominant home for motorsports, and that that circulation of motorsports fans will be good for all.

Q.  Mark, I have a follow up on what you just said, which is that you’re the dominant home for motorsports.  With three racing series that are worldwide, was it NBC Sports group’s design to sort of grab the motorsports market, or is that just sort of how the properties fell?

MARK LAZARUS:  Well, you know, a design would be probably too forward thinking.  As we saw the way rights were developing over the last 24 months, we saw an opportunity, and as SPEED Channel decided to make its migration to something more multisport, we saw an opportunity to potentially fill a gap in the marketplace that might not be satisfied, and so we set forth, not knowing whether NASCAR would ever be able to us, but we set forth with the others.  We inherited the IndyCar deal.  We were able to acquire the F1 deal and that gave us the base.

But then seeing the opportunity that might exist with NASCAR, we believed that we can fill a gap in the marketplace for fans, for marketers and potentially with our cable operators and affiliates.

No one else has ever had all three of those.

Q.  Steve, I have a question for you, and I may be incorrect, but it’s my understanding NBC Sports Network is blocked in Canada, and one thing we see is a lot of complaints from Canadian fans about their ability to access NASCAR coverage, so how will you address that?

STEVE HERBST:  We have a TSN relationship that will continue, and we have broadcast TV, so our broadcast TV will reach Canada.  We have the ongoing TSN relationship, and that’s how we’ll service our Canadian fans.

Q.  Mark, what did you learn about effectively relaunching NHL hockey on TV that you can apply to NASCAR?  And my second question is for Brian:  Brian, are you getting an annual rights fee increase, and will we see any races on the new FOX Sports 1?

MARK LAZARUS:  What we learned from NHL is two things:  One, the ability to have both the broadcast element and the national cable element on NBC Sports Network allowed us to market and promote across both.  It also allowed us to build shoulder and ancillary programming around the content to consume and surround the fans that we know already like a sport or a property and give them more of that content.  And we will apply all of that to NASCAR.

We’ll also integrate our regional sports networks in that, as well.

The other part that I’ll add is what we have built with all of these tent pole properties is a team of dedicated people that work behind the scenes.  I’ve talked a little bit about our broadcasters and our talent, but when you take people that have worked either at NBC or at other places on these properties over time, and whether it’s John Miller, who does our programming, the other John Miller who does our marketing, Sam Flood, our executive producer, who understand the sport, are agnostic to whether it’s on broadcast or cable, we treat it the same no matter where it is, and the fact that they love the properties that we work on, it allows us to really put fans’ interests at heart, and that’s what we will do here.

BRIAN FRANCE:  Yes, an answer on the  — we will have both Cup and Nationwide on FOX Sports 1 at some level.

Q.  This one is for Mark:  I’m curious, why the 20 number?  Why didn’t you just go 23 and take them all?

MARK LAZARUS:  We were offered a package that had 20 in them, so we bought everything that was made available to us.  That doesn’t mean we bought everything we wanted.

Q.  And then in 2015 Speedweeks, FOX is the primary broadcaster, but are you figuring on having a lot of programming during the FOX side of the contract?

MARK LAZARUS:  We’ll be there as a news organization with the ability to cover it like other news organizations I would imagine, and some of this is still being ferreted out, that we’d have some ability to cover it as a little more than just a typical news organization.  But we’ll have shoulder programming and access, but we’ll be respectful of their rights and what they have bought, as we know they will be in our half of the season.

Q.  And then for Steve, you said that the remaining dates that are available, that you expect those to disappear pretty quick.  Is there any kind of rights battle going on, any kind of bidding war for those at this point?

STEVE HERBST:  I would just say that the rights are out there right now.  The package is there.  We expect it to move quickly, and we’ll be placing those in short order, and we’ll keep you posted.

Q.  Mark, lots of race fans are listening live right now, and the question is they know there’s a different philosophy or identity of each network.  What’s the generic philosophy of covering sports and news on sports for your network, and just a little bit more about what makes NASCAR so compelling for your network?

MARK LAZARUS:  Well, the mantra that we live by is two things:  One, we want to tell great stories, and NASCAR, what makes it so compelling is there are wonderful stories.  There are more than 40 drivers in every race.  It’s the all star game every weekend.  It’s the best athletes in the sport on the same playing surface at the same time, and it’s each and every week.  And whether that’s Saturday or Sunday, you have compelling programming, compelling stories, rivalries that get built over years and years and years.  It’s one of the rare sports where you can have multigenerational athletes competing against each other.  Every track is unique and still has its own stories.  It’s like a golf course in that way; each one has its own way of treating its athletes, and the athletes have to think differently about them, and each of the tracks are like that.

So the stories are incredibly compelling.  We believe that we take the time to develop those stories, develop the personality, make sure fans know the rivalries and why they should care about them, and that’s what we spend our time doing in all sports, and we think that NASCAR suits that production value very well.

Q.  This question is for Brian:  In 2015 when all of the new TV deals are in place, and I know there are still three races unaccounted for, but I think you can still answer this question; will the purses for the Sprint Cup Series races be higher in 2015 than they were in 2014?

BRIAN FRANCE:  Well, the purses are formulated not just off of TV revenue, obviously, and they’re formulated by a number of things.  But I anticipate that they certainly will be.  That would be my guess.

But yeah, this is obviously a lucrative    we wouldn’t have made the change if it weren’t a favorable arrangement for the industry financially, and it is, and everybody will benefit from that as every league does.

Q.  Brian, two questions:  Can you talk about the digital rights that will be a part of this?  In essence what will fans be able to    will there be essentially this version of RaceBuddy and how you envision the digital rights?  And can you talk about the tie in of NASCAR on Sunday afternoons leading into Sunday Night Football?  I would presume that’s part of the interest in all this.

BRIAN FRANCE:  Steve, I’ll let you address the digital rights on our side.

STEVE HERBST:  Yeah, we still hold rights for RaceBuddy.  NBC will have exclusive TV everywhere rights for its events and highlight rights for all of its NBC digital platforms.  Some of those are still developing and working through our digital chief Mark Jenkins, but that’s generally the snapshot there.

MARK LAZARUS:  Yeah, when you get to the fall, when you have not only our wonderful NASCAR schedule but our Sunday Night Football schedule and the beginning of our NHL season, our ability to promote across all three of those to each other we think will be beneficial to all three of those.  As we get closer and as the race schedule and the sanctions come through, we will work with NASCAR to lay out the schedule.  But we don’t anticipate any disruption in coverage for either NASCAR or the NFL due to this deal.  There’s enough latitude that we have with NBC and NBC Sports Network to make sure that doesn’t become an issue.  But we do see greatly the benefits of all of our fall properties being able to promote each other, somewhat overlapping but also to somewhat differentiated audiences, with the help of growing them all.

 

Should Stanley Cup games be on NBC Sports Network? Nearly 2.5 million more viewers for Game 4 on NBC

The question needs to be asked: Should the entire Stanley Cup Final air on NBC?

The difference was striking between Games 3 and 4. On Monday, Game 3 pulled in 4.04 million viewers on NBC Sports Network. The network is in 80 million homes.

Wednesday, NBC, which is in 115 million homes, took over for Game 4. Number of viewers: 6.49 million.

That’s a 61 percent increase. Why?

Quality of games: Boston dominated Game 3, winning 2-0. Meanwhile, Game 4 was a wild affair, with the Blackhawks finally taking a 6-5 victory in overtime. The rating peaked at 8.192 million viewers during the extra session, a huge number for hockey.

So some of the increase obviously has to be attributed to the quality of games. However, Game 2 also went to overtime. The game attracted 3.94 million viewers on NBC Sports Network.

OK, it can be argued that ratings build as you get deeper into a series. Well then, what about Game 1, which pulled in 6.4 million viewers for the triple overtime? The network: NBC.

Clearly, the fact that NBC is in 35 million more homes than NBC Sports Network means that many more people will have access to the biggest hockey games of the season. And that includes the casual viewer who doesn’t have much interest in hockey but might just tune in while channel surfing. Who knows? That person might have been intrigued by the terrific end to Game 4 and decide to watch Game 5.

That’s how hockey fans are born.

As I wrote Wednesday, airing Stanley Cup Final games on NBC Sports Network is a way to drive viewers to that network.

NBC Sports Network wants to grow its subscriber base from 80 million homes to nearly 100 million homes, or comparable to the distribution for ESPN. It wants potential viewers to call their cable operators and demand that the network either be added to their systems or put on a basic tier.

NBC knows it takes missing out on Stanley Cup Final games for people to make that call.

The NHL also has a vested interest in growing NBC Sports Network. The network is the main home for hockey, airing more than 100 regular season and playoff games. More subscribers means more potential hockey viewers.

But can the NHL afford to be missing out on a potential 1.5-2.5 million viewers and possibly future fans by airing Final games on NBC Sports Network?

It is a question that should be asked within Gary Bettman’s office and then addressed with NBC.

 

 

 

 

 

High praise: Emrick, Breen on top of games for biggest games: AA podcasts

Indeed, it has been a treat to listen to a pair of Mikes, Emrick and Breen, calling the respective finals in their leagues. And it is fitting that the NBA series is going a full seven tonight, and that Stanley Cup Final likely will follow suit.

Both play-by-play men deserve to go the distance.

As I’ve said before, Mike “Doc” Emrick has become the Vin Scully of hockey. He paints pictures with his own unique descriptions even though we’re watching the game on TV. More importantly, Emrick knows how to elevate the drama when everyone’s heart is beating a bit faster during crucial moments.

During the wild third period last night, Emrick summed it up for the viewers: “This is marvelous… It’s all a matter of getting your name on the Stanley Cup and getting a ring that’s so large to wear.”

Meanwhile, Breen’s style is to fit in seamlessly with the game he is calling. He complements the telecast, knowing exactly how to set up his quirky partner, Jeff Van Gundy. Yet when the big moment comes, as it did several times during Game 6, Breen rises to the occasion and delivers.

So a tip of the cap to Emrick and Breen. Thanks for making June so much fun.

********

To hear both men discuss their approaches and profession, check out Matt Yoder’s interviews with them for the Awful Announcing podcast series.

Here is the link for Emrick.

Here is the link for Breen.

 

Why NBC, NHL shut out by potential viewers by airing Stanley Cup Final games on NBC Sports Network

I received an angry text from my son, Matt, on Saturday night. He is working as an overnight camp counselor in Northern Wisconsin for the summer. He also is a big Blackhawks fan.

On Saturday, Matt and his friends went to the local bowling alley to watch Game 2. One problem: the bowling alley didn’t have the game on its TVs.

Matt’s text: “Unbelievable. NBC (in Northern Wisconsin) doesn’t have the freaking game on.”

At least he didn’t use another word.

I explained to him that Game 2 was on NBC Sports Network, which the bowling alley didn’t have on its cable system. Finally after scrambling through the bars of Northern Wisconsin, and most the first period, they found a place that had the game.

Others, though, weren’t as fortunate. I have heard many complaints about Games 2 and 3 airing on NBC Sports Network as opposed to NBC.

Here’s some explanation and analysis:

********

Why did NBC put those games on NBC Sports Network? The answer is simple. NBC wanted to expose viewers to its cable sports outlet.

While the move upset fans who don’t get NBC Sports Network, NBC got the desired result. Game 3 had nearly 4.01 million viewers, the second highest audience ever on NBC Sports Network (U.S./Japan Gold Medal Olympic soccer game had 4.4 million viewers), and an all-time high for hockey.

Game 2 on Saturday was close behind with just fewer than 3.964 million viewers.

However, and it’s a big however, the NHL is missing out on even higher ratings by agreeing to air the Final games on NBC Sports Network. Game 1 pulled in 6.4 million viewers on NBC.

Again, the reason is simple. NBC is available in 115 million homes. Currently, only 80 million homes receive NBC Sports Network.

That’s 35 million fewer homes who didn’t have access to NBC Sports Network for Games 2 and 3. Do the math, and it’s easy to see why the ratings were lower.

So if you’re the NHL and NBC, and you’re trying to grow hockey fan base, wouldn’t you want to be in as many homes as possible? Well, the answer is yes and no.

Yes, in the short term, the ratings would be higher for Final games on NBC. However, this is about the long term and growing NBC Sports Network.

NBC believes the main way to drive up ratings and more importantly, subscribers, is to air premium content on NBC Sports Network. Final games are premium content.

NBC Sports Network wants to grow its subscriber base from 80 million homes to nearly 100 million homes, or comparable to the distribution for ESPN. It wants potential viewers to call their cable operators and demand that the network either be added to their systems or put on a basic tier.

NBC knows it takes missing out on Stanley Cup Final games for people to make that call.

The NHL also has a vested interest in growing NBC Sports Network. The network is the main home for hockey, airing more than 100 regular season and playoff games. More subscribers means more potential hockey viewers.

And friends, cable is where this is all going when it comes to the biggest games. The BCS championship game already is on ESPN. Next year, the semifinals on Final Four Saturday will air on TBS. In 2016, TBS will begin a rotation where it gets the entire Final Four every other year. The large chunk of baseball’s postseason is on cable.

By the 2020s, it wouldn’t be a surprise if every title game in all the major sports, with the exception of the Super Bowl, is on cable.

As for this year, the remainder of the Stanley Cup Final will be on NBC, starting with Game 4 tonight. My son will be happy and so will people who don’t get NBC Sports Network.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Will Eddie Olczyk leave booth to return to run a team? Says he has ‘Unfinished business’

A colleague called the other day, raving about Eddie Olczyk as an analyst.

“He’s the best,” the colleague said. “He’s so quick. It’s amazing how he sees everything on the ice.”

Agreed.

NBC is thrilled to have Olczyk as its lead analyst on hockey, and his work on local Blackhawks telecasts is making him an icon in Chicago.

Yet the time might be coming where Olczyk gives up what he describes as “the best job in the world.”

Olczyk clearly has a bad taste from his only previous NHL stint behind the bench. He was fired in Dec., 2005 after a season-plus as head coach with Pittsburgh.

Now 46, Olczyk sounds as if the itch is intensifying to return as a coach or as a front office executive at some level. It might not happen next year, but to hear him talk, it wouldn’t be a surprise if he jumped back in sooner than later.

Olczyk repeatedly used the phrase “unfinished business” when the subject of his future came up during an interview.

“I’m a hockey guy,” Olczyk said. “There’s the unfinished business with the way I left Pittsburgh that’s always going to be there. Whether the opportunity presents itself remains to be seen. It’s always going to an enticing thought. It’s always going to be a stone I’m looking under.”

Olczyk noted that his family situation is changing. He has two boys playing college hockey, and a 16-year-old son who plays junior hockey and could be out of the house soon. Olczyk serves as an assistant coach for his son’s junior team when time allows.

“The stars would have to be aligned family-wise and professionally,” Olczyk said. “It may not occur. I am very content where I am. I take great pride in what I do. But there is that so-called unfinished business. When you get knocked down, you want to get back up and get at it again.”

It will be a tough call for Olczyk, considering what is coming up on the broadcast side. The Hawks are exploding in Chicago; he is part of a NBC/NBC Sports Network team (with Mike Emrick and Pierre McGuire) that is considered one of the best in sports; and he is set to work another Olympics for NBC in 2014.

Yet the pull of being part of the action again might trump all.

“When you’ve been involved in it, it’s always in you that you want to do it again,” Olczyk said.

*******

More from my interview with Olczyk:

On shortened season: Considering where we were six months ago, where you didn’t know if you would have a season, you couldn’t ask for a better Final. I use a phrase I used during the 2010 Olympics. It’s tremendously tremendous. It’s a win-win for everyone, except for the team that loses.

On the rise of the Blackhawks: As a kid, it was hockey, really? Now I couldn’t be prouder that hockey is front and center in our town. To me, a good indicator is that people are planning their day around the puck drop. For many years, it wasn’t like that.

On not winning a Stanley Cup for Blackhawks as a player: We lost to Edmonton in the conference finals (in 84-85) season. It’s still the record for the most goals in a six-game series. Edmonton may give up five goals, but they knew they could score eight.

Obviously, I’m disappointed we couldn’t win. I always dreamed of holding the Cup at home. I lived and died as a Blackhawks fan. To have not won it as a player was very disappointing.

On his place in the organization: This organization lives and breathes hockey 24/7. Everyone involved deserves the credit. To be part of the organization is very important to me. I know where I am on the totem pole. In the big picture, it’s very small. I do take pride that we’ve been able to teach the game and help sell the brand.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘While We’re Young,’ pros; Networks need to insist on faster play

The United States Golf Association’s “While We’re Young” ads were well done. However, there also are a bit of a joke.

How can the USGA tell the rest of the golf world to speed up play when the players at the U.S. Open moved slower than Chicago traffic in rush hour?

The final group (Phil Mickelson, Luke Donald, Bill Horschel) on Saturday took nearly 5 hours, 30 minute to complete their round. I know it’s the U.S. Open; it was threesomes; and the conditions were brutally hard.

But 5 hours, 30 minutes? It took them 2:50 to play the front 9. Ridiculous. Hey, it’s not as if the three players were scrambling to break 100.

I only wish Rodney Dangerfield were there to yell, “While we’re young.”

John Huggan wrote at GolfDigest.com:

On a course where they had thousands of ball-spotters on hand, three world-class golfers took an average of almost 20 minutes to complete every hole. To all of which there is only one conclusion: at least in terms of encouraging a reasonable pace of play, something is wrong with the way Merion has been set up and, by extension, the USGA’s warped view of how golf should be played. The message emanating from Far Hills, New Jersey is not “While We’re Young,” but “Do as we say, not do as we do.”

Later, Huggan added:

Throw in the fact that no professional on the PGA Tour has been penalized for slow play since Tim Finchem took over as executive director and it is clear that there is little or no enthusiasm for addressing this long-running (make that “long-crawling”) problem. So pardon me if I view this latest initiative with an appropriate amount of cynicism.

For some reason, the TV networks allow the slow-play parade to occur during big tournaments because it continues to fester. If they are complaining to Finchem and the USGA, they aren’t doing it loud enough.

In my view, slow golf makes for bad golf on TV. How many movies have you seen that would have been good at two hours, but were terrible at three hours?

Rounds that last 5 hours, 30 minutes become tedious affairs. The hardcore fans will tune in, but I am sure the networks lose casual fans who become bored by the lack of activity.

Publicly, network executives continue to say they don’t have an issue with pace of pro on the pro tours. Privately, though, I have heard they are lobbying top golf officials about the need to pick things up.

I’d like to say it will get done sooner than later, but as we’ve seen, nothing moves fast these days at the top tiers of golf.

 

 

Triple OT most-watched Game 1 since 1997; nearly 6.4 million viewers

Throw in massive ratings in Chicago and Boston, a triple overtime, and you get a terrific rating.

From NBC:

Last night’s triple overtime thriller (8 p.m.–1:06 a.m. ET) between the Boston Bruins and Chicago Blackhawks in the inaugural game of the 2013 Stanley Cup Final averaged nearly 6.4 million viewers, making it the most-watched Stanley Cup Final Game 1 in 16 years, the most-watched Game 1 ever on NBC (since 2006), and up 119% vs. last year.

The game — in which the Chicago Blackhawks defeated the Boston Bruins, 4-3, in an epic three overtimes — drew a 3.9 household rating and 6.358 million viewers, up 117% and 119%, respectively, vs. last year (L.A.-N.J., 1.8 rating, 2.902 million).

The 6.358 million viewers are the most to watch a Stanley Cup Final Game 1 in 16 years, just 9,000 viewers off Detroit-Philadelphia on FOX in 1997 (6.367 million), which stands as the most-watched Game 1 ever (since the advent of people meters in 1987). Last night’s game now stands as the second-most watched Game 1.

Viewership for the game peaked in the first overtime period (11:15-11:30 p.m. ET), which was filled with a flurry of action, with nearly 7.5 million viewers (7.444 million).

Bruins-Blackhawks was the No. 1 program of the day across both broadcast and cable among Adults 18-49 (tie, 2.5), Men 18-49 (3.1) and Men 25-54 (3.5). NBC was the top network in primetime (8-11 p.m. ET) for all key male demographics.

NBC is averaging 3.083 million viewers for its coverage of the 2013 Stanley Cup Playoffs, up 38% vs. the same time period in 2012 (2.226 million). For the entire playoffs, including last night’s game, NBC, NBC Sports Network and CNBC have combined to average 1.191 million viewers per game, up 7% vs. last year (1.116 million).

LOCAL

Boston received a 28.1 household rating, up 10% vs. the Bruins’ Game 1 rating for the 2011 Stanley Cup Final on NBC in the market (25.5). Chicago received a 25.1 household rating, up 49% compared to the Blackhawks’ Game 1 rating for the 2010 Stanley Cup Final on NBC in the market (16.9).

NBC was the No. 1 rated network overall in Boston and Chicago during the 8 p.m. – 1 a.m. ET time period. Following are the top five markets:

  1. Boston (28.1)
  2. Chicago (25.1)
  3. Providence (18.5)
  4. Buffalo (8.5)
  5. Milwaukee (6.1)

Tired in Chicago, Boston: Towns stayed up late to watch triple overtime thriller

People are dragging in Chicago and Boston today. However, it is a much happier tired in the land of the Blackhawks.

Both cities did huge numbers for the endless Game 1. In Boston, the game did a 28.5 rating, while Chicago averaged a 25.1 local rating.

As expected, the massive ratings generated by the nation’s third (Chicago) and seventh (Boston) markets had a profound effect on NBC’s overall rating. The network did a 4.8 overnight rating, which is the best for an NHL Stanley Cup Final Game 1 since 1997 (Detroit/Philadelphia on Fox: 5.2). You are going back a ways when you’re talking about Fox and hockey.

I don’t have the intervals for Boston, but Chicago, the game peaked with a 29.9 rating (nearly 1 million homes watching) at 10:30 p.m. Central during the first overtime.

A few people bailed as the marathon continued, but as you can see from the 15-minute ratings intervals, the vast majority stayed to the joyous end–at least in Chicago.

10:30pm – 29.9

10:45pm – 25.6

11:00pm – 27.1

11:15pm – 26.1

11:30pm – 23.1

11:45pm – 23.9