Flexing: Bears-Packers could be moved to primetime for week 17

NBC should thank Detroit. The Lions’ loss to Baltimore opens the door for Chicago-Green Bay to moved to prime time for NBC on the last Sunday of the season.

The flex rules for week 17 give the NFL (not NBC!) until Monday to make a decision. NBC, though, definitely will have input. The idea is to ensure Al Michaels and Co. have a meaningful game for the grand finale.

What could be better than a winner-take-all Bears-Packers game for the NFC North title in frigid Soldier Field? Throw in the likely return of Aaron Rodgers, the league’s oldest rivalry, and you’ve got plenty of storylines to satisfy Bob Costas.

Detroit’s loss dropped the Lions to 7-7, behind the Bears (8-6) and Packers (7-6-1). If the Bears beat Philadelphia; Green Bay defeats Pittsburgh; or the Giants beat Detroit on Sunday, the stage is set.

It would mark the second straight week the Bears would be flexed to Sunday night. Now a move from an afternoon game to night on Dec. 29 would be a major inconvenience to the many fans from Wisconsin who will be coming to Chicago to see the game. Bears fans will say, even more reason to shift the game.

Another candidate for week 17 is Philadelphia at Dallas for the NFC East title. That’s assuming the Cowboys don’t blow Sunday’s game at Washington, a definite possibility.

Option 3 would be Baltimore at Cincinnati for the AFC North title. That’s assuming the Ravens can get by New England Sunday, a big if.

However, No. 1 on NBC’s wish list to Santa has to be Bears-Packers. Dress warm, Al and Bob.

 

 

Q/A with author of book on ’70s Steelers: Examining unique bonds of ‘best team ever’

The Bears weren’t very good when I was a kid growing up in Chicago in the early ’70s. The Abe Gibron era left something to be desired.

As a result, I gravitated to another team. In 1972, I actually started to root for the Pittsburgh Steelers, pre- “Immaculate Reception.” Mainly, I liked their uniforms and this new young quarterback named Terry Bradshaw. It doesn’t take much more than that when you’re 12.

Officially, I like to think I was an early rider on the Steelers’ bandwagon. Soon I had plenty of company for a team that was beloved beyond the city borders of Pittsburgh.

Gary Pomerantz revisits those Steelers in a terrific new book, Their Lives Work: The Brotherhood of the 1970s Steelers, Then and Now. He tells the story of how the dynasty was built and then revisits the players more than three decades later. He shows that the bonds created from those great teams still remains strong.

Highly recommended.

In an email Q/A, Pomerantz discusses the book:

What were the origins of this project? How did you get involved?

I first met these Steelers in summer 1981 – 32 years ago. I was an impressionable, 20-year old sportswriting intern at The Washington Post, and my editors handed me a dream assignment: Go to the Steelers’ training camp in Latrobe, Pa. and spend a couple days to see if the NFL’s 1970s dynasty was finally finished.

Nearly all the team’s stars were still there. I interviewed Terry Bradshaw, Franco Harris, John Stallworth, Lynn Swann, Coach Chuck Noll. As I interviewed Mean Joe Greene, I thought, This guy’s bicep is wider than my thigh! All of these players moved with swagger. They were historic and knew it.  And they were all great interviews. They seemed lit from within. The array of talents and personalities on that team was arresting. Even a 20-year-old-sportswriting intern couldn’t miss that. Though I didn’t know it at the time, the seed for this book was planted way back then.

Now football is under the microscope.  With the game’s violence under scrutiny, the attention is on brain injury, surely football’s highest cost. I decided that if I was going to examine football for what it gives, and what it takes, who better to use as a case study than the best team I ever saw, those men I met in Latrobe 32 years ago?  In my narrative I would follow these men across the decades, through middle age and beyond, to explore football’s gifts and costs.

Why were those Steelers teams so special?

Well, it helps to have nine Hall of Fame players, including four selected in the first five rounds of the 1974 draft (Swann, Stallworth, Jack Lambert, Mike Webster), a drafting feat that has never been equaled.

The defense was the centerpiece of the Steeler empire with Mean Joe Greene, a destructive force of nature, as the alpha leader of the Steel Curtain defensive line. Study the Steeler defensive lineup in 1976: of those 11 players, 10 made the all-pro team at least once, and the eleventh, defensive tackle Ernie Holmes, was, when healthy, an annihilative force.

On offense, the Steelers running game was strong; running back Rocky Bleier was a fireplug lead blocker for Harris – “like having a third guard,” as Noll once said. As the NFL’s rules changed in the late 1970s, opening up the passing game, the Steeler offense necessarily evolved.  It possessed just the right components to make that adjustment: a more mature leader and downfield passer in Bradshaw, plus Swann and Stallworth as wide receivers; in the first two seasons under the new passing rules, this tandem caught a combined 213 passes for 33 touchdowns.

Just how good were the 1970s Pittsburgh Steelers? When the NFL named its 75th anniversary all-time team in 1994, these Steelers placed five players on that team: Webster, Greene, Lambert, Mel Blount, and Jack Ham.   Think about that: Of all the players who had played in the NFL across 7 ½ decades, FIVE were selected from the 1970s Steelers. By comparison, Lombardi’s 1960s Packers, the defining dynasty of the NFL’s first half-century, placed only two men on that team.

It seemed like there was an unique dynamic at the top. Owner Art Rooney was so open and friends with the players, while Chuck Noll was distant, aloof. How did those relationships impact the Steelers?

The 1970s Steelers players shared a love for Art Rooney Sr. (aka The Chief). On a team of great characters, the Chief was the greatest character of all. As the Steelers’ founding owner, he had been a lovable loser for 40 years. As a horse-playing gambler, though, he rated among the very best in all the land. It’s interesting to consider that the Chief’s initial investment in the franchise, $2,500 in 1933, less than he was wagering on some horse races, has paid off handsomely; the franchise’s value today has been estimated as high as $1.2 billion.

The Chief occasionally invited to his house for dinner some of his favorite Steeler players – Bradshaw, Greene, Harris, Dwight White, and their wives. Once he took Ray Mansfield and Andy Russell to the Belmont Stakes, and gave them a few bucks to wager. He remembered the names of his players’ wives and kids, and their birthdays, too.

Art Rooney Sr. was an American archetype, Irish-catholic, up from the streets of Pittsburgh’s north side, his leather-bound prayer book in one hand, the Daily Racing Form in the other. His players wanted to win one for the old man, and by the end of the decade they won four for him.

If the Chief was like a lovable Irish uncle, Noll was more like a stern taskmaster. He kept his emotional distance from his players, running the team more in the manner of a corporate chieftain. It mattered more to Noll that his players were close to each other than to him. Decades later, his former players aren’t close with Noll, but they view him with deep respect.

Talk about the bond that existed with the Steelers back then and still exists today.

Too often we hear it said that a team is like a family.  I don’t buy that, never have. Players and coaches bring widely varying biographies to the locker room. The share only a uniform, and a common purpose. They are NOT a family.

But brotherhood?  Oh yeah, I absolutely believe in that, and with the 1970s Steelers players that brotherhood remains authentic, deep, and impressive.

What did football give these Steelers? More than those four Super Bowl rings, it gave them each other.

Today’s NFL players will never know the depth of camaraderie that the 1970s Steelers had, and still have.  NFL players today jump from team to team for bigger and better contracts.

But the 1970s Steelers played in the years before free agency. Here is a remarkable statistic: Eight Steeler players – Joe Greene, L.C. Greenwood, Terry Bradshaw, Donnie Shell, Lynn Swann, John Stallworth, Jack Lambert and Jack Ham – played a combined 100 seasons in the NFL, a full century. Every one of those seasons they spent as members of the Pittsburgh Steelers.

They were teammates for a decade and more, and so they knew each other intuitively. They knew the women they loved, their favorite brands of beer and cigarettes. They saw each other bloodied and exultant, especially the latter as the greatest team of their time.

You can see and feel their brotherhood today in a hundred different ways. As Joe Greene spoke with me about his old friend Dwight White’s death in 2008 following back surgery, he wept.  Frenchy Fuqua and Reggie Harrison still talk twice a day, and have each other on speed dial. Mansfield and Russell hiked mountains together in the far west after they retired, and travelled the world together, too.  Stallworth kids call Donnie Shell “Uncle Donnie,” and Shell’s kids call Stallworth “Uncle John.”

Franco Harris hosts private dinners for his old Steeler teammates and their wives to commemorate the big anniversaries of the Immaculate Reception (1972) – the 25th, the 30th and just last December the 40th. Franco and his wife Dana rent out a nice restaurant in Pittsburgh, foot the entire bill, and hand out special keepsakes, once pearl necklaces for the wives, and last year cut-glass footballs from Tiffany’s engraved for the occasion. Franco told me that he is thinking about hosting these dinners for teammates every year because, as he said, “We are getting older and five years is a long time to wait.”

Who were your favorite interviews among the ex-Steelers? Also, was there anybody you wanted to talk to, but couldn’t get?

I conducted more than 200 interviews (in seven states) for this book. One Steeler player I’d hoped to interview but didn’t was Lambert.  I left a message on Lambert’s cell phone, but he didn’t get back to me. That’s been his way since he left the game thirty years ago.  He has showed up at a few Steeler reunions, but not many. He’s become more like a hermit, the J.D. Salinger of this team.

A few of my favorite Steeler players to interview?  Terry Bradshaw, Mean Joe Greene and John Stallworth stand out. Here’s why: In their own unique ways, they were all-in, engaged and engaging.

I interviewed Bradshaw at a Beverly Hills hotel where I discovered him registered under the name of Gary Cooper, a nice Hollywood touch.  Terry didn’t back down from any questions, and never has. He took on every one of them. He was fun and frisky, but also full of complicated emotions about his days with the Steelers.  Greene, who played the game with rage, remains emotional, except now he is emotional in a different way. Greene is, at 67, the only surviving member of the Steel Curtain front four. He has eulogized Dwight White, Ernie Holmes and, just a few months ago, L.C. Greenwood. He wept at all three of those funerals. Joe is a straight-up guy, no B.S. in him. He remains all about the team. Together, we watched a DvD of Super Bowl IX against the Vikings in his living room, and as the Steelers asserted control, Greene, watching from his couch, became joyful, and started chanting, “Here we go, Steelers, here we go!” He was young again, and frankly it was beautiful to see.

Stallworth was a Hall of Fame receiver, everyone knows that. But Stallworth also was a highly successful businessman. He earned his MBA while playing for the Steelers, and after retiring from the NFL in 1987, he returned to Huntsville, Ala. There, he built an information technology firm in the aerospace industry, which he later sold for $69 million. Stallworth is now a minority owner of the Steelers.  He is deeply thoughtful and introspective. He spoke of his former teammates with such devotion.

We should all be so lucky to have enduring friendships like these.

What was it like to interview Mike Webster’s ex-wife? How did his story play into the overall story of the Steelers?

I conducted multiple interviews with Pam Webster. She is a terrific lady. It’s difficult for most people to comprehend the despair that she and her family suffered. Mike Webster’s demise was slow, and torturous, and tore into the fabric of their family. In our interviews, Pam struggled to hold back tears.

Mike Webster was a Hall of Famer, obsessive in his year-round training regimen. Sometimes he pushed the blocking sled through his snow-filled yard in winter. That was Webby. He played 17 NFL seasons at center, a position no man should play in the NFL for 17 seasons. Sad to say, here is the shorthand summary of Mike Webster’s life: he retired from the NFL at 40, and died at 50, and in between he lost his money, his marriage and precipitating all of that, his mind. Near the end of his life, he lived out of his truck, ate meals bought from vending machines, and Super-Glued decaying teeth back into his mouth. At his death in 2002, he became the first NFL player diagnosed with CTE – Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, a neurodegenerative brain disease.  Mike Webster took too many hits to the head.

The 1970s Pittsburgh Steelers suffered their share of tragedies. Among Steelers players from the years of empire (1974-1979), twelve died before the age of 60.  They died from a variety of causes – cancer, heart attacks, accidents involving a car, a falling tree. Quarterback Joe Gilliam died at 49 from a cocaine overdose.  Among those dozen, Webster stands apart. The cause of his death was, unequivocally, football.

In a sense, Mike Webster’s death has reshaped, and darkened, the legacy of the 1970s Steelers.  In the archives of their legacy, next to those glorious highlight films and four Vince Lombardi Trophies and 12 busts in the Pro Football Hall of Fame (including Noll, the Chief, and Dan Rooney), must go the stained laboratory slides of Mike Webster’s brain.

On NFL Sundays, Pam and her son Garrett Webster sometimes watch Steelers games together. In front of the TV in Garrett’s apartment, they wear their Mike Webster jerseys. Both still love football.

What will be the legacy of the Steelers of the 70s?

Best team ever.

Dave Zirin: SI Sportsman of Year has become a QBs award; Manning ‘a dreadful choice’

Earlier today, I wrote that Sports Illustrated made the right choice in selecting Peyton Manning to be its Sportsman of the Year.

Dave Zirin disagrees. In his column for The Nation, he slammed SI’s selection. He made an interesting observation that it has become a quarterback’s award.

An award that used to be for trailblazers, social justice avatars, and people whose sense of fair play brought out the best angels in sports, had become the magazine cover equivalent of the SI Swimsuit issue: all image and no substance. You could easily envision SI’s editors slamming their desks shouting, “Find me a quarterback dammit! And he better have blue eyes and dimples!”

Since 2004, the magazine has had Tom Brady, Brett Favre, and Drew Brees as their Sportsperson of the Year. So what do they do to break the trend in 2013? They give it to Denver Broncos quarterback Peyton Manning: the same Peyton Manning who in 2013 hasn’t done more than throw a bunch of touchdowns, make a ton of commercials, and choke in the playoffs. In other words, a typical Peyton Manning season.

Later, Zirin writes:

Yet another story that has defined 2013 was the growing awareness of head injuries in the National Football League. What about choosing Dr. Robert Cantu, the NFL’s concussion expert who said that he did not believe children under 14 should be allowed to play the sport? It is comments like that that turn Roger Goodell’s face a shade to match his hair. That would have been a bold choice.

Then there is tennis. There was once a time when it was not unusual to see a tennis player, particular a woman tennis player, named Sportsperson of the Year. This past year we had Serena Williams make her case as perhaps the greatest to ever take the court. If she had been chosen, Serena would have been the first solo woman to take the honor since Mary Decker in 1983. Seriously.

Zirin rattles off other candidates, all of whom deserve consideration.

However, as I wrote earlier, it is hard to overlook Manning and what he’s done. This isn’t a typical season for a 37-year old quarterback.

 

Q/A with Colin Cowherd on new book: ‘Wanted to add substance to my career’

On a recent New York Times bestseller list that featured Bill O’Reilly, Malcolm Gladwell, Doris Kearns Goodwin, Sarah Palin, and even the ubiquitous Ron Burgundy, there was the name of Colin Cowherd.

Cowherd’s new book, You Herd Me!, checked in at No. 11. Pretty good company for a first-time author.

Cowherd’s appearance on the list speaks to the power of sports talk radio. Nothing like a little promotion on the ESPN brand.

However, it also says something about his following. While he definitely can be polarizing, I had several people tell me they were looking forward to getting his book.

If you like Cowherd’s radio and TV shows, you’ll like his book. It is essentially the written version of his on-air routine taken, he says, to a level he can’t do on radio.

Cowherd, with assistance from Tim Keown, opines on many subjects in his own unique way. He goes off in many various directions, including opening up about some personal things, not to mention exposing himself on the cover.

Here is my Q/A:

How surprised are you to see your name on the New York Times’ bestseller list?

It’s never something I thought I would be able to do. I didn’t want to make a book that would embarrass me. I don’t want to take any shots, but I’ve read some books from other people in sports talk radio and I didn’t think there was enough substance. I put three years into this. It was very substantial work for me.

I had no idea it would sell. People who talk about their books on sports talk radio tend to sell more books. To be on the New York Times bestseller list is pretty surprising.

How about the cover, exposing yourself in boxing trunks?

It wasn’t my idea. The publisher came to me and said, ‘You have a different kind of radio show, let’s do a different cover. You expose yourself. You take a lot of shots from people.’ I was like, ‘Is it too silly?’ However, in the end, that’s what the publishers do for a living. If you can increase sales because it doesn’t look like the typical cover, why not?

You look like you’re in good shape.

I work out a lot.

Would you have done the cover if you looked like, say, Chris Berman?

No comment.

You spout your opinions daily to millions of people on radio. What motivated you to do a book?

There are a lot of newspaper writers that can bloviate in the newspaper. Then they come on TV, and they are some of the funniest people around.

I’ve lived in the other world. I’ve been light my whole career. I wanted to add substance to my career. I wanted to add depth. I wanted to prove I can burrow in on a topic and provide context to things that maybe the PPMs in radio don’t allow you to do.

You know you’re polarizing. People either love you or hate you.

I just am that guy. There’s always going to be people who think it is artificial. But I argue with my wife. I argue with my producers. You just have to be yourself on the air. People know I’m self-deprecating, confident, neurotic. That’s who I am. If I have had any success, it is based on people getting a straight shooter. Sometimes, I’m too cocky, too confident, too shrill.

You have to take my show holistically and in its entirety. If you do, you’ll see someone who is committed, honest, tries to do the right thing, and is not perfect.

You went into some personal stuff in the book. Why?

When you give, people give back. If you unveil yourself to the audience and show your fears, your audience gives back. I don’t want to talk at my audience. I want to talk to my audience. I don’t want to have a wall. If I’m sad or afraid of something, I share it. If I tell my therapist that, why not tell my audience?

If that makes me vulnerable, so be it. I’m seen as a straight shooter. If you’re a straight shooter, you have to expose your flaws, your fears and weaknesses.

What subjects stood out for you in the book?

I think the one where I talk about loneliness. I like where I talk about LeBron and Michael Jordan because I’m not reverential to them. I like when I unveil something that maybe hasn’t been said. I like when I take people, and they go, ‘Wow, that’s interesting I never thought of that.’ Maybe Peyton is his own worst enemy? Maybe Nike is the reason LeBron isn’t as popular as Michael Jordan?

I like people who make you think. Jon Stewart makes you think. Andy Rooney made me think. Interesting writers make me think. That’s the kind of content I wanted to produce.

Tim Keown helped you write the book. How did that work out?

I’m at my worst when I feel like I’m the smartest guy in the room. I’m at my best when I’m in a room where I have to bail water to keep up. That’s what I felt with Tim. He pushed me. He asked me questions that forced me to come up with real answers. We took out the sandpaper and smoothed out the edges.

Will there be a sequel?

That’s a good question. I don’t know. I have an idea for a second book. But I won’t do it without Tim. Basically, I’ve put enormous pressure on Tim.

 

Sportsman of the Year: Sports Illustrated got it right with choice of Peyton Manning

It’s really hard to argue with Sports Illustrated’s choice, although many people will.

No, Peyton Manning didn’t win the Super Bowl in February. Failing to win the big game always will be the knock against the Denver quarterback.

But guess what? He has the Broncos in position again. He’s doing it with a video game offense producing all-time record numbers. With two games to go, he has 47 TD passes and has thrown for 4,811 yards. Damn, why did I skip over Manning in my fantasy draft?

And this is from a 37-year old quarterback who supposedly was done two years ago.

Even more, Manning easily is the most-watched athlete in 2013. The Broncos, it seems, are featured in one of the national windows almost every week, pulling in the biggest ratings for the various networks.

The reason? Peyton Manning. When he’s on, I’m watching, and so are you.

Sports Illustrated made the right choice.

Here is the link to Lee Jenkins’ story.

 

Good read: Pat Jordan writes about his good friend Tom Seaver

I mean, it really doesn’t get much better than this.

In a piece for Sports on Earth, Pat Jordan travels to Napa Valley to visit with his old friend, Tom Seaver. Two legends talking about baseball and life. Only wish someone had been filming it.

Then again, who needs a camera when Jordan is writing? I’m fairly sure you will be seeing this story again in the 2014 edition of Best American Sports Writing.

Please take the time to read this story.

From the piece:

He walked around the truck in that shoulder-weary, graceless, plowman’s walk that he always had, even when he was a young pitcher with the Mets. He was always a blue-collar pitcher, plodding to the mound as if to a hated, backbreaking job; always the dray horse who had to plow the fields, never the thoroughbred. He wasn’t born Tom Seaver, The Franchise, with a blinding, God-given talent. He made himself into Tom Seaver through a monumental act of will. Years of painstaking, meticulous, disciplined, intelligent, hard work.

We shook hands. He said, “Your beard got white.” I said, “No shit.” He laughed, and I added, “You forget I’m older than you, Tom.” He said, “That’s a fact.” I said, “And smarter, too.” He hung his head and said, “Aw, I don’t know about that.”

We sat at a table in the deli and ordered breakfast. Tom spread a newspaper on the table and studied it. When he was a famous pitcher, he opened the newspaper every morning and studied the previous night’s box scores. Now, he studied the weather to check on his “babies.”

When I’d called him a few weeks before, very early in the morning, he answered the phone out of breath. I said, “It’s me.” He said, “I know.” I said, “What are you doing?” He said, “I was sleeping until you woke me up.” I said, “Oh, geez, Tom, I’m sorry. I forgot the time difference.” I heard his evil cackle, and then he said, “I’ve been up two hours, watching the sun rise.” I said, “You prick!” He laughed. I said, “You’re out of breath, watching the fucking sun rise?” He snapped, “I was working, for chrissakes, taking care of my babies.” I said, “Your grandkids are there?” He said, “No, my babies. My grapes.” I said, “Tom, you gotta get a life.”

But of course, he had a life, a new one — Tom Seaver, owner of The Seaver Family Vineyards on Diamond Mountain — which was why I’d called him in the first place. “One last story,” I’d said. “You and your babies.”

Weekend wrap: An all-time day for NFL RedZone; What is it like to cover NFL? Dickie V

Spanning the globe to bring you the constant variety of sports media….

RedZone: Neil Best of Newsday talks to Scott Hanson, my hero, about last Sunday’s terrific day for viewing on RedZone.

It still was early afternoon in Southern California, but it already had been a full day at NFL RedZone headquarters, what with snow falling in several stadiums, touchdowns coming at a record pace and a series of frantic finishes.

“When those games ended, when the dust settled, we looked around at each other in the studio and were like, ‘Did that all really just happen?’ ” host Scott Hanson recalled three days later. “It was like watching a movie where you think you hit the crescendo and now a new thing makes your jaw drop. It seemed like whenever one finished, the next one outdid itself.”

NFL beat writers: Richard Deitsch at MMQQ does a roundtable on issues and obstacles in covering the NFL.

HOW DO YOU IMAGINE YOU WILL DEFINE THIS JOB FIVE YEARS FROM NOW? 

Keim: I don’t know that it would change a whole lot from now as much as it will just continue to evolve, but I do think the way social media is going and with more teams enhancing game-day experiences, that the ability to go beyond what is seen will be more important. Some teams already have apps that allow fans at a game to watch replays from various angles. In five years, I’d imagine everyone will have that ability, and I think that makes fans smarter. That means writers have to keep pace and provide their unique perspective and work even harder to not tell you what happened but why. I also think the need to be multidimensional will increase with the rise in videos in particular.

Dickie V: Richard Deitsch at SI.com talks to Dick Vitale, who at 74 wants to keep broadcasting forever.

Dick Vitale is crying. This is not uncommon for the 74-year-old ESPN broadcaster. Vitale readily admits he is an emotional man, especially on the subject of his professional mortality. While there is always a lot of performance with Vitale, this moment during a 45-minute phone conversation appears genuine. The question was a simple one: How often do you think about when your broadcasting career will come to an end?

“I want to do it forever, obviously,” said Vitale. “We all do. I see Vin Scully and I get excited. It gets me emotional, really. Thinking about the day it is over, I know it is going to tear my heart apart. I love it, man. I love it. …

He is choked up. He puts down the phone. He needs to gain his composure.

“But I do think about it, man,” he continued. “You can’t hide the number (his age). I can’t hide the number. I told my wife when I came back from doing the [Duke-Michigan] game last Tuesday that I walk into the arena and the kids chant “Dickie V, Dickie V.” I go over to them, give them high fives and I can’t tell you the rush it gives me. I get emotional about this a lot. I have shed some tears about it.”

Dickie V 2: Michael Bradley also writes about Vitale for the National Sports Journalism Center site at Indiana.

Except for Chris Berman, there is no one who symbolizes ESPN more than Vitale. And since Berman generates far more animus – at least if you read the media reviews of his work – than does Vitale, Dickie V may actually be a more accurate personification of the entertainment and sports giant. Some people love him. Others can’t stand him. And that’s the way it is with ESPN. There is no middle ground.

Curt Schilling: Bob Raissman of the New York Daily News talks to Schilling about his new role as an analyst for ESPN’s Sunday Night Baseball.

“(As a player) I remember saying this is something I would never do,” Schilling said. “At one point there was animosity on my end to the people doing this. I felt there was a lack of accountability at times. I didn’t like to hear things from people who I would never see. So, going into the clubhouse and being around the managers and players is something that will be part of my job.”

QBs and media: John Branch of the New York Times writes how different Russell Wilson and Colin Kaepernick are in dealing with the media.

Wilson is a smooth and polished speaker, eager to please with his effusiveness and politeness. He is “a human Hallmark card,” as the Seattle columnist Art Thiel called him.

Kaepernick behaves like a schoolboy banished to the principal’s office. His microphone is where well-intended questions go to die.

“Stop acting like a jerk,” one San Francisco columnist wrote this season.

John Ourand: Matt Yoder of Awful Announcing does a podcast with the media writer for Sports Business Daily, reviewing the year in sports media.

Joe Tessitore: The ESPN announcer talks about his upcoming role with the SEC Network in a podcast with Ken and Keith at Sports Media Weekly.

Ted Leonsis: Alex Silverman of the Povich Center for Sports Journalism writes about Leonsis’ view of media in the ever-changing climate.

The former AOL executive who boasts he “sent the first AIM instant message,” advised aspiring journalists and media executives to find companies with “green arrows,” those that create value and have multiple revenue streams. The traditional media industry is shrinking and is not helping young people develop their skills they way it once did.

For this reason, Leonsis believes it is imperative for students to find companies that see the value in a “double bottom line,” one that is not only about profit but also about contributing to the greater community. To Leonsis, sports is the ultimate double bottom line business. He knows if the Wizards start winning, “the community will go crazy,” and added he does not let business decisions get in the way of trying to win. Community conscious businesses grow the fastest and have the happiest employees, according to the Georgetown graduate.

Snowed out: Bob Wolfley of the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reports that viewers in Milwaukee missed an important part of Sunday’s Packers game because of extended weather coverage during a break.

We all understand TV is obsessed with weather coverage. But to the point it actually trumps a Packers’ game telecast? That’s insane.

There are some other words that come to mind about the decision to pre-empt live Packers game coverage to give us traffic and weather news.

Incompetent is one. 

Shameful is another.

 

 

Flashback: My lunch with Desmond Howard day after his famous Heisman pose

With the Heisman Trophy being announced Saturday, I thought I would share my favorite Heisman story from my years on the college beat in the late 80s and early 90s.

I covered Desmond Howard’s final home game at Michigan in 1991 when he capped a punt return for a touchdown by striking the Heisman pose in the endzone. The snapshot will endure forever.

Yet what I remember most is what happened the next day. On a quiet Sunday, Howard, the toast of Ann Arbor, Michigan, and the entire country, met me for lunch at a hotel.

The Michigan sports information department set up the interview. I was stunned that he agreed, given all the commotion. Surely, he had better things to do (like sleep) than have lunch with me on the day after his signature game against Ohio State.

“No, he’ll be there,” I was told.

Sure enough, Howard showed up, unescorted.

We sat in a corner table, and I remember the startled reaction from the waitress when she realized she was serving the soon-to-be Heisman Trophy winner.

Howard and I chatted for about 90 minutes. He was an uncommon young man back then.

Looking back, I wonder if a reporter would get that same kind of access in today’s media age. Somehow, I doubt it.

I went back and found the Chicago Tribune story I did from that memorable interview.

For the better part of 90 minutes over lunch, the conversation didn`t focus on football. Rather, the young University of Michigan student preferred to talk about his encounter with a famous sociologist, black heritage, his talks at juvenile homes, his desire to become a Ph.D., among his other areas of interest that are far away from the field.

It`s the other side of Michigan wide receiver Desmond Howard, the side people didn`t care about when he was sitting in the restaurant. A steady stream of autograph seekers, at least 10, visited the table, and they didn`t want to know Howard`s views on society.

“Great punt return against Ohio State, Desmond.“

“You`re amazing to watch, Desmond.“

“I don`t know much about sports, but my son would kill me if I didn`t get your autograph, Desmond.“

Some people were courteous, and some were rude. And Howard`s star only is beginning to rise. It`s little wonder that Michael Jordan can`t go out in public.

Howard, though, didn`t seem to mind. After all, if he weren`t a star, he`d be just another student.

But, he cautions, don`t stereotype him as just being another football player. There`s much more to Desmond Howard than reinventing thrills in the open field.

“Being a football player is a part of me,“ he said. “But it`s not the biggest part of me.“

Later I wrote:

“You don`t learn about history by just reading books,“ Howard said.

“They don`t teach you that stuff in school. I like to seek out knowledge. Being a scholar has been very rewarding. I want to investigate things for myself.“

Toward that end, Howard tells of seeking out Harry Edwards, the noted sociologist and black leader. As a freshman, Howard heard Edwards speak, and something registered.

So much so, that when Howard was visiting a friend in California, he made him drive up to the University of California-Berkeley, where Edwards teaches, to meet him. Howard didn`t have an appointment; he just showed up on his doorstep.

“I heard him say some things that I hadn`t heard before,“ Howard said.

“I was interested in all the things he`d been through. I wanted to meet him.“

Howard also foreshadowed what he wanted to do after football.

Beyond football, Howard wants a career as a public speaker. That`s why he`s majoring in communications.

“I`ve been around a lot of college professors who don`t have the ability to hold an audience,“ Howard said. “That`s where the communications comes into play. I want to be an effective speaker.“

 

 

 

Heisman Trust has right to enforce non-disclosure or else mandate on voters

My latest column for the National Sports Journalism Center at Indiana is on the mandate from the Heisman Trust that voters don’t reveal their choices prior to Saturday’s announcement. While I’m all for transparency, voting for the Heisman isn’t a right. It is a privilege.

Here’s some excerpts:

******

Journalists really don’t like to be told what to do. Tell us to go left, and we’ll go right.

In retrospect, the Heisman Trust should have sent a letter to voters demanding that they reveal their choices prior to the award announcement Saturday.

I could see the reaction. “No way. Nobody’s making me write a column disclosing my vote.”

Who knows? It might have worked.

Instead, the Heisman Trust took the opposite approach. It sent out letters to voters who revealed their selections last year in advance of the announcement. Last spring, Dennis Dodd of CBSSports.com wrote (insert link: http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/story/22030795/giving-up-my-heisman-vote-before-getting-stiffarmed) about what showed up in his mailbox:

“Your letter arrived with the names “Johnny Manziel,” “Manti Teo” and “Collin Klein” highlighted from my column with a yellow marker like I had cheated in class.

“We had until April 8 to atone for our sins — aka promise “in writing” we would hide our ballots from public consumption after the voting deadline (early December). Even then, you stated regional and state representatives “will take your explanation into consideration when determining the 2013 electorate.”

In other words, vote and then shut up. Or lose your vote forever.

******

I’m all for transparency as a journalist, and I should know better than to disagree with Dodd, a long-time friend and one of the best in the business. But you know what? I think the Heisman Trust is justified in making this request.

Now we can write forever on the flaws in the voting set-up and the ridiculous number of voters (more than 900), many of whom have little idea what’s happening in college football. But that’s a story, or book, for another day.

However, voting for the Heisman Trophy isn’t a right; it is a privilege. This isn’t marking a ballot for president of the United States. This is selecting the top college football player of the year. Big difference.

It’s the Heisman’s proverbial ball here. If you don’t want to play by the rules, then don’t vote.

Here’s a simple solution: Write about your vote after the winner is announced. In fact, you could have the column ready to go immediately after the envelope is opened. Just click a button.

(Note: Since writing the column, I wrote today the challenge too stay mum is harder for sports talk radio host and TV analysts who have a vote.)

Chisholm argues that more transparency is required in the voting process. I agree. Fans should know who voted for who.

Now would it hurt to wait until Saturday night? Both Dodd and Chisholm contend that all the pre-announcement disclosures of votes helps build the audience for the Heisman announcement. Chisholm writes:

“After all, what I do is part of the hype machine.  In 2009, the closest Heisman race ever (Ingram/Gerhart/McCoy/Suh/Tebow) led to the biggest ratings ever.  The Heisman Trust even bragged about it in a press release.  There’s just one problem:  If it were up to the Heisman folks, no one would have had ANY idea that it was going to be a close race.  It was MY site that told the world that it would be close.  I led SportsCenter on Friday night that year.  3.78 million people watched the show — and I had 1.3 million page views during the two weeks prior to the show.  I helped create that huge level of hype for them.”

It’s a valid argument. Perhaps the Heisman Trust will discover the pre-announcement polls and vote disclosures are beneficial. But that’s a decision it has to make.

For now, the Heisman Trust wants voters to keep their ballots to themselves prior to the announcement. Like it or not, it’s their trophy.

 

Oops: Paul Finebaum realizes he wasn’t supposed to reveal Heisman vote in interview with Olbermann

After Paul Finebaum said he selected Jameis Winston, he realized he violated the Heisman Trust’s edict for voters not to disclose their selections.

“By the way, I just did something that will excommunicate me,” he said.

The mandate, though, does present a problem for sports talk radio hosts and TV analysts, of which Finebaum is both. How are they not supposed to talk about their choices in the week leading up to the announcement, especially when they are on the air for several hours per day?

For instance, I heard Chris Russo, who also is a Heisman voter, reveal his ballot the other day on Mad Dog Radio. He is voting for Winston.

Will be interesting to see what kind of response Finebaum and Russo receive from the Heisman folks.