New SEC-ESPN deal runs through 2034; SEC Network begins in 2014

What’s the over-under on how many SEC national championships in football through 2034? I’m going with 17.

Here are the details:

Southeastern Conference sports — including football and basketball — will have a 24-hour-a-day home when the SEC Network launches in August 2014.

The SEC and ESPN announced a 20-year agreement and rights extension on Thursday. The deal includes a new television network and digital platform that will show SEC sports 24/7, including more than 1,000 events in the first year.

Included in the programming will be 45 football games, more than 100 men’s and more than 60 women’s basketball games, 75 baseball games and selected events from the other 17 SEC sports. The network will also feature studio shows and coverage of special events such as signing day and football pro days.

The digital network, which will launch nationally with AT&T U-verse, will show hundreds of additional events. Each SEC school will have the opportunity to produce and develop content for various platforms. The network will be based in ESPN’s offices in Charlotte, N.C.

The extension means the SEC will have its games on ESPN’s family of networks, plus the SEC Network, through 2034.

“The SEC Network will provide an unparalleled fan experience of top quality SEC content presented across the television network and its accompanying digital platforms,” SEC commissioner Mike Slive said in a statement. “We will increase exposure of SEC athletics programs at all 14 member institutions, as we showcase the incredible student-athletes in our league. The agreement for a network streamlines and completes an overall media rights package that will continue the SEC’s leadership for the foreseeable future.”

“The SEC is unmatched in its success on the field and its popularity with fans nationwide,” said ESPN president John Skipper. “The new network’s top-quality SEC matchups across a range of sports will serve all sports enthusiasts including the most passionate, die-hard SEC fans. Also, it will serve the needs of our multichannel distributors and advertisers by providing extremely attractive programming options across all platforms.”

Big Lead: Charissa Thompson set to join Fox Sports; Is ESPN opting not to pay big money to keep talent?

Jason McIntyre reports Charissa Thompson is leaving ESPN.

And here’s the key takeaway from McIntyre:

Sources tell me that Erin Andrews – who is close friends with Thompson – going to Fox last year and Michelle Beadle going to NBC, along with Rachel Nichols leaving ESPN for CNN this year, have sent salaries soaring for women on TV talking sports.

And with NBC and Fox trying to compete with ESPN, the easy move is to pluck its high profile talent. This backs ESPN into a corner: Does it try and match the rumored offers – I’ve heard anywhere from $600k a year to $800k for Andrews, Beadle and Nichols – to retain talent, or let them walk and find the next rising star? I think it’s clear from these four departures that ESPN has made a decision.

Obviously, ESPN is picking and choosing who they want to keep. Who is worth the big money?

Meanwhile, for those who left, the decision goes beyond money. They received expanded opportunities from their new networks.

Coming soon: Releases from ESPN on talent who stayed with network.

 

 

Did he forget? Don Cherry actually was first coach to let woman reporter in his locker room

Robin Herman was amused by Don Cherry’s absurd and dated rant about how women reporters shouldn’t be allowed in the locker room.

Back in 1975, Herman became the first female reporter to covering the NHL. Only 23 at the time, she covered the beat for the New York Times.

In an open letter to Cherry on espnW, Herman called the former Boston Bruins coach her “hero.” Lo and behold, it turns out he was the first coach to allow her into the locker room.

I’d gotten a lot of publicity for breaking “the locker room barrier” at the 1975 NHL All-Star Game in Montreal, but that was a one-off. You were the first coach in the NHL to allow me, a female, accredited sports reporter and member of the Professional Hockey Writers’ Association, into your locker room as a matter of policy. You were coaching the “Big Bad Bruins,” and it was ironic that a team with that reputation should be the most forward-thinking in the NHL. Your PR man par excellence, Nate Greenberg, had persuaded you this was the way to go. I was The New York Times’ reporter on the NHL beat, after all, and Nate knew his job was to get great coverage of the Bruins. He and you were gentlemen. And GM Harry Sinden, as gruff and penny-pinching as he was, also had a heart of gold and a sense of what was right. The times they were a-changin’ then, and the Bruins organization was smart enough to realize it. You should be proud of what you did.

Herman concludes:

By the time I left The New York Times’ sports department in 1978, all but four teams in the NHL were allowing female reporters into locker rooms for postgame interviews. Shortly after that, open doors and equitable treatment of female reporters became league policy. The NHL was, in spite of itself, a leader in social change. And I was glad to see the NHL on Monday promptly reaffirm its open-access policy that has existed now for so many decades.

Remember, Don?

OK, I guess a lot of time has passed since then, and maybe you’ve forgotten the details. But I certainly wouldn’t forget the first coach and team to give equal access to a female member of the Professional Hockey Writers’ Association. Don, you were my hero.

 

Posted in NHL

ESPN The Magazine at 15: More themes, less eye noise; editor downplays competition with SI

ESPN The Magazine celebrates its 15th anniversary this week, even if Robert Griffin III looks a bit underwhelmed.

That’s no small feat in a publishing climate that has seen the print versions of iconic magazines disappear. So long Newsweek and The Sporting News.

ESPN The Magazine still is big, bold, and can be out there at times. However, under Chad Millman, who took over at editor in 2011, it has sharpened its focus with each edition having a theme. Also, some of the loud bells and whistles that marked the early design have been toned down a bit.

Here’s my Q/A with Millman on the current state of the magazine and whether it will be around for a 30th anniversary in 2028.

How has the magazine (first cover) evolved since 1998?

We’re still very much about great storytelling. It’s in our DNA. We get phenomenal access and our photography can’t be matched because of the size of the magazine.

The conversation, though, has changed. What the magazine was good at in the beginning are what blogs are good at now. The front of the magazine used to be more in tune with pop culture. It’s less now because blogs do a better job of that. So we have made some changes to remain current and relevant.

Such as?

We decided to have a theme for every issue. We asked ourselves, ‘Why can’t we make every issue as good the “Body Issue?’ Once you get a rhythm, you find ideas that become a franchise, such as One Day/One Game. Teams really have bought into it. We had a picture of LeBron James and Dwyane Wade reading texts in a cold tub. You don’t normally get to those places in sports.

The strategy helps frame what we’re doing. It helps define the storytelling. It also galvanizes the stuff and gets everyone behind a big idea.

What is going on from a design standpoint? Initially, there was much criticism that the graphics and look were too over-the-top. It seems as if the volume, so to speak, has been turned down in recent years?

Yes, it has. In Oct., 2011, we hired John Korpics. He’s a legendary creative director. The magazine always is going to be known for its design. We still wanted a modern look, but we wanted to make it easier to navigate. Instead of saying we’re toned down, I would say we’re cleaner looking. There’s definitely a better marriage.

How do you view the Magazine in regards to Sports Illustrated?

I don’t think anyone around here thinks about what Sports Illustrated is going to do. I like to see what Sports Illustrated has done. I worked at Sports Illustrated for five years. I know (new managing editor Chris Stone). I like him a lot. He’s really smart. I think it is a healthy change with him taking over.

But I don’t spend a lot of time thinking about how Sports Illustrated is going to cover something. I know there is a comparison. We have two different approaches. They often cover what just happened. We cover what’s going to happen.

You say you don’t think about SI from a competitive standpoint, and yet they broke a huge story this week with Jason Collins. How did you feel about that?

With SI and Collins, of course I wanted ESPN The Magazine, and ESPN in general, to be where an athlete chose to share that personal story. We had done similar pieces with Esera Tuaolo and John Amaechi and Sheryl Swoopes. But it isn’t a “gotcha” type piece and you can’t predict who is going to be comfortable with whom and when. SI did a nice job working with Jason and packaging his story.

Do people still read magazines these days?

We had a focus group two months ago. Guys everywhere from 18-35. We found that the group on the older end was skeptical about the future of the print press. However, the younger end said they still would rather read the actual magazine than on a tablet.

I know there’s a big difference when we ask an athlete to be on the cover of ESPN The Magazine than calling someone to be part of a digital product.

At the end of the day, who the hell knows? I don’t think the magazine has a readership problem right now.

The Magazine just celebrated its 15th anniversary. Given the way the publishing industry is going, what are the odds of a 30th anniversary?

That’s a great question. The interesting thing about working in Bristol is that you see how quickly things change. Three years ago, nobody was talking about apps and Twitter. Now they are huge parts of how ESPN engages fans.

It’s sort of feels like an exercise in folly to figure out if there will be a 30th anniversary. I’m just trying to make sure we’re relevant now. We want to be relevant five years from now. We want to adapt to different mediums and different ways we tell our stories.

Note: Here’s a link to my column on the Magazine at the National Sports Journalism Center site.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home TV edge: Expect NHL, NBC to feature Blackhawks, Penguins during playoffs

It’s all about numbers, which is why you will see the Chicago Blackhawks and Pittsburgh Penguins in the featured broadcast windows with the A-team announcers during the playoffs.

Not only are the teams national draws, but their hometown ratings are off the charts. The impact those local ratings will have on the national numbers makes NBC officials very happy, assuming both teams continue to win.

Game 1 of the Blackhawks-Minnesota series averaged 280,000 viewers on Comcast Sports Net Chicago Tuesday, with a peak of 418,000 during overtime. Those ratings figure to go up dramatically during the playoffs. Little wonder why NBC officials were relieved to see the Hawks pull out Game 1. Privately, of course.

As for Pittsburgh, the Penguins averaged a 12.56 local rating on Root Sports this year. It is the highest for any sports team in a local market since the Boston Red Sox pulled a 12.20 rating in 2007. Again, those numbers definitely will soar during the playoffs.

NBC Sports executive Sam Flood addressed Pittsburgh’s ratings power during a conference call Tuesday.

“You go to the Stanley Cup Final back-to-back; you win the Stanley Cup Finals, and you have a couple of the most marketable players in the game; your club is going to draw attention,” Flood said. “You know, market size doesn’t always drive ratings, sometimes it’s a passionate fan base and also stars that people are familiar with.

“You’re hear the name Crosby, you hear Malkin, you know what’s coming on the ice. And you know that it’s a pretty special thing to watch and people get can appreciate greatness.”

Beginning with the second round, the playoffs will be exclusively on NBC’s platforms. So NBC has plenty of reason to pull for the Blackhawks and Penguins, not to mention big-market draws like the New York Rangers and Boston Bruins.

“If it’s a Chicago-Pittsburgh final, that’s a different number than a Montreal-Vancouver final,” Flood said.

Of course, if it is Ottawa-San Jose in the finals, all bets are off.

*******

For my Chicago readers, the regular season numbers are astounding, especially compared to what we saw back in the dark ages a few years ago.

From Comcast SportsNet Chicago:

Comcast SportsNet, the television home for the most games and most comprehensive coverage of the NHL Western Conference #1-seed Chicago Blackhawks (36-7-5, 77 pts. during the regular season, earning them the Presidents’ Trophy for the league’s best overall record), posted the highest Blackhawks final regular season TV ratings average in the history of Chicago regional sports television — a 5.38 household season average rating (approx. 187,482 households watching per game)which is a 73% increase over last season’s 3.11 previous record final average (an increase of 79,183 more households tuning in per game this season).

In addition, Comcast SportsNet’s record-setting 5.38 Blackhawks regular season household average in the Chicago market this year is a 94% increase from the final season average two years ago (2.78) — a 121% increase from the final season average three years ago (2.44) — a 327% increase from the final season average four years ago (1.26) — and an astounding 754% increase from just five years ago (0.63).  Source for all ratings information is provided by Nielsen Media Research. 

 

 

 

 

Posted in NHL

Not moving: Press box will remain in same location at new Wrigley Field

Finally some good news for the media as it relates to press facilities.

According to the Cubs, the press box will remain in the same spot for the renovated version of Wrigley Field; detailed plans for the entire project were announced today. It currently is in the upper deck behind home plate. With Wrigley’s cozy confines, the press box is a great perch for watching baseball.

This decision hardly was a given considering what has occurred elsewhere. Across town, the White Sox shifted their press box from behind the plate to a position behind first base stretching down the right field line. They transformed the old press box, which had an outstanding view, into a premium seating area with all the amenities.

The Sox are hardly alone. The Los Angeles Angels have done the same thing, and you can expect other teams to follow suit. Meanwhile, several NFL football stadiums now feature press boxes in the corner as opposed to the 50-yard line, where teams get big bucks for luxury suites. In many arenas, elevated broadcast and writers positions in the rafters can induce altitude sickness.

Of course, as I wrote earlier today, Churchill Downs eliminated the press box for Saturday’s Kentucky Derby.

So it hardly would have been a shock if the new Wrigley featured a press box down one of the lines. Instead, not only is it staying put, it also will be redesigned.

Only the best for Paul Sullivan, the Cubs’ long-time beat writer for the Chicago Tribune.

 

 

 

 

Posted in MLB

Booted out: Churchill Downs eliminates press box for Kentucky Derby; Most media will watch on TV

Rick Bozich notes there was a time when Churchill Downs couldn’t do enough for the media. Legendary track president Matt Winn, who made the Kentucky Derby what it is today, knew it was vital to get press coverage in the early 20th Century.

So when asked for his reaction about Churchill Downs eliminating the press box for this year’s Kentucky Derby, Bozich, the long-time Louisville columnist, thought of Winn.

“You don’t need a comment from me,” Bozich writes in an email. “You need one from Colonel. Matt Winn. His plan for turning the Derby into America’s horse race began with convincing the media that they were as important to this spectacle as a good 3-year-old. Well, we had a good run, Colonel”

Indeed, the “Who-Needs-the-Media” tour moves to Churchill Downs this week.

The fabled track actually one-upped the NCAA, which cut back 2/3s of the media floor seating for the basketball tournament. Churchill Down has done away with the whole idea of having a press box.

What had been the Joe Hirsch Media Center overlooking the track has been transformed into a high-rollers area renamed, “The Mansion at Churchill Downs.” The reason is simple: Money. According to Ray Paulick of Paulickreport.com, the track figures to haul in $8 million over three years with the new luxury seating.

“Like any casino company, Churchill Downs Inc. now thinks in terms of revenue per square foot,” Paulick writes in an email. “The press box generated zero actual revenue, although it could be argued good press is worth something.”

What becomes of the media?

Reportedly, there are some media spots in the back of the grandstand about 150-200 yards from the finish line; the Hirsch Center was on the finish line. However, there is some question whether you can see the end of the race from that position. It is sort of important to see the end of the race.

Most reporters likely will watch the race on TV in a first-floor area that formerly housed the track’s corporate offices. Just as was the case at the NCAA tournament, where reporters were shuttled to the rafters in some venues, the new arrangement isn’t going down well with the turf writers.

Bozich, the long-time Louisville Courier-Journal columnist who now opines for WDRB.com in Louisville, writes: “I used to joke with some of my friends that the day would come when we were no longer in the stadium, arena or race track to watch the event that we’re covering. It’s not a joke any more.”

Besides Bozich and Paulick, I exchanged emails with Tom Pedulla, the president of the National Turf Writers and Broadcasters Association who will cover the race for America’s Best Racing and the New York Times; and Neil Milbert, who despite not attending this year speaks from experience of covering 31 Kentucky Derby races during his career at the Chicago Tribune.

The Central question: What do you miss by not being able to see the race in person from the press box?

Paulick: What I’ll miss is being able to soak in the flavor of the buildup to the race, looking down as the horses make the walkover from the stable area and the crowd’s reactions to the post- and pre-race activities. You can also get a much better idea of how the horses are doing, physically and mentally, as they walk over in front of the huge crowd, into the tunnel and then over to the paddock to be saddled. There was a viewing area of the paddock adjacent to the press box that was very useful. You can’t get any of that watching a television.

Pedulla: For those forced to watch on TV, it makes it impossible to convey the drama associated with what I firmly believe is “the most exciting two minutes in sports.” The roar of the crowd is unbelievable when the large field breaks from the starting gate, and it would be dishonest reporting to note that roar if you didn’t actually hear it. At least in my opinion.

Milbert: For me, drinking in the atmosphere from the upper level press box was an integral part of the experience. All of these sensations heightened my awareness of what was about to happen and I think they also tapped into my creative instincts when it came time to write.

********

Does watching the race on TV impact your ability to write a good story?

Milbert:The year that Smarty Jones won the Derby, I didn’t cover the race from the upstairs press box because a new state-of-the-art press box–that now has become a playpen for multi-millionaires–was being constructed and writers were relocated in a huge tent with big screen television sets. At the time I didn’t mind because there was torrential rain all day and I never left the tent. It wasn’t until I got home and saw the video-taped recording of the network telecast that I realized how much and how hard it rained. If I’d have been in the old press box, I’d have become aware immediately and perhaps I’d have written a better story.

*******

The press has supported this race for more than 100 years. Is there a sense of disrespect at what Churchill Downs is doing here?

Bozich: The media has been moved from The Mansion to the servant’s quarters.

Pedulla: Writers do feel disrespected by Churchill Downs. At the same time, I noted at our Breeders’ Cup meeting that we are faced with ever poorer positions in many other sports. I also will say that we must recognize that, as important a role as the media in keeping the Derby prominent, we are there as guests of Churchill Downs and can hardly dictate what they provide for us.

One point to stress is that the usual number of credentialed media can still be accommodated. If anything, the capacity to handle media might be greater.

We can only hope this is not a sign of things to come. The Breeders’ Cup will again be at Santa Anita this year. The main press box, and the auxiliary site, offer excellent locations.

Paulick: The disrespect for the media began years ago under different management. It’s just a continuation of that attitude.

 

 

 


 

 

 

Best viewing of year: NBC Sports Group superserves hockey fans in first round

The NHL playoffs begin tonight. Nothing like getting the second season started while the calendar still says April.

Thanks to the NHL’s TV deal with NBC, the first round of the playoffs now might represent the best week or two of hockey for the season.

For the second straight year, every game will air on national TV on one of these outlets: NBC, NBC Sports Network, CNBC, and NHL Network.

That’s every game, something that might not have happened if the NHL opted for ESPN. The multi-channel coverage created a great dynamic during the first round last year. Hockey fans worked out their remotes watching one dramatic finish after another. While the games get bigger during subsequent rounds, nothing matches the volume of the first round.

The end result produced an increase in ratings for the early rounds of the playoffs.

NBC and the NHL hope the numbers improve even more this year as more people catch on to the concept. There will be three games on tonight, and there are several days with four games.

I asked Sam Flood, NBC’s executive producer, about the set-up yesterday during a conference call:

The idea was to super-serve the hockey fan. That’s our Number 1 priority. The league wanted to make sure that their games were available to everyone. And that’s what we’ve partnered up to do with the NHL.

Gary Bettman and his team have been fabulous to work with making sure the schedule works. And unlike the NBA or baseball, this is a league that’s going to deal with two countries and make sure that they keep their partners at CVC, TSN, RDS and NBC happy.

And I can’t say how well the league was working through the schedule planning to make sure they’ve got good games on every night, to make sure the hockey fan has what they want. Which is hockey seven nights a week, and the match ups and times where they can consume them as often as possible.

Let the feast begin. Here’s the menu through May 8:

Tuesday, April 30
8 p.m. Minnesota (8) @ Chicago (1) NBCSN
8 p.m. Los Angeles (5) @ St. Louis (4) CNBC
10:30 p.m. Detroit (7) @ Anaheim (2) NBCSN
Wednesday, May 1
7 p.m. Toronto (5) @ Boston (4) CNBC
7:30 p.m. N.Y. Islanders (8) @ Pittsburgh (1) NBCSN
10:30 p.m. San Jose (6) @ Vancouver (3) NBCSN
Thursday, May 2
7 p.m. Ottawa (7) @ Montreal (2) CNBC
7:30 p.m. N.Y. Rangers (6) @ Washington (3) NBCSN
9:30 p.m. Los Angeles (5) @ St. Louis (4) CNBC
10 p.m. Detroit (7) @ Anaheim (2) NBCSN
Friday, May 3
7 p.m. N.Y. Islanders (8) @ Pittsburgh (1) NBCSN
7 p.m. Ottawa (7) @ Montreal (2) CNBC
9:30 p.m. Minnesota (8) @ Chicago (1) NBCSN
10 p.m. San Jose (6) @ Vancouver (3) CNBC
Saturday, May 4
12:30 p.m. N.Y. Rangers (6) @ Washington (3) NBC
7 p.m. Toronto (5) @ Boston (4) CNBC
7:30 p.m. Anaheim (2) @ Detroit (7) NBCSN
10 p.m. St. Louis (4) @ Los Angeles (5) NBCSN
Sunday, May 5
Noon Pittsburgh (1) @ N.Y. Islanders (8) NBC
3 p.m. Chicago (1) @ Minnesota (8) NBC
7 p.m. Montreal (2) @ Ottawa (7) NBCSN
10 p.m. Vancouver (3) @ San Jose (6) NBCSN
Monday, May 6
7 p.m. Boston (4) @ Toronto (5) NHL Network
7:30 p.m. Washington (3) @ N.Y. Rangers (6) NBCSN
8 p.m. Anaheim (2) @ Detroit (7) CNBC
10 p.m. St. Louis (4) @ Los Angeles (5) NBCSN
Tuesday, May 7
7 p.m. Pittsburgh (1) @ N.Y. Islanders (8) NBCSN
7 p.m. Montreal (2) @ Ottawa (7) CNBC
9:30 p.m. Chicago (1) @ Minnesota (8) NBCSN
10 p.m. Vancouver (3) @ San Jose (6) CNBC
Wednesday, May 8
7 p.m. Boston (4) @ Toronto (5) NHL Network
7:30 p.m. Washington (3) @ N.Y. Rangers (6) NBCSN

Here’s the official rundown from NBC:

Every first-round playoff game will be televised on a national platform.

In order to televise as many as four games on a given day/night, the NBC Sports Group will utilize NBC, NBC Sports Network, CNBC and the NHL Network to carry Conference Quarterfinal games.

NBC Sports Network will be the primary home of the Stanley Cup Playoffs, offering coverage of one or two games virtually every night of the first round. NBC will present exclusive afternoon coverage during the weekend of May 4-5.

CNBC and NHL Network will also provide live coverage in primetime. Games airing on NBC Sports Network, CNBC and the NHL Network will be subject to local blackouts in the first round.

See below for a complete Conference Quarterfinal schedule.

CONFERENCE SEMIFINALS

NBC Sports Group’s Stanley Cup Playoff exclusivity originates with the Conference Semifinal round. Beginning in the second round and continuing through the Stanley Cup Final, all games will air exclusively on NBC, NBC Sports Network, or CNBC.

NBC Sports Network will serve as the primary home for Conference Semifinal coverage, offering one or two games virtually every night of the second round. When necessary, CNBC will provide live coverage in primetime, although more infrequently than in the first round. NBC will present exclusive afternoon coverage during the weekend of May 18-19, plus a primetime game on Saturday, May 25.

CONFERENCE FINALS

NBC and the NBC Sports Network will team to provide exclusive coverage of the Conference Finals. NBC will broadcast Saturday games on June 1 and June 8. The remaining games from both the Eastern and Western Conference Finals will be televised exclusively on NBC Sports Network.

STANLEY CUP FINAL

For the eighth consecutive year, NBC and NBC Sports Network (formerly VERSUS) will provide exclusive coverage of the Stanley Cup Final. NBC will broadcast Game 1, Game 4, and Games 5-7 (if necessary), with NBC Sports Network televising Games 2-3. Emmy Award-winning play-by-play commentator Mike ‘Doc’ Emrick, analyst Eddie Olczyk and ‘Inside-the-Glass’ analyst Pierre McGuire will call the Stanley Cup Final.

What they’re saying: Gay sportswriter rejoices; CBS’ Brando says Collins not a hero

Quite a reaction indeed.

Chuck Culpepper in Sports on Earth, who wrote about being gay for the first time earlier this year:

The deluge of positivity surrounding this issue has astounded me, especially after six years abroad. You spend a good long while in life just hoping for a lack of derision, maybe some measure of distant understanding, and then so much of the nation just up and gives a big embrace. To a gay person — well, this one, anyway — it’s like spending years yearning for a Christmas puppy, and then the door opens and a whole litter stampedes out to swarm you.

Tim Brando generated quite a reaction with a series of tweets:

On the topic of Jason Collins I really don’t care and frankly why should anyone else.The HERO worship is out of bounds.I’m glad he is happy.

I used “choice” in reference to the timing. He is 34 at the end of his career and that in my opinion played a role on his coming out

I don’t apologize for being where I’m from or being a Christian, but anyone that plays the BIGOT card on me does not know my History.Sorry.

Dan Levy of Bleacher Report eloquently refutes Brando’s hero comment.

If the dictionary truly matters to Brando, he should go ahead and read it once in a while.

To the greater point, a hero is someone who inspires other people to be better, and to work hard to make this world we live in better every day.

Our lives are, in the grand scheme of history, short, and if someone decides to put the enormous weight of something like this on his shoulders to help other people get through a confusing, frightening or otherwise difficult time in their lives, that’s about as heroic as one can get.

The Boston Globe’s Dan Shaughnessy lauds Collins, but says he isn’t Jackie Robinson:

And it is not a big deal. It is not Jackie Robinson in 1947. Collins has come out at a time when few will challenge his right to his own sexual identity. There no doubt are folks who wish Collins kept this to himself, but woe is the ballplayer or commentator who will question anything about Collins’s sexual orientation.

We have evolved. There are gay men and women in just about every workplace. There have been gay ballplayers for more than a century. We just didn’t know about it.

Dave Zirin of The Nation in a tweet about Broussard:

If an ESPN commentator sees Christianity, Judaism, or Islam as evil, can they say so on air? Truly curious about where they draw line.

Jim Carlisle of the Ventura County Star had this view of Broussard:

To be frank about it, I think it took more courage for Chris Broussard to do what he did than it did for Jason Collins to do what he did.

Matt Yoder, the managing editor of Awful Announcing, didn’t post this view on his site. Instead, he did it in an extended tweet. When I asked why he went this route, he said he initially thought it was too personal. However, he said he still might post on AA.

I’m a Christian.  I stand with Jason Collins.

I feel the need to state this plainly because we live in a world where Christians have by and large failed the LGBT community and failed to follow through on the words and ministry of Christ.  As I read column after column today on Jason Collins coming out I felt more and more persuaded to say something so that the only Christian voice in this discussion isn’t one that condemns.

In the wake of Jason Collins coming out in Sports Illustrated, the Christian face of the reaction, at least in the sports world, is someone saying Collins should not be considered a Christian.  That is not something I can silently stand by and watch happen because it is not consistent with the ministry of Christ.

I read the piece written by Jason Collins in Sports Illustrated and rejoiced when I passed over these words because I hoped they could begin to tear down the wall too many of us Christians have built up blocking out the LGBT world:

James Andrew Miller, author of the ESPN book, did not think Monday was a good day for ESPN.

The hours @espn spent talking about #tebow today instead of #collins will live as dog years. Sad day for Bristol journalism.

Ken Fang of Fang’s Bites sums up a “bizarre day” with a timeline.

 

 

Posted in NBA